How long do we need to reach sufficient expertise with the avatera® robotic system?
Avatera® system
Dry lab
Learning curve
Robotic system
Training
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jan 2024
04 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
25
10
2023
accepted:
08
12
2023
medline:
4
1
2024
pubmed:
4
1
2024
entrez:
4
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To investigate the learning curve in four basic surgical skills in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, and evaluate the approximate time needed to reach sufficient expertise in performing these tasks with the avatera® system. Twenty urology residents with no previous experience in dry-lab and robotic surgery were asked to complete four basic laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, needle guidance, and suturing) laparoscopically and robotically. All participants were asked to complete the tasks first after watching the Uroweb educational material and, second, after undertaking a 2-hour training in robotic and laparoscopic dry-lab. Thereafter, all trainees continued to undertake 2-hour training programs until being able to complete the tasks with the avatera® robot at the desired time. Paired t test and one-way ANOVA test were used to analyze time differences between the groups. Time needed to complete all tasks either robotically or laparoscopically was significantly less in the second compared to the first attempt for all Groups in each Task. In the robotic dry-lab, time needed to complete the tasks was significantly less than in the laparoscopic dry-lab. A significant effect of previous laparoscopic experience of the participants on the training time needed to achieve most of the goal times was detected. The results of the study highlight the role of previous laparoscopic experience in the training time needed to achieve the performance time goals and demonstrate that the learning curve of basic surgical skills using the avatera® system is steeper than the laparoscopic one.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38175386
doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03914-5
pii: 10.1007/s11255-023-03914-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Zahid A, Ayyan M, Farooq M, Cheema HA, Shahid A, Naeem F, Ilyas MA, Sohail S (2023) Robotic surgery in comparison to the open and laparoscopic approaches in the field of urology: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 17(1):11–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01416-7
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01416-7
pubmed: 35526260
Surgical I (2020) Sustainability report 2020. https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/-/media/Project/Intuitive-surgical/files/pdf/2020-intuitive-sustainability-report.pdf
Dai X, Fan S, Hao H, Yang K, Shen C, Xiong G, Li X, Cui L, Li X, Zhou L (2021) Comparison of KD-SR-01 robotic partial nephrectomy and 3D-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from an operative and ergonomic perspective: a prospective randomized controlled study in porcine models. Int J Med Robot 17(2):e2187. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2187
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2187
pubmed: 33068498
Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.003
pubmed: 16376941
Khosla A, Wagner AA (2016) Robotic surgery of the kidney, bladder, and prostate. Surg Clin N Am 96(3):615–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.015
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2016.02.015
pubmed: 27261798
Rassweiler JJ, Autorino R, Klein J, Mottrie A, Goezen AS, Stolzenburg JU, Rha KH, Schurr M, Kaouk J, Patel V, Dasgupta P, Liatsikos E (2017) Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU Int 120(6):822–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13851
doi: 10.1111/bju.13851
pubmed: 28319324
Avateramedical (2022) Avaterasystem. https://www.avatera.eu/en/avatera-system
Kallidonis P, Tatanis V, Peteinaris A, Katsakiori P, Gkeka K, Faitatziadis S, Vagionis A, Vrettos T, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos E (2023) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: initial experience with the novel avatera system. World J Urol 41(11):3155–3160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04586-7
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04586-7
pubmed: 37668715
Peteinaris A, Kallidonis P, Tsaturyan A, Pagonis K, Faitatziadis S, Gkeka K, Vagionis A, Natsos A, Obaidat M, Anaplioti E, Tatanis V, Vrettos T, Liatsikos E (2023) The feasibility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an experimental study. World J Urol 41(2):477–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04266-y
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04266-y
pubmed: 36577927
Gkeka K, Tsaturyan A, Faitatziadis S, Peteinaris A, Anaplioti E, Pagonis K, Vagionis A, Tatanis V, Vrettos T, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos E (2023) Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy using the novel avatera robotic surgical system: a feasibility study in a porcine model. J Endourol 37(3):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0596
doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0596
pubmed: 36274228
Wong SW, Crowe P (2022) Factors affecting the learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery. J Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01373-1
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01373-1
pubmed: 35296977
pmcid: 9606100
https://www.auanet.org/meetings-and-education/educational-programs/e-learning
Somani BK, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Gozen AS, Skolarikos A, Wagner C, Beatty J, Barmoshe S, Gaya Sopena JM, Kalogeropoulos T, Faba OR, Salas RS, Schmidt M, Siena G, Pini G, Palou J, Geraghty R, Veneziano D (2020) Outcomes of European Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills (EBLUS) Examinations: Results from European School of Urology (ESU) and EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) over 6 Years (2013–2018). Eur Urol Focus 6(6):1190–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.007
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.007
pubmed: 30661943
(EAU) EAoU (2022) Laparoscopy. https://uroweb.org/education-events/laparoscopy
https://uroweb.org/education
Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2014) Measuring the surgical “learning curve”: methods, variables and competency. BJU Int 113(3):504–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12197
doi: 10.1111/bju.12197
pubmed: 23819461
Wiener S, Haddock P, Shichman S, Dorin R (2015) Construction of a urologic robotic surgery training curriculum: how many simulator sessions are required for residents to achieve proficiency? J Endourol 29(11):1289–1293. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0392
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0392
pubmed: 26154108
Schmidt MW, Koppinger KF, Fan C, Kowalewski KF, Schmidt LP, Vey J, Proctor T, Probst P, Bintintan VV, Muller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2021) Virtual reality simulation in robot-assisted surgery: meta-analysis of skill transfer and predictability of skill. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa066
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa066
pubmed: 33864069
pmcid: 8052560
Lovegrove CE, Elhage O, Khan MS, Novara G, Mottrie A, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2017) Training modalities in robot-assisted urologic surgery: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus 3(1):102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.006
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.006
pubmed: 28720354
Brunckhorst O, Volpe A, van der Poel H, Mottrie A, Ahmed K (2016) Training, simulation, the learning curve, and how to reduce complications in urology. Eur Urol Focus 2(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.02.004
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.02.004
pubmed: 28723441
Soomro N, Hashimoto D, Porteous A, Ridley C, Marsh W, Ditto R, Roy S (2019) Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50235
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50235
pubmed: 32011823
pmcid: 6996634
Yurko YY, Scerbo MW, Prabhu AS, Acker CE, Stefanidis D (2010) Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simul Healthc 5(5):267–271. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e3f329
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3181e3f329
pubmed: 21330808
Gauger P, Hauge L, Andreatta P, Hamstra S, Hillard M, Arble E, Kasten S, Mullan P, Cederna P, Minter R (2010) Laparoscopic simulation training with proficiency targets improves practice and performance of novice surgeons. Am J Surg 199:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.034
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.034
pubmed: 20103069
Bric J, Connolly M, Kastenmeier A, Goldblatt M, Gould JC (2014) Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum. Surg Endosc 28(12):3343–3348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3624-5
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3624-5
pubmed: 24946742
McVey R, Goldenberg MG, Bernardini MQ, Yasufuku K, Quereshy FA, Finelli A, Pace KT, Lee JY (2016) Baseline laparoscopic skill may predict baseline robotic skill and early robotic surgery learning curve. J Endourol 30(5):588–592. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0774
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0774
pubmed: 26915663
Chahal B, Aydin A, Amin MSA, Ong K, Khan A, Khan MS, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P (2023) Transfer of open and laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery: a systematic review. J Robot Surg 17(4):1207–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01492-9
pubmed: 36418717
Kassite I, Bejan-Angoulvant T, Lardy H, Binet A (2019) A systematic review of the learning curve in robotic surgery: range and heterogeneity. Surg Endosc 33(2):353–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6473-9
pubmed: 30267283
Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Raphoz AL, Levan T, Weryha G, Boissel P (2008) Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg 195(4):433–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.016
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.016
pubmed: 18304514
Leite M, Carvalho AF, Costa P, Pereira R, Moreira A, Rodrigues N, Laureano S, Correia-Pinto J, Vilaca JL, Leao P (2016) Assessment of laparoscopic skills performance: 2D versus 3D vision and classic instrument versus new hand-held robotic device for laparoscopy. Surg Innov 23(1):52–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350615585638
doi: 10.1177/1553350615585638
pubmed: 25994623
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Hernandez J, Martin S, Bello F, Rockall T, Darzi A (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18(5):790–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2
doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2
pubmed: 15216862
Munz Y, Moorthy K, Dosis A, Hernandez JD, Bann S, Bello F, Martin S, Darzi A, Rockall T (2004) The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models. Surg Endosc 18(4):611–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9017-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9017-9
pubmed: 14752629
Hopper AN, Jamison MH, Lewis WG (2007) Learning curves in surgical practice. Postgrad Med J 83(986):777–779. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190
doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2007.057190
pubmed: 18057179
pmcid: 2750931
Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME (2011) Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 78(4):813–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.065
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.065
pubmed: 21802120
https://uroweb.org/eau-sections/eau-robotic-urology-section-erus
Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22(2):313–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5 . (discussion 311–312)
doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5
pubmed: 18163170