Development and delivery of justice, equity, diversity, inclusion, and anti-oppression concepts in entry-level health professional education: a scoping review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Dec 2023
29 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
2
1
2024
pubmed:
2
1
2024
entrez:
2
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The objective of this scoping review is to identify the frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver justice, equity, diversity, inclusion (JEDI), and anti-oppression (AO) principles in mandatory, entry-level health care professional program curricula (EHCPPC). A secondary objective will be to examine how these frameworks, guidelines, and models are used. Health inequities are perpetuated globally, as observed by the suboptimal quality of care and health outcomes among equity-deserving groups. An understanding of JEDI and AO concepts is necessary in health care settings to promote culturally safe and high-quality care; however, entry-level health care programs may lack adequate integration of content and/or delivery of these principles. This scoping review will summarize the international literature on frameworks, guidelines, and models used to develop and deliver JEDI and AO concepts in EHCPPC. This review will consider articles that discuss frameworks, models, or guidelines included in EHCPPC that guide the development and/or delivery of JEDI and AO principles in any country. Studies will be considered if they were published from 2015 to the present and are in English. All study designs will be considered for inclusion. This review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) will be conducted. Two or more independent reviewers will assess titles and abstracts, screen full-text studies, and extract data from included studies. Data from the included studies will be collated into tables or figures and described in a narrative summary. Open Science Framework osf.io/ewqf8.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38165208
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00223
pii: 02174543-990000000-00260
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Barnabe C, Osei-Tutu K, Maniate JM, Razack S, Wong BM, Thoma B, et al. Equity, diversity, inclusion, and social justice in CanMEDS 2025. Can Med Educ J 2023;14(1):27–32.
Benfer EA. Health justice: a framework (and call to action) for the elimination of health inequity and social justice. Am Univ Law Rev 2015;65:275.
Butler LM, Arya V, Nonyel NP, Moore TS. The Rx-HEART framework to address health equity and racism within pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ 2021;85(9):8590.
Peters HC, Luke M. Principles of anti‐oppression: a critical analytic synthesis. Couns Educ Superv 2022;61(4):335–348.
Borras AM. Toward an intersectional approach to health justice. Int J Health Serv 2021;51(2):206–225.
King M, Smith A, Gracey M. Indigenous health part 2: the underlying causes of the health gap. Lancet 2009;374(9683):76–85.
Medina-Martínez J, Saus-Ortega C, Sánchez-Lorente MM, Sosa-Palanca EM, García-Martínez P, Mármol-López MI. Health inequities in LGBT people and nursing interventions to reduce them: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res 2021;18(22):11801.
Weissman JS, Betancourt J, Campbell EG, Park ER, Kim M, Clarridge B, et al. Resident physicians’ preparedness to provide cross-cultural care. JAMA 2005;294(9):1058–1067.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada: calls to action [internet]. National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation; 2015 [cited 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.trc.ca.
Tang Q. Education 2030. Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4 2015;8:2016.
Keuroghlian AS, Charlton BM, Katz-Wise SL, Williams K, Jarvie E, Phillips R, et al. Harvard medical school’s sexual and gender minority health equity initiative: curricular and climate innovations in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med 2022;97(12):1786–1793.
Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med 2014;103:126–133.
Beavis AS, Hojjati A, Kassam A, Choudhury D, Fraser M, Masching R, et al. What all students in healthcare training programs should learn to increase health equity: perspectives on postcolonialism and the health of Aboriginal peoples in Canada. BMC Med Educ 2015;15(1):1–11.
Joseph OR, Flint SW, Raymond-Williams R, Awadzi R, Johnson J. Understanding healthcare students’ experiences of racial bias: a narrative review of the role of implicit bias and potential interventions in educational settings. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(23):12771.
Railey K, Barnett J. Is one lecture enough? Self-perception of bias and cultural training in medical education. J Physician Assist Educ 2022;10:1097.
Draper JK, Feltner C, Vander Schaaf EB, Mieses Malchuk A. Preparing medical students to address health disparities through longitudinally integrated social justice curricula: a systematic review. Acad Med 2022;97(8):1226–1235.
Taliancich-Klinger C, Hernandez NA, Maurer A. Engaging graduate students in cultural experiences early: the development, implementation, and preliminary student perceptions of a community engagement clinical experience. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2022;31(2):539–551.
Brottman MR, Char DM, Hattori RA, Heeb R, Taff SD. Toward cultural competency in health care: A scoping review of the diversity and inclusion education literature. Acad Med 2020;95(5):803–813.
Liblik KD, Veeral D, Yin G, Ng R, Maho S, Cohen N, et al. Professional development in health sciences: scoping review on equity, diversity, inclusion, indigeneity, and accessibility interventions. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2022;17:10–97.
Andraska EA, Alabi O, Dorsey C, Erben Y, Velazquez G, Franco-Mesa C, et al. Health care disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semin Vasc Surg 2021;34(3):82–88.
Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res 2005;8(1):19–32.
Peters MD, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020;18(10):2119–2126.
Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. Teaching and learning frameworks [internet]. Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning; 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/BackwardDesign.
American Library Association. Chapter 14: standards, guidelines, and frameworks [internet]. Association of College and Research Libraries; 2006 [cited 2023 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/resources/policies/chapter14.
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci 2015;10:53.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018;169(7):467–473.
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. JBI; 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 16]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
Drawson AS, Mushquash CJ. Indigenous research methods: a systematic review. Int Indig Policy J 2017;8(2).
Vieira LN, O’Hagan M, O’Sullivan C. Understanding the societal impacts of machine translation: a critical review of the literature on medical and legal use cases. Inform Commun Soc 2021;24(11):1515–1532.
Pollock D, Peters MDJ, Khalil H, McInerney P, Alexander L, Tricco AC, et al. Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2023;21(3):520–532.