Differential molecular mechanisms of substrate recognition by selenium methyltransferases, INMT and TPMT, in selenium detoxification and excretion.

enzyme catalysis enzyme mechanism fragment molecular orbital method indolethylamine N-methyltransferase inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry metabolism molecular dynamics selenium thiopurine S-methyltransferase trimethylselenonium ion

Journal

The Journal of biological chemistry
ISSN: 1083-351X
Titre abrégé: J Biol Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985121R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 15 09 2023
revised: 13 12 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 2 1 2024
pubmed: 2 1 2024
entrez: 30 12 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

It is known that the recommended dietary allowance of selenium (Se) is dangerously close to its tolerable upper intake level. Se is detoxified and excreted in urine as trimethylselenonium ion (TMSe) when the amount ingested exceeds the nutritional level. Recently, we demonstrated that the production of TMSe requires two methyltransferases: thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and indolethylamine N-methyltransferase (INMT). In this study, we investigated the substrate recognition mechanisms of INMT and TPMT in the Se-methylation reaction. Examination of the Se-methyltransferase activities of two paralogs of INMT, namely, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT) and phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT), revealed that only INMT exhibited Se-methyltransferase activity. Consistently, molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that dimethylselenide (DMSe) was preferentially associated with the active center of INMT. Using the fragment molecular orbital method, we identified hydrophobic residues involved in the binding of DMSe to the active center of INMT. The INMT-L164R mutation resulted in a deficiency in Se- and N-methyltransferase activities. Similarly, TPMT-R152, which occupies the same position as INMT-L164, played a crucial role in the Se-methyltransferase activity of TPMT. Our findings suggest that TPMT recognizes negatively charged substrates, whereas INMT recognizes electrically neutral substrates in the hydrophobic active center embedded within the protein. These observations explain the sequential requirement of the two methyltransferases in producing TMSe.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38159853
pii: S0021-9258(23)02628-5
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105599
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105599

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.

Auteurs

Yasunori Fukumoto (Y)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan. Electronic address: fukumoto@faculty.chiba-u.jp.

Rin Kyono (R)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.

Yuka Shibukawa (Y)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.

Yu-Ki Tanaka (YK)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.

Noriyuki Suzuki (N)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.

Yasumitsu Ogra (Y)

Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8675, Japan.

Classifications MeSH