Comparing quality indicator rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care before and during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Home care
Palliative and end-of-life care
Quality indicators
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jan 2024
05 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
20
09
2023
accepted:
22
12
2023
medline:
5
1
2024
pubmed:
5
1
2024
entrez:
4
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The consensus among Canadians with regards to end-of-life preferences is that with adequate support the majority prefer to live and die at home. To compare quality indicator (QI) rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care prior to and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective population-based cohort design was used. Sixteen QIs informed by existing literature and a preliminary set of QIs recently evaluated by a modified Delphi panel were compared. Data were obtained from the interRAI Palliative Care instrument for Ontario home care clients for two separate cohorts: the pre-COVID (January 14, 2019 to March 16, 2020) and COVID cohort (March 17, 2020 to May 18, 2021). A propensity score analysis was used to match (using nearest neighbour matching) on 21 covariates, resulting in a sample size of 2479 unique interRAI Palliative Care assessments in each cohort. Alternative propensity score methods were explored as part of a sensitivity analysis. After matching the pre-COVID and COVID cohorts, five of the 16 QIs had statistically significant differences in the QI rates (change from pre-COVID to COVID): decrease in prevalence of severe or excruciating daily pain (p = 0.03, effect size=-0.08), decrease in prevalence of caregiver distress (p = 0.02, effect size=-0.06), decrease in prevalence of negative mood (p = 0.003, effect size=- 0.17), decrease in prevalence of a delirium-like syndrome (p = 0.001, effect size=-0.25) and decrease in prevalence of nausea or vomiting (p = 0.04, effect size=-0.06). While the alternative propensity score methods produced slightly different results, no clinically meaningful differences were seen between the cohorts when effect sizes were examined. All methods were in agreement regarding the highest QI rates, which included the prevalence of shortness of breath with activity, no advance directives, and fatigue. This study is the first to examine differences in QI rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care before and during COVID in Ontario. It appears that QI rates did not change over the course of the pandemic in this population. Future work should be directed to understanding the temporal variation in these QI rates, risk-adjusting the QI rates for further comparison among jurisdictions, provinces, and countries, and in creating benchmarks for determining acceptable rates of different QIs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The consensus among Canadians with regards to end-of-life preferences is that with adequate support the majority prefer to live and die at home.
PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE
To compare quality indicator (QI) rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care prior to and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective population-based cohort design was used. Sixteen QIs informed by existing literature and a preliminary set of QIs recently evaluated by a modified Delphi panel were compared. Data were obtained from the interRAI Palliative Care instrument for Ontario home care clients for two separate cohorts: the pre-COVID (January 14, 2019 to March 16, 2020) and COVID cohort (March 17, 2020 to May 18, 2021). A propensity score analysis was used to match (using nearest neighbour matching) on 21 covariates, resulting in a sample size of 2479 unique interRAI Palliative Care assessments in each cohort. Alternative propensity score methods were explored as part of a sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
After matching the pre-COVID and COVID cohorts, five of the 16 QIs had statistically significant differences in the QI rates (change from pre-COVID to COVID): decrease in prevalence of severe or excruciating daily pain (p = 0.03, effect size=-0.08), decrease in prevalence of caregiver distress (p = 0.02, effect size=-0.06), decrease in prevalence of negative mood (p = 0.003, effect size=- 0.17), decrease in prevalence of a delirium-like syndrome (p = 0.001, effect size=-0.25) and decrease in prevalence of nausea or vomiting (p = 0.04, effect size=-0.06). While the alternative propensity score methods produced slightly different results, no clinically meaningful differences were seen between the cohorts when effect sizes were examined. All methods were in agreement regarding the highest QI rates, which included the prevalence of shortness of breath with activity, no advance directives, and fatigue.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first to examine differences in QI rates for home care clients receiving palliative and end-of-life care before and during COVID in Ontario. It appears that QI rates did not change over the course of the pandemic in this population. Future work should be directed to understanding the temporal variation in these QI rates, risk-adjusting the QI rates for further comparison among jurisdictions, provinces, and countries, and in creating benchmarks for determining acceptable rates of different QIs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38178110
doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01336-9
pii: 10.1186/s12904-023-01336-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Home Care Ontario. More Home Care For Me And You: Preparing Ontario’s Home Care System for the Challenges of Tomorrow [Internet], Hamilton ON. ; 2018 p. 1–18. Available from: https://www.homecareontario.ca/docs/default-source/position-papers/home-care-ontario-more-home-care-for-me-and-you-february-28-2018 .pdf?sfvrsn = 16.
Griebeler Cordeiro FR, Oliveira S, Zeppini Giudice J, Pellegrini Fernandes V, Timm Oliveira A. Definitions for palliative care, end-of-life and terminally ill in oncology: a scoping review. Enfermería: Cuidados Humanizados. 2020;9(2):205–28.
Brazil K, McAiney C, Caron-O’Brien M, Kelley ML, O’Krafka P, Sturdy-Smith C. Quality End-of-Life Care in Long-Term Care facilities: Service Providers’ perspective. J Palliat Care. 2004;20(2):85–92.
doi: 10.1177/082585970402000204
pubmed: 15332472
Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gysels M, Hall S, Higginson IJ. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:7.
doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-7
pubmed: 23414145
pmcid: 3623898
Gomes B, Calanzani N, Curiale V, McCrone P, Higginson IJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced Illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6. CD007760.
Maetens A, Beernaert K, Schreye RD, Faes K, Annemans L, Pardon K, et al. Impact of palliative home care support on the quality and costs of care at the end of life: a population-level matched cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e025180.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025180
pubmed: 30670524
pmcid: 6347879
Davis MP, Temel JS, Balboni T, Glare P. A review of the trials which examine early integration of outpatient and home palliative care for patients with serious illnesses. Annals of Palliative Medicine. 2015;4(3):9921–9121.
Brian Cassel J, Kerr KM, McClish DK, Skoro N, Johnson S, Wanke C, et al. Effect of a home-based Palliative Care Program on Healthcare Use and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(11):2288–95.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.14354
pubmed: 27590922
pmcid: 5118096
World Health Organization. Why palliative care is an essential function of primary health care [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/328101/WHO-HIS-SDS-2018.39-eng.pdf .
Health Quality Ontario. Palliative care at the end of life: Report update 2019. 2019;1–17.
Health Quality Ontario. Palliative care at the end of life [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Sep 26]. Available from: http://www.hqontario.ca/portals/0/documents/system-performance/palliative-care-report-en.pdf .
Government of Canada. Government of Canada – Action for Seniors report [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/seniors-action-report.html#tc2a .
Fowler R, Hammer M. End-of-life care in Canada. Clin Invest Med. 2013;36(3):127–32.
doi: 10.25011/cim.v36i3.19723
Government of Canada. Government of Canada. 2020. Aging and chronic diseases: A profile of Canadian seniors. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en.html .
Canadian Institute for Health Information. Access to Palliative Care in Canada. 2018; Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/access-palliative-care-2018-en-web.pdf .
Aldridge MD, Franzosa E, Kim P, Xu E, Reckrey J, Zhang M, et al. Disruptions in Home Hospice Care due to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Palliat Med. 2023;26(2):244–7.
doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0037
pubmed: 36394438
Canadian Institute for Health Information. COVID-19’s impact on home care [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/covid-19-resources/impact-of-covid-19-on-canadas-health-care-systems/covid-19s-impact-on-home-care .
Sinn CLJ, Sultan H, Turcotte LA, McArthur C, Hirdes JP. Patterns of home care assessment and service provision before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3):e0266160.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266160
pubmed: 35353856
pmcid: 8966998
Ersek M, Smith D, Griffin H, Carpenter JG, Feder SL, Shreve ST, et al. End-Of-Life Care in the Time of COVID-19: communication matters more than ever. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2021;62(2):213–222e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.12.024
Health Canada HE, Canada, Cancer CPA, Canadian Home Care Association, Canada P. Canadian Virtual Hospice. Home and community-based palliative care shaping the future from lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://cdnhomecare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Home-and-Community-based-Palliative-Care-Shaping-the-Future-from-Lessons-Learned-during-the-COVID-19-Pandemic_JUN25.pdf .
Shoukat A, Wells CR, Langley JM, Singer BH, Galvani AP, Moghadas SM. Projecting demand for critical care beds during COVID-19 outbreaks in Canada. CMAJ. 2020;192(19):E489–96.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200457
pubmed: 32269020
pmcid: 7234264
Bowers B, Pollock K, Oldman C, Barclay S. End-of-life care during COVID-19: opportunities and challenges for community nursing. Br J Community Nurs. 2020;26(1):44–6.
doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2021.26.1.44
Lapid MI, Koopmans R, Sampson EL, Van den Block L, Peisah C. Providing quality end-of-life care to older people in the era of COVID-19: perspectives from five countries. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;1–8.
Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians. How to improve palliative care in Canada: A call to action for federal, provincial, territorial, regional and local decision-makers [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://www.cspcp.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Full-Report-How-to-Improve-Palliative-Care-in-Canada-FINAL-Nov-2016.pdf .
Quentin W, Partanen VM, Brownwood I, Klazinga N. Measuring healthcare quality [Internet]. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies [Internet]. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2019 [cited 2021 May 23]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549260/ .
Barrett D, Noble H. What are cohort studies? Evid Based Nurs. 2019;22(4):95–6.
doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103183
pubmed: 31439639
Earle CC, Ayanian JZ. Looking back from death: the value of retrospective studies of end-of-life care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(6):838–40.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9388
pubmed: 16484691
Smith TF, Steel K, Fries BE, Morris JN, Bellville-Topinkova P, Curtin-Telegdi N et al. InterRAI palliative care (PC) assessment form and user’s manual, 9.1. Washington, D.C.; 2010.
Wagner A, Schaffert R, Möckli N, Zúñiga F, Dratva J. Home care quality indicators based on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC): a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):366.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05238-x
pubmed: 32349757
pmcid: 7191714
Steel K, Ljunggren G, Topinková E, Morris JN, Vitale C, Parzuchowski J, et al. The RAI-PC: an assessment instrument for palliative care in all settings. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2003;20(3):211–9.
doi: 10.1177/104990910302000311
pubmed: 12785043
Cook RJ, Berg K, Lee KA, Poss JW, Hirdes JP, Stolee P. Rehabilitation in home care is associated with functional improvement and preferred discharge. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(6):1038–47.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.024
pubmed: 23385108
Rodrigues G. Ontario government declares state of emergency amid coronavirus pandemic. Global News [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 26]; Available from: https://globalnews.ca/news/6688074/ontario-doug-ford-coronavirus-covid-19-march-17/ .
Guthrie DM, Williams N, Beach C, Buzath E, Cohen J, Declercq A, et al. A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(4):e0266569.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569
pubmed: 35390091
pmcid: 8989210
Ferrell BR, Twaddle ML, Melnick A, Meier DE. National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care Guidelines, 4th Edition. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2018;21(12):1684–9.
Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med. 2008;27(12):2037–49.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3150
pubmed: 18038446
Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279–82.
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
pubmed: 23997866
pmcid: 3444174
Hirdes JP, Frijters DH, Teare GF. The MDS-CHESS scale: a new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(1):96–100.
doi: 10.1034/j.1601-5215.2002.51017.x
pubmed: 12534853
Stuart EA, Lee BK, Leacy FP. Prognostic score-based balance measures can be a useful diagnostic for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8 Suppl):S84-S90.e1.
Austin PC, Xin Yu AY, Vyas MV, Kapral MK. Applying propensity score methods in Clinical Research in Neurology. Neurology. 2021;97(18):856–63.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012777
pubmed: 34504033
pmcid: 8610625
Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011;10(2):150–61.
doi: 10.1002/pst.433
pubmed: 20925139
Austin PC, Cafri G. Variance estimation when using propensity-score matching with replacement with survival or time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med. 2020;39(11):1623–40.
doi: 10.1002/sim.8502
pubmed: 32109319
pmcid: 7217182
Li L, Greene T. A weighting analogue to pair matching in propensity score analysis. Int J Biostat. 2013;9(2):215–34.
doi: 10.1515/ijb-2012-0030
pubmed: 23902694
Griefer N. Matching Methods in R. 2022. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MatchIt/vignettes/matching-methods.html .
Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing covariates via Propensity score weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2018;113(521):390–400.
doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1260466
Garrido MM, Kelley AS, Paris J, Roza K, Meier DE, Morrison RS, et al. Methods for constructing and assessing propensity scores. Health Serv Res. 2014;49(5):1701–20.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182
pubmed: 24779867
pmcid: 4213057
Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(1):3–15.
doi: 10.1177/096228029900800102
pubmed: 10347857
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.
Barbera L, Seow H, Sutradhar R, Chu A, Burge F, Fassbender K, et al. Quality indicators of end-of-life care in patients with cancer: what rate is right? JOP. 2015;11(3):e279–87.
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.004416
pubmed: 25922219
Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ, Block S. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(6):1133–8.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.059
pubmed: 12637481
Canadian Cancer Society. Right to Care: Palliative care for all Canadians [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.cancer.ca/~/media/cancer.ca/CW/get%20involved/take%20action/Palliative-care-report-2016-EN.pdf?la=en .
Williams N, Boumans N, Luymes N, White NE, Lemonde M, Guthrie DM. What should be measured to assess the quality of community-based palliative care? Results from a collaborative expert workshop. Palliat Support Care. 2021;1–7.
Wasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a World Beyond p < 0.05. Am Stat. 2019;73(sup1):1–19.
doi: 10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
Valentine J, Cooper H. Effect Size Substantive Interpretation Guidelines: Issues in the Interpretation of Effect Sizes. 2003 [cited 2022 Jun 6]; Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Effect-Size Substantive-Interpretation-Guidelines-%3A-Valentine-Cooper/57fab4cc00df4d543ce7eb91decaf55cfd778fe4.
Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Weeks JC, Block SD, et al. Evaluating claims-based indicators of the intensity of end-of-life cancer care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(6):505–9.
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi061
pubmed: 15985505
Barbera L, Seow H, Sutradhar R, Chu A, Burge F, Fassbender K, et al. Quality of end-of-life cancer care in Canada: a retrospective four-province study using administrative health care data. Curr Oncol. 2015;22(5):341–55.
doi: 10.3747/co.22.2636
pubmed: 26628867
pmcid: 4608400
Bland M. Sample size for clinical trials [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www-users.york.ac.uk/~mb55/msc/trials/sampsz.htm .