Predictors of graft function and survival in second kidney transplantation: A single center experience.

Graft failure Graft function Kidney Kidney retransplantation Primary non-function graft Second kidney transplantation

Journal

World journal of transplantation
ISSN: 2220-3230
Titre abrégé: World J Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101608356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 16 08 2023
revised: 19 10 2023
accepted: 03 11 2023
medline: 4 1 2024
pubmed: 4 1 2024
entrez: 4 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The increasing kidney retransplantation rate has created a parallel field of research, including the risk factors and outcomes of this advanced form of renal replacement therapy. The presentation of experiences from different kidney transplantation centers may help enrich the literature on kidney retransplantation, as a specific topic in the field of kidney transplantation. To identify the risk factors affecting primary graft function and graft survival rates after second kidney transplantation (SKT). The records of SKT cases performed between January 1977 and December 2014 at a European tertiary-level kidney transplantation center were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Beside the descriptive characteristics, the survivals of patients and both the first and second grafts were described using Kaplan-Meier curves. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analyses were also used to estimate the survival probabilities at 1, 3, 5, and 10 post-operative years, as well as at the longest follow-up duration available. Moreover, bivariate associations between various predictors and the categorical outcomes were assessed, using the suitable biostatistical tests, according to the predictor type. Out of 1861 cases of kidney transplantation, only 48 cases with SKT were eligible for studying, including 33 men and 15 women with a mean age of 42.1 ± 13 years. The primary non-function (PNF) graft occurred in five patients (10.4%). In bivariate analyses, a high body mass index ( Non-immediate recovery modes of the first and second graft functions were significantly associated with unfavorable second graft survival rates. Patient and graft survival rates of SKT were similar to those of the first kidney transplantation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The increasing kidney retransplantation rate has created a parallel field of research, including the risk factors and outcomes of this advanced form of renal replacement therapy. The presentation of experiences from different kidney transplantation centers may help enrich the literature on kidney retransplantation, as a specific topic in the field of kidney transplantation.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To identify the risk factors affecting primary graft function and graft survival rates after second kidney transplantation (SKT).
METHODS METHODS
The records of SKT cases performed between January 1977 and December 2014 at a European tertiary-level kidney transplantation center were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Beside the descriptive characteristics, the survivals of patients and both the first and second grafts were described using Kaplan-Meier curves. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analyses were also used to estimate the survival probabilities at 1, 3, 5, and 10 post-operative years, as well as at the longest follow-up duration available. Moreover, bivariate associations between various predictors and the categorical outcomes were assessed, using the suitable biostatistical tests, according to the predictor type.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 1861 cases of kidney transplantation, only 48 cases with SKT were eligible for studying, including 33 men and 15 women with a mean age of 42.1 ± 13 years. The primary non-function (PNF) graft occurred in five patients (10.4%). In bivariate analyses, a high body mass index (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Non-immediate recovery modes of the first and second graft functions were significantly associated with unfavorable second graft survival rates. Patient and graft survival rates of SKT were similar to those of the first kidney transplantation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38174152
doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i6.331
pmc: PMC10758684
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

331-343

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

Auteurs

Mahmoud Khalil (M)

Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Assiut, Egypt.

Rabea Ahmed Gadelkareem (RA)

Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Assiut, Egypt. dr.rabeagad@yahoo.com.

Medhat Ahmed Abdallah (MA)

Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Assiut, Egypt.

Mohamed Abdel-Basir Sayed (MA)

Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Assiut, Egypt.

Fathy Gaber Elanany (FG)

Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Assiut, Egypt.

Paolo Fornara (P)

Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, Martin Luther University, Halle (Saale) 71515, Germany.

Nasreldin Mohammed (N)

Department of Urology, Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut 71515, Assiut, Egypt.

Classifications MeSH