Evaluation of the nurse-assisted eHealth intervention 'eHealth@Hospital-2-Home' on self-care by patients with heart failure and colorectal cancer post-hospital discharge: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Colorectal cancer
Heart failure
Hospital discharge
Protocol
Randomised controlled trial
Self-efficacy
eHealth
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jan 2024
04 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
27
10
2023
accepted:
20
12
2023
medline:
5
1
2024
pubmed:
5
1
2024
entrez:
4
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Patients with heart failure (HF) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are prone to comorbidity, a high rate of readmission, and complex healthcare needs. Self-care for people with HF and CRC after hospitalisation can be challenging, and patients may leave the hospital unprepared to self-manage their disease at home. eHealth solutions may be a beneficial tool to engage patients in self-care. A randomised controlled trial with an embedded evaluation of intervention engagement and cost-effectiveness will be conducted to investigate the effect of eHealth intervention after hospital discharge on the self-efficacy of self-care. Eligible patients with HF or CRC will be recruited before discharge from two Norwegian university hospitals. The intervention group will use a nurse-assisted intervention-eHealth@Hospital-2-Home-for six weeks. The intervention includes remote monitoring of vital signs; patients' self-reports of symptoms, health and well-being; secure messaging between patients and hospital-based nurse navigators; and access to specific HF and CRC health-related information. The control group will receive routine care. Data collection will take place before the intervention (baseline), at the end of the intervention (Post-1), and at six months (Post-2). The primary outcome will be self-efficacy in self-care. The secondary outcomes will include measures of burden of treatment, health-related quality of life and 30- and 90-day readmissions. Sub-study analyses are planned in the HF patient population with primary outcomes of self-care behaviour and secondary outcomes of medication adherence, and readmission at 30 days, 90 days and 6 months. Patients' and nurse navigators' engagement and experiences with the eHealth intervention and cost-effectiveness will be investigated. Data will be analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis. This protocol will examine the effects of the eHealth@ Hospital-2-Home intervention on self-care in two prevalent patient groups, HF and CRC. It will allow the exploration of a generic framework for an eHealth intervention after hospital discharge, which could be adapted to other patient groups, upscaled, and implemented into clinical practice. Clinical trials.gov (ID 301472).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients with heart failure (HF) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are prone to comorbidity, a high rate of readmission, and complex healthcare needs. Self-care for people with HF and CRC after hospitalisation can be challenging, and patients may leave the hospital unprepared to self-manage their disease at home. eHealth solutions may be a beneficial tool to engage patients in self-care.
METHODS
METHODS
A randomised controlled trial with an embedded evaluation of intervention engagement and cost-effectiveness will be conducted to investigate the effect of eHealth intervention after hospital discharge on the self-efficacy of self-care. Eligible patients with HF or CRC will be recruited before discharge from two Norwegian university hospitals. The intervention group will use a nurse-assisted intervention-eHealth@Hospital-2-Home-for six weeks. The intervention includes remote monitoring of vital signs; patients' self-reports of symptoms, health and well-being; secure messaging between patients and hospital-based nurse navigators; and access to specific HF and CRC health-related information. The control group will receive routine care. Data collection will take place before the intervention (baseline), at the end of the intervention (Post-1), and at six months (Post-2). The primary outcome will be self-efficacy in self-care. The secondary outcomes will include measures of burden of treatment, health-related quality of life and 30- and 90-day readmissions. Sub-study analyses are planned in the HF patient population with primary outcomes of self-care behaviour and secondary outcomes of medication adherence, and readmission at 30 days, 90 days and 6 months. Patients' and nurse navigators' engagement and experiences with the eHealth intervention and cost-effectiveness will be investigated. Data will be analysed according to intention-to-treat principles. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This protocol will examine the effects of the eHealth@ Hospital-2-Home intervention on self-care in two prevalent patient groups, HF and CRC. It will allow the exploration of a generic framework for an eHealth intervention after hospital discharge, which could be adapted to other patient groups, upscaled, and implemented into clinical practice.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Clinical trials.gov (ID 301472).
Identifiants
pubmed: 38178097
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10508-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-10508-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18Subventions
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Organisme : Norges Forskningsråd
ID : 301472
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Dineen-Griffin S, Garcia-Cardenas V, Williams K, Benrimoj SI. Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice. Leroyer C, editor. PLOS One. 2019;14(8):e0220116.
pubmed: 31369582
pmcid: 6675068
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220116
Narasimhan M, Kapila M. Implications of self-care for health service provision. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(2):76-76A.
pubmed: 30728611
pmcid: 6357575
doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.228890
Saelendsminde K, Line TM, Olsen CB. Samfunnskostnader ved sykdom og ulykker 2015 Sykdomsbyrde, helsetjenestekostnader og produksjonstap fordelt på sykdomsgrupper. 2015. Report No.: IS-2839. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/rapporter/samfunnskostnader-ved-sykdom-og-ulykker/Samfunnskostnader%20ved%20sykdom%20og%20ulykker%202015.pdf/_/attachment/inline/761dd2be-6458-4baf-99c9-34d58a621aad:e3291994cf460a6d1c5174eab5f27b4165208afe/Samfunnskostnader%20ved%20sykdom%20og%20ulykker%202015.pdf . Accessed 27 Dec 2023.
Kvåle R. Folkehelseinstituttet. 2021 [cited 2023 Oct 16]. Forekomst av hjerte- og karsykdommer i 2020. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/is/hjertekar2/forekomst-av-hjerte--og-karsykdommer-i-2020/ .
Groenewegen A, Rutten FH, Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Epidemiology of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(8):1342–56.
pubmed: 32483830
doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1858
Høydahl Ø, Edna TH, Xanthoulis A, Lydersen S, Endreseth BH. Long-term trends in colorectal cancer: incidence, localization, and presentation. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1077.
pubmed: 33167924
pmcid: 7653698
doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07582-x
Ang CW, Seretis C, Wanigasooriya K, Mahadik Y, Singh J, Chapman MAS. The most frequent cause of 90-day unplanned hospital readmission following colorectal cancer resection is chemotherapy complications. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(9):779–86.
pubmed: 25765143
doi: 10.1111/codi.12945
Khan MS, Sreenivasan J, Lateef N, Abougergi MS, Greene SJ, Ahmad T, et al. Trends in 30- and 90-Day Readmission Rates for Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2021;14(4):e008335.
pubmed: 33866827
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008335
Wideqvist M, Cui X, Magnusson C, Schaufelberger M, Fu M. Hospital readmissions of patients with heart failure from real world: timing and associated risk factors. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8(2):1388–97.
pubmed: 33599109
pmcid: 8006673
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13221
Ramani GV, Uber PA, Mehra MR. Chronic Heart Failure: Contemporary Diagnosis and Management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(2):180–95.
pubmed: 20118395
pmcid: 2813829
doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0494
Qaderi SM, Swartjes H, Vromen H, Bremers AJA, Custers JAE, De Wilt JHW. Acceptability, quality of life and cost overview of a remote follow-up plan for patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(7):1637–44.
pubmed: 33423826
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.12.018
Zaharova S, Litwack K, Gopalakrishnan S, Ellis J, Saltzberg MT. Self-management in Heart Failure: The Importance of Self-regulation but not Complexity of Condition. West J Nurs Res. 2022;44(4):375–82.
pubmed: 33709833
doi: 10.1177/0193945921997428
Lo PS, Lin YP, Hsu HH, Chang SC, Yang SP, Huang WC, et al. Health self-management experiences of colorectal cancer patients in postoperative recovery: A qualitative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021;51:101906.
pubmed: 33601194
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101906
Nordfonn OK, Morken IM, Lunde Husebø AM. A qualitative study of living with the burden from heart failure treatment: Exploring the patient capacity for self-care. Nurs Open. 2020;7(3):804–13.
pubmed: 32257268
pmcid: 7113501
doi: 10.1002/nop2.455
Wathne H, Morken IM, Storm M, Husebø AML. Designing a Future eHealth Service for Posthospitalization Self-management Support in Long-term Illness: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023;10:e39391.
pubmed: 36745492
pmcid: 9941902
doi: 10.2196/39391
Husebø AML. Stakeholders’ Perspectives on eHealth Support in Colorectal Cancer Survivorship: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Cancer. 2021;7(3):e28279.
pubmed: 34491210
pmcid: 8456333
doi: 10.2196/28279
Xiao Y. The ‘expert patient’ approach for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income settings: When the reality confronts the rhetoric. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015;1(3):145–51.
pubmed: 29063000
pmcid: 5643575
Storm M, Siemsen IMD, Laugaland KA, Dyrstad DN, Aase K. Quality in transitional care of the elderly: Key challenges and relevant improvement measures. Int J Integr Care. 2014;14(2). Available from: http://www.ijic.org/article/10.5334/ijic.1194/ . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Nordfonn OK, Morken IM, Bru LE, Husebø AML. Patients’ experience with heart failure treatment and self-care—A qualitative study exploring the burden of treatment. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(9–10):1782–93.
pubmed: 30667120
doi: 10.1111/jocn.14799
Martin LR, Williams SL, Haskard KB, DiMatteo MR. The challenge of patient adherence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2005;1(3):189–99.
pubmed: 18360559
pmcid: 1661624
Rosen OZ, Fridman R, Rosen BT, Shane R, Pevnick JM. Medication adherence as a predictor of 30-day hospital readmissions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:801–10.
pubmed: 28461742
pmcid: 5404806
doi: 10.2147/PPA.S125672
Silavanich V, Nathisuwan S, Phrommintikul A, Permsuwan U. Relationship of medication adherence and quality of life among heart failure patients. Heart Lung. 2019;48(2):105–10.
pubmed: 30384984
doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2018.09.009
Lippiett KA, Richardson A, Myall M, Cummings A, May CR. Patients and informal caregivers’ experiences of burden of treatment in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2019;9(2):e020515.
pubmed: 30813114
pmcid: 6377510
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020515
May CR, Eton DT, Boehmer K, Gallacher K, Hunt K, MacDonald S, et al. Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):281.
pubmed: 24969758
pmcid: 4080515
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-281
Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37(1):53–72.
pubmed: 10158943
doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48(2):177–87.
pubmed: 12401421
doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00032-0
Riegel B, Dickson VV, Faulkner KM. The Situation-Specific Theory of Heart Failure Self-Care: Revised and Updated. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31(3):226–35.
pubmed: 25774844
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000244
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215.
pubmed: 847061
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):e20.
pubmed: 11720962
pmcid: 1761894
doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20
Shaw T, McGregor D, Brunner M, Keep M, Janssen A, Barnet S. What is eHealth (6)? Development of a Conceptual Model for eHealth: Qualitative Study with Key Informants. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(10):e324.
pubmed: 29066429
pmcid: 5676031
doi: 10.2196/jmir.8106
Radhakrishnan K, Jacelon C. Impact of Telehealth on Patient Self-management of Heart Failure: A Review of Literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2012;27(1):33–43.
pubmed: 21558862
doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e318216a6e9
Odeh B, Kayyali R, Nabhani-Gebara S, Philip N. Optimizing cancer care through mobile health. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(7):2183–8.
pubmed: 25649121
doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2627-7
Xu A, Wang Y, Wu X. Effectiveness of e-health based self-management to improve cancer-related fatigue, self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2019;75(12):3434–47.
pubmed: 31566769
doi: 10.1111/jan.14197
Su JJ, Yu DS. Effects of a nurse-led eHealth cardiac rehabilitation programme on health outcomes of patients with coronary heart disease: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;122:104040.
pubmed: 34333211
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104040
Morken IM, Storm M, Søreide JA, Urstad KH, Karlsen B, Husebø AML. Posthospitalization Follow-Up of Patients With Heart Failure Using eHealth Solutions: Restricted Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(2):e32946.
pubmed: 35166680
pmcid: 8889479
doi: 10.2196/32946
Chan RJ, Crichton M, Crawford-Williams F, Agbejule OA, Yu K, Hart NH, et al. The efficacy, challenges, and facilitators of telemedicine in post-treatment cancer survivorship care: an overview of systematic reviews. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1552–70.
pubmed: 34509615
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.001
Barbieri M, Richardson G, Paisley S. The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies after cancer treatment: a systematic literature review. Br Med Bull. 2018;126(1):85–100.
pubmed: 29659715
doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy011
Albert NM, Barnason S, Deswal A, Hernandez A, Kociol R, Lee E, et al. Transitions of Care in Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(2):384–409.
pubmed: 25604605
doi: 10.1161/HHF.0000000000000006
Husebø AML, Søreide JA, Kørner H, Storm M, Wathne H, Richardson A, et al. eHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients’ self-management after discharge from surgery – an integrative literature review. Support Care Cancer. 2023;32(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08191-7 .
Husebø AML, Storm M, Morken IM, Espeland J, Hagen LG, Karlsen B. Discussing a Nurse Assisted eHealth Service From Hospital to Home. In: 2019 International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob). 2019. p. 1–6. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8923545 . Cited 2023 Oct 18.
AS. Dignio Connected Care. 2022. Available from: https://dignio.com/ . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, Craig P, Baird J, Blazeby JM, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.
Morken IM, Wathne HB, Karlsen B, Storm M, Nordfonn OK, Gjeilo KH, et al. Assessing a nurse-assisted eHealth intervention posthospital discharge in adult patients with non-communicable diseases: a protocol for a feasibility study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(8):e069599.
pubmed: 37536967
pmcid: 10401255
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069599
Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, Hróbjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin J, Doré C, Parulekar W, Summerskill W, Groves T, Schulz K, Sox H, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.
pubmed: 23295957
pmcid: 5114123
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Int Med. 2010;152(11):726–32.
pubmed: 20335313
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
Smith JD, Li DH, Rafferty MR. The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):84.
pubmed: 32988389
pmcid: 7523057
doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8
Quirke P, Williams GT, Ectors N, Ensari A, Piard F, Nagtegaal I. The future of the TNM staging system in colorectal cancer: time for a debate? Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(7):651–7.
pubmed: 17613427
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70205-X
Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.
pubmed: 19638912
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
University of Stavanger. eHealth @ Hospital-2-Home. Available from: https://www.uis.no/en/research/ehealth-hospital-2-home . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract ECP. 2001;4(6):256–62.
pubmed: 11769298
Eton DT, Yost KJ, Lai JS, Ridgeway JL, Egginton JS, Rosedahl JK, et al. Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(2):489–503.
pubmed: 27566732
doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1397-0
Husebø AML, Morken IM, Eriksen KS, Nordfonn OK. The patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS) questionnaire: translation and cultural adaption of the Norwegian version. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):147.
pubmed: 30463519
pmcid: 6249780
doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0612-9
Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(1):102–7.
pubmed: 23768763
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009
Forcino RC, Barr PJ, O’Malley AJ, Arend R, Castaldo MG, Ozanne EM, et al. Using CollaboRATE, a brief patient-reported measure of shared decision making: Results from three clinical settings in the United States. Health Expect. 2018;21(1):82–9.
pubmed: 28678426
doi: 10.1111/hex.12588
Karlsen B, Idsoe T, Hanestad B, Murberg T, Bru E. Perceptions of support, diabetes-related coping and psychological well-being in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Psychol Health Med. 2004;9(1):53–70.
doi: 10.1080/13548500310001637751
Oftedal B, Bru E, Karlsen B. Social support as a motivator of self-management among adults with type 2 diabetes: Social support and motivation among adults with type 2 diabetes. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn. 2011;3(1):12–22.
doi: 10.1111/j.1752-9824.2010.01074.x
Cohn J, Cleland JGF, Lubsen J, Borer JS, Steg PG, Perelman M, et al. Unconventional End Points in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: Should We Be Moving Away From Morbidity and Mortality? J Card Fail. 2009;15(3):199–205.
pubmed: 19327621
doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.10.029
Jaarsma T, Årestedt KF, Mårtensson J, Dracup K, Strömberg A. The European Heart Failure Self-care Behaviour scale revised into a nine-item scale (EHFScB-9): a reliable and valid international instrument. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11(1):99–105.
pubmed: 19147463
doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfn007
Thompson K, Kulkarni J, Sergejew AA. Reliability and validity of a new Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) for the psychoses. Schizophr Res. 2000;42(3):241–7.
pubmed: 10785582
doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(99)00130-9
Drivenes K, Haaland VØ, Mesel T, Tanum L. Practitioners’ positive attitudes promote shared decision-making in mental health care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(6):1041–9.
pubmed: 31508872
doi: 10.1111/jep.13275
Stamford J, Kambhampati C, Pauws S, Clark AL. Patients on Home Telehealth Monitoring have more Days Alive and Out of Hospital. In: 2nd IET International Conference on Technologies for Active and Assisted Living (TechAAL 2016). London, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology; 2016. p. 7 (7 .)-7 (7 .). Available from: https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/conferences/10.1049/ic.2016.0056 . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Barello S, Triberti S, Graffigna G, Libreri C, Serino S, Hibbard J, et al. eHealth for Patient Engagement: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2016;6. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02013 . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies : evidence for action [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2003. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42682 . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Lewis EF, Coles TM, Lewis S, Nelson LM, Barrett A, Romano CD, et al. Development, psychometric evaluation, and initial feasibility assessment of a symptom tracker for use by patients with heart failure (HFaST). J Patient-Rep Outcomes. 2019;3(1):26.
pubmed: 31049726
pmcid: 6497706
doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0113-6
Lewis JR. Psychometric Evaluation of the PSSUQ Using Data from Five Years of Usability Studies. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 2002;14(3–4):463–88.
doi: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC143&4_11
University of Oslo. Services for sensitive data (TSD). 2022. Available from: https://www.uio.no/english/services/it/research/sensitive-data/index.html . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2021.
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston: RStudio, PBC; 2020. Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/ . Accessed 27 Dec 2023.
Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic Analysis. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research-in-psychology-second-edition . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Lumivero. Lumivero. NVivo. Available from: https://lumivero.com/products/nvivo/ . Cited 2023 Sep 20.
Goodyear MDE, Krleza-Jeric K, Lemmens T. The Declaration of Helsinki. BMJ. 2007;335(7621):624–5.
pubmed: 17901471
pmcid: 1995496
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39339.610000.BE