To trust or not to trust in the thrall of the COVID-19 pandemic: Conspiracy endorsement and the role of adverse childhood experiences, epistemic trust, and personality functioning.

Adverse childhood experiences COVID-19 Child maltreatment Conspiracy endorsement Epistemic trust Mediation Personality functioning

Journal

Social science & medicine (1982)
ISSN: 1873-5347
Titre abrégé: Soc Sci Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8303205

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 22 06 2023
revised: 27 11 2023
accepted: 16 12 2023
medline: 4 1 2024
pubmed: 4 1 2024
entrez: 3 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Conspiracy endorsement is a public health challenge for the successful containment of the COVID-19 pandemic. While usually considered a societal phenomenon, little is known about the equally important developmental backdrops and personality characteristics like mistrust that render an individual prone to conspiracy endorsement. There is a growing body of evidence implying a detrimental role of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) - a highly prevalent developmental burden - in the development of epistemic trust and personality functioning. This study aimed to investigate the association between ACEs and conspiracy endorsement in the general population, specifically questioning a mediating role of epistemic trust and personality functioning. Based on cross-sectional data from a representative German survey collected during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 2501), we conducted structural equation modelling (SEM) where personality functioning (OPD-SQS) and epistemic trust (ETMCQ) were included as mediators of the association between ACEs and conspiracy endorsement. Bootstrapped confidence intervals (5000 samples, 95%-CI) are presented for all paths. ACEs were significantly associated with conspiracy endorsement (β = 0.25, p < 0.001) and explained 6% of its variance. Adding epistemic trust and personality functioning as mediators increased the explained variance of conspiracy endorsement to 19% while the direct association between ACEs and conspiracy endorsement was diminished (β = 0.12, p < 0.001), indicating an indirect effect of personality functioning and epistemic trust in the association between ACEs and conspiracy endorsement. Fit indices confirmed good model fit. Establishing an association between ACEs and conspiracy endorsement further increases the evidence for early childhood adversities' far-reaching and detrimental effects. By including epistemic trust and personality functioning, these findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms in the way that ACEs may be associated with conspiracy endorsement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38169177
pii: S0277-9536(23)00883-3
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116526
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

116526

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Hanna Kampling (H)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany. Electronic address: hanna.kampling@psycho.med.uni-giessen.de.

David Riedl (D)

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Nora Hettich (N)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Astrid Lampe (A)

Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Vienna, Austria; VAMED Rehabilitation Center, Schruns, Austria.

Tobias Nolte (T)

Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.

Sandra Zara (S)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Mareike Ernst (M)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis, Institute of Psychology, University of Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt Am Wörthersee, Austria.

Elmar Brähler (E)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Adiposity Diseases, Behavioral Medicine Research Unit, University Medical Center Leipzig, Germany.

Cedric Sachser (C)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Jörg M Fegert (JM)

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

Stephan Gingelmaier (S)

Psychology and Diagnostics for Emotional and Social Development for the Emotionally Impaired, University of Education Ludwigsburg, Germany.

Peter Fonagy (P)

Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, United Kingdom.

Lina Krakau (L)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Johannes Kruse (J)

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany; Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Center of the Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH