Demand-driven design of bicycle infrastructure networks for improved urban bikeability.
Journal
Nature computational science
ISSN: 2662-8457
Titre abrégé: Nat Comput Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101775476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
received:
13
01
2022
accepted:
12
08
2022
medline:
1
10
2022
pubmed:
1
10
2022
entrez:
4
1
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cycling is crucial for sustainable urban transportation. Promoting cycling critically relies on sufficiently developed infrastructure; however, designing efficient bike path networks constitutes a complex problem that requires balancing multiple constraints. Here we propose a framework for generating efficient bike path networks, explicitly taking into account cyclists' demand distribution and route choices based on safety preferences. By reversing the network formation, we iteratively remove bike paths from an initially complete bike path network and continually update cyclists' route choices to create a sequence of networks adapted to the cycling demand. We illustrate the applicability of this demand-driven approach for two cities. A comparison of the resulting bike path networks with those created for homogenized demand enables us to quantify the importance of the demand distribution for network planning. The proposed framework may thus enable quantitative evaluation of the structure of current and planned cycling networks, and support the demand-driven design of efficient infrastructures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38177262
doi: 10.1038/s43588-022-00318-w
pii: 10.1038/s43588-022-00318-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
655-664Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : 493613373
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Références
Banister, D. The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transp. Policy 15, 73–80 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
Mazzoncini, R., Somaschini, C. & Longo, M. in Green Planning for Cities and Communities: Novel Incisive Approaches to Sustainability (ed. Dall’O’, G.) 255–277 (Springer, 2020).
Buehler, R. & Pucher, J. Cycling to work in 90 large american cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation 39, 409–432 (2011).
Creutzig, F. et al. Urban infrastructure choices structure climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1054–1056(2016).
doi: 10.1038/nclimate3169
Rhoads, D., Solé-Ribalta, A., González, M. C. & Borge-Holthoefer, J. A sustainable strategy for open streets in (post)pandemic cities. Commun. Phys. 4, 183 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s42005-021-00688-z
Schwedhelm, A., Li, W., Harms, L. & Adriazola-Steil, C. Cycling During COVID-19 (World Resources Institute, 2020); https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/04/coronavirus-biking-critical-in-cities
Goetsch, H. & Quiros, T. P. COVID-19 Creates New Momentum for Cycling and Walking. We Can’t Let it Go to Waste! (World Bank, 2020); https://blogs.worldbank.org/transport/covid-19-creates-new-momentum-cycling-and-walking-we-cant-let-it-go-waste
Jackson, M. O. Social and Economic Networks (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010).
doi: 10.2307/j.ctvcm4gh1
Schröder, M., Nagler, J., Timme, M. & Witthaut, D. Hysteretic percolation from locally optimal individual decisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 248302 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.248302
Aldous, D. & Barthelemy, M. Optimal geometry of transportation networks. Phys. Rev. E 99, 052303 (2019).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.052303
Tero, A. et al. Rules for biologically inspired adaptive network design. Science 327, 439–442 (2010).
doi: 10.1126/science.1177894
Karschau, J. et al. Resilience of three-dimensional sinusoidal networks in liver tissue. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, (2020).
Kleinberg, J. M. Navigation in a small world. Nature 406, 845 (2000).
doi: 10.1038/35022643
Molkenthin, N., Schröder, M. & Timme, M. Adhesion-induced discontinuous transitions and classifying social networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 138301 (2018).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.138301
Gastner, M. T. & Newman, M. E. J. Optimal design of spatial distribution networks. Phys. Rev. E 74, 016117 (2006).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016117
Verma, T., Russmann, F., Araújo, N. A., Nagler, J. & Herrmann, H. J. Emergence of core–peripheries in networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 10441 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10441
Barthélemy, M. & Flammini, A. Optimal traffic networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2006, L07002 (2006).
doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/07/L07002
Barthélemy, M. Spatial networks. Phys. Rep. 499, 1–101 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.002
Scellato, S., Cardillo, A., Latora, V. & Porta, S. The backbone of a city. Eur. Phys. J. B 50, 221–225 (2006).
doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2006-00066-4
Duthie, J. & Unnikrishnan, A. Optimization framework for bicycle network design. J. Transp. Eng. A 140, 04014028 (2014).
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000690
Muñoz, B., Monzon, A. & Lois, D. Cycling habits and other psychological variables affecting commuting by bicycle in Madrid, Spain. Transp. Res. Record https://doi.org/10.3141/2382-01 (2013).
Rik de Groot, H. (ed) Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic Record no. 28 (Crow, 2016).
Bushell, M. A., Poole, B. W., Zegeer, C. V. & Rodriguez, D. A. Costs for Pedestrian and Bicyclist Infrastructure Improvements Techical Report (UNC Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, 2013); https://www.pedbikeinfo.org/cms/downloads/CountermeasureCosts_Report_Nov20131.pdf
Natera Orozco, L. G., Battiston, F., Iñiguez, G. & Szell, M. Data-driven strategies for optimal bicycle network growth. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 201130 (2020).
doi: 10.1098/rsos.201130
Olmos, L. E. et al. A data science framework for planning the growth of bicycle infrastructures. Transp. Res. C 115, 102640 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102640
Szell, M., Mimar, S., Perlman, T., Ghoshal, G. & Sinatra, R. Growing urban bicycle networks. Sci. Rep. 12, 6765 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10783-y
Menghini, G., Carrasco, N., Schüssler, N. & Axhausen, K. Route choice of cyclists in Zurich. Transp. Res. A 44, 754–765 (2010).
Broach, J., Dill, J. & Gliebe, J. Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data. Transp. Res. A 46, 1730–1740 (2012).
Guerreiro, Td. C. M., Kirner Providelo, J., Pitombo, C. S., Antonio Rodrigues Ramos, R. & Rodrigues da Silva, A. N. Data-mining, GIS and multicriteria analysis in a comprehensive method for bicycle network planning and design. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 12, 179–191 (2018).
doi: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1342156
Banister, D. & Berechman, Y. Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. J. Transp. Geogr. 9, 209–218 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00013-8
Buehler, R. & Dill, J. Bikeway networks: a review of effects on cycling. Transp. Rev. 36, 9–27 (2016).
doi: 10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
Daganzo, C. F. & Sheffi, Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transp. Sci. 11, 253 (1977).
doi: 10.1287/trsc.11.3.253
Storch, D.-M., Schröder, M. & Timme, M. Traffic flow splitting from crowdsourced digital route choice support. J. Phys. Complexity 1, 035004 (2020).
doi: 10.1088/2632-072X/aba83e
Newman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113
OpenStreetMap contributors. Street Networks Retrieved From openstreetmap.org (OpenStreetMap, 2021); www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en
Kellstedt, D. K. et al. A scoping review of bikeability assessment methods. J. Commun. Health 46, 211–224 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4
Carmona, H. A., de Noronha, A. W. T., Moreira, A. A., Araújo, N. A. M. & Andrade, J. S. Cracking urban mobility. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043132 (2020).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043132
Schäfer, B., Witthaut, D., Timme, M. & Latora, V. Dynamically induced cascading failures in power grids. Nat. Commun. 9, 1975 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04287-5
Folco, P., Gauvin, L., Tizzoni, M. & Szell, M. Data-driven bicycle network planning for demand and safety. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.14619 (2022).
Boeing, G. OSMnx: new methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65, 126–139 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004
Graser, A., Straub, M. & Dragaschnig, M. Towards an open source analysis toolbox for street network comparison: indicators, tools and results of a comparison of OSM and the official Austrian reference graph. Trans. GIS 18, 510–526 (2014).
doi: 10.1111/tgis.12061
Quinn, S. & Bull, F. Geospatial Information System Use in Public Organizations 80–96 (Routledge, 2019).
OpenStreetMap contributors. Key:Highway—OSM Wiki (Wikipedia, 2022); https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Trip Data Dresden Universities (NextBike GmbH, 2020).
Buchungen Call a Bike (Stand 05/2017) (CC BY 4.0) (Deutsche Bahn, accessed 14 April 2020); https://data.deutschebahn.com/dataset/data-call-a-bike
Steinacker, C. PhysicsOfMobility/BikePathNet: Update for Supplementary Material for "Demand-driven Design of Bicycle Infrastructure Networks for Improved Urban Bikeability" (Zenodo, 2022); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6975015