Association of omental pedicled flap with anastomotic leak following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
anastomotic leak
low anastomotic resection
omental pedicled flap
rectal cancer
Journal
Journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1096-9098
Titre abrégé: J Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0222643
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
revised:
12
12
2023
received:
27
10
2023
accepted:
16
12
2023
medline:
4
1
2024
pubmed:
4
1
2024
entrez:
3
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Anastomotic leak following colorectal anastomosis adversely impacts short-term, oncologic, and quality-of-life outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of omental pedicled flap (OPF) on anastomotic leak among patients undergoing low anastomotic resection (LAR) for rectal cancer using a multi-institutional database. Adult rectal cancer patients in the US Rectal Cancer Consortium, who underwent a LAR for stage I-III rectal cancer with or without an OPF were included. Patients with missing data for surgery type and OPF use were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome was the development of anastomotic leaks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association. A total of 853 patients met the inclusion criteria and OPF was used in 106 (12.4%) patients. There was no difference in age, sex, or tumor stage of patients who underwent OPF versus those who did not. OPF use was not associated with an anastomotic leak (p = 0.82), or operative blood loss (p = 0.54) but was associated with an increase in the operative duration [β = 21.42 (95% confidence interval = 1.16, 41.67) p = 0.04]. Among patients undergoing LAR for rectal cancer, OPF use was associated with an increase in operative duration without any impact on the rate of anastomotic leak.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Anastomotic leak following colorectal anastomosis adversely impacts short-term, oncologic, and quality-of-life outcomes. This study aimed to assess the impact of omental pedicled flap (OPF) on anastomotic leak among patients undergoing low anastomotic resection (LAR) for rectal cancer using a multi-institutional database.
METHODS
METHODS
Adult rectal cancer patients in the US Rectal Cancer Consortium, who underwent a LAR for stage I-III rectal cancer with or without an OPF were included. Patients with missing data for surgery type and OPF use were excluded from the analysis. The primary outcome was the development of anastomotic leaks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 853 patients met the inclusion criteria and OPF was used in 106 (12.4%) patients. There was no difference in age, sex, or tumor stage of patients who underwent OPF versus those who did not. OPF use was not associated with an anastomotic leak (p = 0.82), or operative blood loss (p = 0.54) but was associated with an increase in the operative duration [β = 21.42 (95% confidence interval = 1.16, 41.67) p = 0.04].
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients undergoing LAR for rectal cancer, OPF use was associated with an increase in operative duration without any impact on the rate of anastomotic leak.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1150-1154.
Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA Surgery. 2013;148:65-71.
Taflampas P, Christodoulakis M, Tsiftsis DD. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: facts, obscurity, and fiction. Surg Today. 2009;39:183-188.
Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, Bemelman WA, Tanis PJ. Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:870-877.
Cong ZJ, Hu LH, Bian ZQ, et al. Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75519.
Schaupp WC. Drainage of low anterior anastomoses. Am J Surg. 1969;118:627-631.
Goldsmith HS. Protection of low rectal anastomosis with intact omentum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1977;144:584-586.
Lanter B, Mason RA. Use of omental pedicle graft to protect low anterior colonic anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1979;22:448-451.
Russ JE, Smoron GL, Gagnon JD. Omental transposition flap in colorectal carcinoma: adjunctive use in prevention and treatment of radiation complications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984;10:55-62.
Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Lepre L, et al. Prospective evaluation of omentoplasty in preventing leakage of colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:951-955.
Agnifili A, Schietroma M, Carloni A, et al. The value of omentoplasty in protecting colorectal anastomosis from leakage. A prospective randomized study in 126 patients. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2004;51:1694-1697.
Nasiri S, Mirminachi B, Taherimehr R, Shadbakhsh R, Hojat M. The effect of omentoplasty on the rate of anastomotic leakage after intestinal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Am Surg. 2017;83:157-160.
Merad F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Flamant Y, Molkhou JM, Laborde Y. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colonic or rectal resection: a prospective randomized study in 712 patients. Ann Surg. 1998;227:179-186.
Ozben V, Aytac E, Liu X, Ozuner G. Does omental pedicle flap reduce anastomotic leak and septic complications after rectal cancer surgery? Int J Surg. 2016;27:53-57.
Ozben V, Ozuner G, Isik O, Gorgun E, Stocchi L, Liu X. Impact of omentoplasty on anastomotic leak and septic complications after low pelvic anastomosis: a study from the NSQIP database. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:1733-1739.
Hao X-Y, Yang K-H, Guo T-K, Ma B, Tian JH, Li HL. Omentoplasty in the prevention of anastomotic leakage after colorectal resection: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1159-1165.
Sahebally SM, Chan E, Azmir A, et al. Omentoplasty to reduce anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2022;92:1651-1657.
Defining Adult Overweight & Obesity | Overweight & Obesity | CDC. Accessed September 12, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/basics/adult-defining.html
Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:3-15.
Giordano P, Renzi A, Gervaz P. Colorectal anastomosis and omentoplasty: re-evaluation of statistical analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:145.
McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015;102:462-479.
Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Andersson M, Rutegård J, Sjödahl R. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:462-469.
Charalambides M, Mavrou A, Jennings T, et al. A systematic review of the literature assessing operative blood loss and postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37:47-69.
Simillis C, Charalambides M, Mavrou A, et al. Operative blood loss adversely affects short and long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2023;27:189-208.
Zarnescu EC, Zarnescu NO, Costea R. Updates of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Diagnostics. 2021;11:2382.
Biffi R, Luca F, Pozzi S, et al. Operative blood loss and use of blood products after full robotic and conventional low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for treatment of rectal cancer. J Robot Surg. 2011;5:101-107.
Nagata M, Matsuda T, Hasegawa H, et al. Usefulness of omentoplasty to reduce perineal wound complications in abdominoperineal resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res. 2020;40:6539-6543.
Scarpinata R, Aly EH. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery offer improved early postoperative outcomes? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:253-262.
Balentine CJ, Wilks J, Robinson C, et al. Obesity increases wound complications in rectal cancer surgery. J Surg Res. 2010;163:35-39.
Chern H, Chou J, Donkor C, et al. Effects of obesity in rectal cancer surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:55-60.
Poulsen M, Ovesen H. Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in obese patients associated with an increased risk? Short-term results from a single center study of 425 patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1554-1558.
Hermeneit S, Müller M, Terzic A, Rodehorst A, Böttger T. Sinn oder Unsinn einer prophylaktischen drainage nach laparoskopischer Kolonresektion - eine prospektive Untersuchung. Zentralbl Chir. 2008;133:250-254.