What is the maximal timeframe between sperm acquisition to sperm cryopreservation, in different "culture" conditions?

Cryopreservation Post mortem Sperm Time interval Viability

Journal

Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics
ISSN: 1573-7330
Titre abrégé: J Assist Reprod Genet
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9206495

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 14 11 2023
accepted: 21 12 2023
medline: 5 1 2024
pubmed: 5 1 2024
entrez: 4 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Most of the literature about postmortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) deals with the controversies surrounding ethical and legal aspects, while the optimal time interval between the death and viable sperm acquisition is indefinite. In an attempt to aid fertility specialists, while counseling whether to pursue and adopt PMSR, we aim to explore the maximal time frame from ejaculated sperm acquisition to sperm cryopreservation in different "culture" conditions, observations that might be extrapolated to PMSR requests. Five healthy men with normal semen analysis were enrolled. The sperm specimen from each man was diluted to 6.5 mL. After extracting 0.5 mL for cryopreservation, the remaining 6 mL were divided into three tubes: one was maintained in room temperature (23-25 °C), the second in an incubator (37 °C), and the third in a refrigerator (4 °C). Thereafter, every day, a 0.5 mL of each sample was extracted, examined, and cryopreserved. A week later, all the cryopreserved samples were thawed and tested for sperm motility and viability. While at room temperature, frozen/thawed sperm were still motile (6.5%) and viable (9.9%) up to 96 h; those maintained in the refrigerator, following freezing/thawing were immotile already at 48 h in culture, but still viable (6.0%) up to 72 h in culture. Those maintained in the incubator demonstrated the worse results with negligible motility (1.5%) and viability (3.7%) following freezing/thawing, already after 48 h in culture. The timeframe cut-off between ejaculated sperm acquisition and cryopreservation should be 72 h, unless sperm was maintained at room temperature, where it might be longer. It would be prudent to check for sperm vitality prior to freezing in cases where only immotile sperms are present.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38177973
doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-03017-1
pii: 10.1007/s10815-023-03017-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Zinkel AR, Ankel FK, Milbank AJ, Casey CI, Sundheim JJ. Postmortem sperm retrieval in the emergency department: a case report and review of available guidelines. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2019;3:405–8.
doi: 10.5811/cpcem.2019.9.44472 pubmed: 31763600 pmcid: 6861034
Rothman CM. A method for obtaining viable sperm in the postmortem state. Fertil Steril. 1980;34:512.
doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45147-2 pubmed: 7439417
Belker AM, Swanson ML, Cook CL, Carrillo AJ, Yoffe SC. Live birth after sperm retrieval from a moribund man. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:841–3.
doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02013-1 pubmed: 11591426
Ovics SO, Baram S, Nothman S, Weiss A, Beck-Fruchter R. Perimortem and postmortem sperm acquisition: review of clinical data. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39:977–86.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02427-x pubmed: 35190958 pmcid: 9050980
Ilacqua A, Izzo G, Emerenziani GP, Baldari C, Aversa A. Lifestyle and fertility: the influence of stress and quality of life on male fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):115.
doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0436-9 pubmed: 30474562 pmcid: 6260894
Durairajanayagam D, Agarwal A, Ong C. Causes, effects and molecular mechanism of testicular heat stress. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;30:14–27.
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.018 pubmed: 25456164
Thomas J, Bidhan J, Ledesma BR, Bitran J, Ramasamy R. A case report on the prolonged viability of postmortem human testicular sperm. Fertil Steril Rep. 2023;4:235–8.

Auteurs

Raoul Orvieto (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Tel Hashomer), Ramat Gan, Israel. Raoul.orvieto@sheba.health.gov.il.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Raoul.orvieto@sheba.health.gov.il.
The Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, at the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Raoul.orvieto@sheba.health.gov.il.

Chen Shimon (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Tel Hashomer), Ramat Gan, Israel.

Olga Dratviman-Storobinsky (O)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Tel Hashomer), Ramat Gan, Israel.

Meirav Noach-Hirsh (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Tel Hashomer), Ramat Gan, Israel.

Adva Aizer (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center (Tel Hashomer), Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Classifications MeSH