A case of endocardial dissection caused by Micra implantation.
Endocardial tear
Leadless pacemakers
Micra
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
26
07
2023
accepted:
08
10
2023
medline:
4
1
2024
pubmed:
4
1
2024
entrez:
3
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Leadless pacemakers are a recent technological advancement. It has many advantages, but there are still a few serious complications. This article reports the case of a patient with an endocardial tear and dissection caused by contact with the tip of the Micra cup during surgery and summarises the relevant data. This case report details the occurrence and management of the incident and provides some guidance for future clinical management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Leadless pacemakers are a recent technological advancement. It has many advantages, but there are still a few serious complications.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
This article reports the case of a patient with an endocardial tear and dissection caused by contact with the tip of the Micra cup during surgery and summarises the relevant data.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This case report details the occurrence and management of the incident and provides some guidance for future clinical management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38166609
doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03550-y
pii: 10.1186/s12872-023-03550-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
10Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Piccini JP, El-Chami M, Wherry K, et al. Contemporaneous comparison of outcomes among patients implanted with a Leadless vs Transvenous single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(10):1187–95.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2621
pubmed: 34319383
Garweg C, Vandenberk B, Foulon S, Haemers P, Ector J, Willems R. Leadless pacing with Micra TPS: a comparison between right ventricular outflow tract, mid-septal, and apical implant sites. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):2002–11.
doi: 10.1111/jce.14083
pubmed: 31338871
Hauser RG, Gornick CC, Abdelhadi RH, et al. Leadless pacemaker perforations: clinical consequences and related device and user problems. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33(2):154–9.
doi: 10.1111/jce.15343
pubmed: 34953099
pmcid: 9305184
Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, et al. A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(6):533–41.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643
pubmed: 26551877
Hauser RG, Gornick CC, Abdelhadi RH, Tang CY, Casey SA, Sengupta JD. Major adverse clinical events associated with implantation of a leadless intracardiac pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(7):1132–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.015
pubmed: 33713856
Chen X, Wang J, Liang Y, Su Y, Ge J. Pericardial effusion caused by accidently placing a Micra transcatheter pacing system into the coronary sinus. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):461.
doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02266-1
pubmed: 34556052
pmcid: 8461975
Ngo L, Nour D, Denman RA, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Leadless pacemakers: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(13):e019212.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019212
pubmed: 34169736
pmcid: 8403316
Hai JJ, Fang J, Tam CC, et al. Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(6):896–902.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.12.007
pubmed: 30550834
Togashi I, Sato T, Hoshida K, Soejima K. Subclinical cardiac perforation caused by a Micra™ leadless pacemaker. J Arrhythm. 2018;34(3):326–8.
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12052
pubmed: 29951156
pmcid: 6009778
Middour TG, Chen JH, El-Chami MF. Leadless pacemakers: a review of current data and future directions. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;66:61–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.003
pubmed: 34332661
Mitacchione G, Schiavone M, Gasperetti A et al. Sex differences in leadless pacemaker implantation: a propensity-matched analysis from the i-LEAPER registry. Heart Rhythm 2023.