Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance.

cognitive dissonance decision making free choice paradigm medial frontal cortex (MFC) preference changes transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 23 11 2022
accepted: 15 11 2023
medline: 4 1 2024
pubmed: 4 1 2024
entrez: 3 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Difficult choices between two equally attractive options result in a cognitive discrepancy between dissonant cognitions such as preferences and actions often followed by a sense of psychological discomfort known as cognitive dissonance. It can lead to changes in the desirability of options: the chosen option becomes more desirable, whereas the rejected option is devalued. Despite the ample experimental evidence to show this effect, the neural mechanisms and timing of such choice-induced preference changes are not fully understood. In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate the activity of the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), which has been associated with conflict monitoring and choice-induced preference changes in neuroimaging studies. Prior to a revised version of Brehm's free-choice paradigm, participants in two experiments underwent cathodal (inhibitory) or anodal (excitatory) tDCS of the pMFC compared to sham (placebo) stimulation prior to the choice phase. Our results showed that cathodal tDCS significantly decreased the choice-induced preference change relative to a sham, but only in direct comparisons of rejected options. No significant effect of anodal tDCS in comparison with sham was observed. This study replicates the general behavioral effect of cognitive dissonance and provide partial support for the theory of the pMFC contribution to choice-related cognitive dissonance and subsequent preference changes, with possible limitations of an under-sampling for the obtained effect size and an asymmetry in the inhibitory-excitatory effects of non-invasive tDCS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38170108
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410
pmc: PMC10760977
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1104410

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Rybina, Colosio, Shestakova and Klucharev.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Elena Rybina (E)

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Marco Colosio (M)

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Anna Shestakova (A)

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Vasily Klucharev (V)

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Classifications MeSH