Macrophages reprogramming driven by cancer-associated fibroblasts under FOLFIRINOX treatment correlates with shorter survival in pancreatic cancer.

Chemoresistance FOLFIRINOX Intercellular communication Pancreatic cancer Tumor-associated macrophages cancer-associated fibroblasts

Journal

Cell communication and signaling : CCS
ISSN: 1478-811X
Titre abrégé: Cell Commun Signal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170464

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 12 09 2023
accepted: 06 11 2023
medline: 4 1 2024
pubmed: 4 1 2024
entrez: 3 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a clinically challenging cancer, mainly due to limited therapeutic options and the presence of a highly prominent tumor microenvironment (TME), facilitating tumor progression. The TME is predominated by heterogeneous populations of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), in constant communication with each other and with tumor cells, influencing many tumoral abilities such as therapeutic resistance. However how the crosstalk between CAFs and macrophages evolves following chemotherapeutic treatment remains poorly understood, limiting our capacity to halt therapeutic resistance. We combined biological characterization of macrophages indirectly cocultured with human PDAC CAFs, under FOLFIRINOX treatment, with mRNAseq analyses of such macrophages and evaluated the relevance of the specific gene expression signature in a large series of primary PDAC patients to search for correlation with overall survival (OS) after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Firstly, we demonstrated that CAFs polarize naïve and M1 macrophages towards an M2-like phenotype with a specific increase of CD200R and CD209 M2 markers. Then, we demonstrated that CAFs counteract the pro-inflammatory phenotype induced by the FOLFIRINOX on Macrophages. Indeed, we highlighted that, under FOLFIRINOX, CAFs limit the FOLFIRINOX-induced cell death of macrophages and further reinforce their M2 phenotype as well as their immunosuppressive impact through specific chemokines production. Finally, we revealed that under FOLFIRINOX CAFs drive a specific macrophage gene expression signature involving SELENOP and GOS2 that correlates with shortened OS in FOLFIRINOX-treated PDAC patients. Our study provides insight into the complex interactions between TME cells under FOLFIRINOX treatment. It suggests potential novel candidates that could be used as therapeutic targets in combination with FOLFIRINOX to prevent and alleviate TME influx on therapeutic resistance as well as biomarkers to predict FOLFIRINOX response in PDAC patients. Video Abstract.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a clinically challenging cancer, mainly due to limited therapeutic options and the presence of a highly prominent tumor microenvironment (TME), facilitating tumor progression. The TME is predominated by heterogeneous populations of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor associated macrophages (TAMs), in constant communication with each other and with tumor cells, influencing many tumoral abilities such as therapeutic resistance. However how the crosstalk between CAFs and macrophages evolves following chemotherapeutic treatment remains poorly understood, limiting our capacity to halt therapeutic resistance.
METHODS METHODS
We combined biological characterization of macrophages indirectly cocultured with human PDAC CAFs, under FOLFIRINOX treatment, with mRNAseq analyses of such macrophages and evaluated the relevance of the specific gene expression signature in a large series of primary PDAC patients to search for correlation with overall survival (OS) after FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy.
RESULTS RESULTS
Firstly, we demonstrated that CAFs polarize naïve and M1 macrophages towards an M2-like phenotype with a specific increase of CD200R and CD209 M2 markers. Then, we demonstrated that CAFs counteract the pro-inflammatory phenotype induced by the FOLFIRINOX on Macrophages. Indeed, we highlighted that, under FOLFIRINOX, CAFs limit the FOLFIRINOX-induced cell death of macrophages and further reinforce their M2 phenotype as well as their immunosuppressive impact through specific chemokines production. Finally, we revealed that under FOLFIRINOX CAFs drive a specific macrophage gene expression signature involving SELENOP and GOS2 that correlates with shortened OS in FOLFIRINOX-treated PDAC patients.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our study provides insight into the complex interactions between TME cells under FOLFIRINOX treatment. It suggests potential novel candidates that could be used as therapeutic targets in combination with FOLFIRINOX to prevent and alleviate TME influx on therapeutic resistance as well as biomarkers to predict FOLFIRINOX response in PDAC patients. Video Abstract.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38167013
doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01388-7
pii: 10.1186/s12964-023-01388-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 pubmed: 33538338
Grant TJ, Hua K, Singh A. Molecular pathogenesis of pancreatic Cancer. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2016;144:241–75.
doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.09.008 pubmed: 27865459 pmcid: 6260831
Shinde RS, Bhandare M, Chaudhari V, Shrikhande SV. Cutting-edge strategies for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg Japan. 2019;3:368–72.
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12254
Principe DR, Korc M, Kamath SD, Munshi HG, Rana A. Trials and tribulations of pancreatic cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett Ireland. 2021;504:1–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.01.031
Principe DR, Underwood PW, Korc M, Trevino JG, Munshi HG, Rana A. The current treatment paradigm for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and barriers to therapeutic efficacy. Front Oncol. 2021;11:1–25.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.688377
Springfeld C, Jäger D, Büchler MW, Strobel O, Hackert T, Palmer DH, et al. Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Presse Med France. 2019;48:e159–74.
doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.02.025
Carvalho TMA, Di Molfetta D, Greco MR, Koltai T, Alfarouk KO, Reshkin SJ, et al. Tumor microenvironment features and chemoresistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: insights into targeting physicochemical barriers and metabolism as therapeutic approaches. Cancers (Basel). 2021:13.
Vaish U, Jain T, Are AC, Dudeja V. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an update on heterogeneity and therapeutic targeting. Int J Mol Sci. 2021:22.
Pereira BA, Vennin C, Papanicolaou M, Chambers CR, Herrmann D, Morton JP, et al. CAF subpopulations: a new reservoir of stromal targets in pancreatic Cancer. In: Trends in Cancer, vol. 5. Elsevier Inc.; 2019. p. 724–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2019.09.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.09.010
Yang S, Liu Q, Liao Q. Tumor-associated macrophages in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: origin, polarization, function, and reprogramming. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;8:1–24.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.607209
Neuzillet C, Nicolle R, Raffenne J, Tijeras-Raballand A, Brunel A, Astorgues-Xerri L, et al. Periostin- and podoplanin-positive cancer-associated fibroblast subtypes cooperate to shape the inflamed tumor microenvironment in aggressive pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Pathol. 2022;258:408–25.
doi: 10.1002/path.6011 pubmed: 36102377 pmcid: 9828775
Garcia Garcia CJ, Huang Y, Fuentes NR, Turner MC, Monberg ME, Lin D, et al. Stromal HIF2 regulates immune suppression in the pancreatic Cancer microenvironment. Gastroenterol United States. 2022;162:2018–31.
Datta J, Dai X, Bianchi A, De Castro SI, Mehra S, Garrido VT, et al. Combined MEK and STAT3 inhibition uncovers stromal plasticity by enriching for Cancer-associated fibroblasts with mesenchymal stem cell-like features to overcome immunotherapy resistance in pancreatic Cancer. Gastroenterol United States. 2022;163:1593–612.
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics England. 2014;30:2114–20.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e108. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt214 .
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt214 pubmed: 23558742 pmcid: 3664803
Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS United States. 2012;16:284–7.
doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0118
Birnbaum DJ, Finetti P, Birnbaum D, Mamessier E, Bertucci F. XPO1 expression is a poor-prognosis marker in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Med. 2019;8. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/5/596 ,  https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050596 .
Vayrynen SA, Zhang J, Yuan C, Vayrynen JP, Costa AD, Williams H, et al. Composition, spatial characteristics, and prognostic significance of myeloid cell infiltration in pancreatic Cancer. Clin Cancer Res United States. 2021;27:1069–81.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3141
Hu H, Tu W, Chen Y, Zhu M, Jin H, Huang T, et al. The combination of PKM2 overexpression and M2 macrophages infiltration confers a poor prognosis for PDAC patients. J Cancer Australia. 2020;11:2022–31.
doi: 10.7150/jca.38981
Sadozai H, Acharjee A, Eppenberger-Castori S, Gloor B, Gruber T, Schenk M, et al. Distinct stromal and immune features collectively contribute to long-term survival in pancreatic Cancer. Front Immunol Switzerland. 2021;12:643529.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.643529
Hu H, Hang J-J, Han T, Zhuo M, Jiao F, Wang L-W. The M2 phenotype of tumor-associated macrophages in the stroma confers a poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Tumour Biol J Int Soc Oncodevelopmental Biol Med Netherlands. 2016;37:8657–64.
doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4741-z
Zhang A, Qian Y, Ye Z, Chen H, Xie H, Zhou L, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote M2 polarization of macrophages in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Med United States. 2017;6:463–70.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.993
Hessmann E, Patzak MS, Klein L, Chen N, Kari V, Ramu I, et al. Fibroblast drug scavenging increases intratumoural gemcitabine accumulation in murine pancreas cancer. Gut. 2018;67:497–507. Available from: http://gut.bmj.com/content/67/3/497.abstract ,  https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311954 .
Hesler RA, Huang JJ, Starr MD, Treboschi VM, Bernanke AG, Nixon AB, et al. TGF-β-induced stromal CYR61 promotes resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through downregulation of the nucleoside transporters hENT1 and hCNT3. Carcinogenesis England. 2016;37:1041–51.
doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgw093
Dalin S, Sullivan MR, Lau AN, Grauman-Boss B, Mueller HS, Kreidl E, et al. Deoxycytidine release from pancreatic stellate cells promotes gemcitabine resistance. Cancer Res United States. 2019;79:5723–33.
Rőszer T. Understanding the mysterious M2 macrophage through activation markers and effector mechanisms. In: Keisari Y, editor. Mediators Inflamm, vol. 2015. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2015. p. 816460. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/816460 .
doi: 10.1155/2015/816460
Schulz D, Severin Y, Zanotelli VRT, Bodenmiller B. In-depth characterization of monocyte-derived macrophages using a mass cytometry-based phagocytosis assay. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38127-9 .
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38127-9 pubmed: 30760760 pmcid: 6374473
Lecoultre M, Dutoit V, Walker PR. Phagocytic function of tumor-associated macrophages as a key determinant of tumor progression control: a review. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8:e001408. Available from: http://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e001408.abstract , https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001408 .
D’Errico G, Alonso-Nocelo M, Vallespinos M, Hermann PC, Alcalá S, García CP, et al. Tumor-associated macrophage-secreted 14-3-3ζ signals via AXL to promote pancreatic cancer chemoresistance. Oncogene England. 2019;38:5469–85.
doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0803-9
Li S, Hu Y, Liu O, Li X, Lin B. Prognostic biomarker MCP-4 triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition via the p38 MAPK pathway in ovarian cancer. Front Oncol Switzerland. 2022;12:1034737.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1034737
Liu Z, Rui T, Lin Z, Xie S, Zhou B, Fu M, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages promote metastasis of Oral squamous cell carcinoma via CCL13 regulated by stress granule. Cancers (Basel) Switzerland; 2022. p. 14.
Yang Y, Li D, Wu W, Huang D, Zheng H, Aihaiti Y. A Pan-Cancer analysis of the role of Selenoprotein P mRNA in tumorigenesis. Int J Gen Med New Zealand. 2021;14:7471–85.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S332031
Barrett CW, Reddy VK, Short SP, Motley AK, Lintel MK, Bradley AM, et al. Selenoprotein P influences colitis-induced tumorigenesis by mediating stemness and oxidative damage. J Clin Invest United States. 2015;125:2646–60.
doi: 10.1172/JCI76099
Qi L, Zhou H, Wang Y, Jablonska E, Wang M, Su S, et al. The role of selenoprotein P in the determining the sensitivity of cervical cancer patients to concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a metabonomics-based analysis. J trace Elem Med Biol organ Soc Miner Trace Elem Germany. 2022;73:127041.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2022.127041
Heckmann BL, Zhang X, Xie X, Liu J. The G0/G1 switch gene 2 (G0S2): regulating metabolism and beyond. Biochim Biophys Acta Netherlands. 2013;1831:276–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2012.09.016
Zhang X, Heckmann BL, Campbell LE, Liu J. G0S2: a small giant controller of lipolysis and adipose-liver fatty acid flux. Biochim Biophys acta Mol cell biol lipids Netherlands. 2017;1862:1146–54.
Bai R, Rebelo A, Kleeff J, Sunami Y. Identification of prognostic lipid droplet-associated genes in pancreatic cancer patients via bioinformatics analysis. Lipids Health Dis England. 2021;20:58.
doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01476-y

Auteurs

Zainab Hussain (Z)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Thomas Bertran (T)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Pascal Finetti (P)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Eugenie Lohmann (E)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Emilie Mamessier (E)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Ghislain Bidaut (G)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

François Bertucci (F)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.

Moacyr Rego (M)

Therapeutic Innovation Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.

Richard Tomasini (R)

Cancer Research Center of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Institute Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. richard.tomasini@inserm.fr.

Classifications MeSH