Barriers to research findings utilization amongst critical care nurses and allied health professionals: An international survey.

Critical care nursing Evidence-based practice Research utilization

Journal

Intensive & critical care nursing
ISSN: 1532-4036
Titre abrégé: Intensive Crit Care Nurs
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9211274

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 29 07 2023
revised: 16 11 2023
accepted: 15 12 2023
medline: 4 1 2024
pubmed: 4 1 2024
entrez: 3 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine the perceived barriers to the implementation of research findings in clinical practice among critical care nurses and allied health professionals. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire sent to critical care nurses and allied health professionals in French-speaking countries. The primary objective was the identification and grading of perceived barriers to implementation of research findings into clinical practice, using a previously validated tool (French version of the BARRIERS scale). The scale is divided into 4 dimensions, each containing 6 to 7 questions to be answered using a 4-point Likert scale (1: no barrier, 4: great barrier). Descriptive statistics were performed and weighted score per dimensions were compared. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed to identify factors associated with the total score by dimension. A total of 994 nurses and allied health professionals (85.1 % of ICU nurses) from 5 countries (71.8 % from France) responded to the survey. Main reported barriers to research findings utilization were "Statistical analyses are not understandable" (54.5 %), "Research articles are not readily available" (54.3 %), and "Implications for practice are not made clear" (54.2 %). Weighted scores differed between dimensions, with the "communication" and "organization" dimensions being the greatest barriers (median [IQR]: 2.3 [1.8-2.7] and 2.0 [1.6-2.4], while the "adopter" and "innovation" dimensions having lower scores (1.5 [1.2-1.8] and 1.5 [1.0-1.8] (all pairwise comparisons p-value < 0.0001, except for the adopter vs. innovation comparison, p > 0.05). Accessibility and understanding of research results seem to be the main barriers to research utilization in practice by respondents. A large number of the reported barriers could be overcome through education and organizational change. Promoting a research culture among nurses and allied health professionals is an issue that needs investment. This should include training in critical reading of scientific articles and statistics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38171952
pii: S0964-3397(23)00228-8
doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103610
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

103610

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Laurent Poiroux (L)

Medical intensive care unit, University Hospital of Angers, France; Nursing Department Health Faculty of the University of Angers - Inserm UMR 1085 - Equipe d'épidémiologie en santé au travail et ergonomie (ESTER), France.

Arnaud Bruyneel (A)

Health Economics, Hospital Management and Nursing Research Dept, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium. Electronic address: arnaud.bruyneel@ulb.be.

Lionel Larcin (L)

Research Centre for Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, School of Public Health, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.

Guillaume Fossat (G)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital Centre, Orléans, France; UR 20201, Equipe de Recherché Paramédicale sur le Handicap Neuromoteur (ERPHAN), université Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, France.

Toufik Kamel (T)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Regional Hospital Centre, Orléans, France.

Guylaine Labro (G)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Groupement Hospitalier Régional Mulhouse Et Sud Alsace, Hôpital Emile Muller, Mulhouse, France.

Suzanne Goursaud (S)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, CHU de Caen Normandie, France.

Anahita Rouze (A)

University Lille, Inserm U1285, CHU Lille, Medical Intensive Care Unit, CNRS, UMR 8576 - UGSF - Unité de Glycobiologie Structurale et Fonctionnelle, F-59000 Lille, France.

Nicholas Heming (N)

Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, APHP University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, 92380 Garches, France; Laboratory of Infection & Inflammation-U1173, School of Medicine Simone Veil, University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, INSERM, 92380 Garches, France; FHU SEPSIS (Saclay and Paris Seine Nord Endeavour to PerSonalize Interventions for Sepsis), 92380 Garches, France.

Bertrand Hermann (B)

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité (APHP.Centre-Université Paris Cité), Paris, France; INSERM UMR 1266, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (IPNP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH