Quality assessment of patient-reported outcome measures for patients with multiple ear complaints.
COSMIN
PROM
otology
quality assessment
questionnaire
Journal
Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery
ISSN: 1749-4486
Titre abrégé: Clin Otolaryngol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101247023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Jan 2024
04 Jan 2024
Historique:
revised:
14
11
2023
received:
24
01
2023
accepted:
16
12
2023
medline:
5
1
2024
pubmed:
5
1
2024
entrez:
5
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
There is an increased demand for well-validated PROMs in otology. This study will systematically assess the methodological quality of all published patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) for patients with multiple ear complaints and to identify the best suitable PROM for use by clinicians treating patients with multiple ear complaints. An extensive systematic mapping review of all otology questionnaires was performed to identify questionnaires measuring multiple ear complaints. The 'Consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement Instruments' (COSMIN) checklists were used to evaluate the quality of the questionnaire by two researchers. The worst item score per aspect of the methodological assessment counted. Twelve multiple-complaint questionnaires were included in the study for quality assessment. Ten questionnaires were disease-specific (COMQ-12, CES, ZCMEI-21, MD-POSI, PAN-QOL, ETDQ-7, MDOQ, GYSSCDQ, COMOT-15 and DEU-MDDS). Two questionnaires were ear domain-specific (OQUA and COQOL). The majority of multiple complaint questionnaires lacked good design with concept elicitation and patient involvement. For the majority of questionnaires, the quality assessment was inadequate as only a few authors consulted with patients affected by the complaints in the development. Modifications of earlier versions of PROMS or combinations of multiple questionnaires lead to ongoing (cross-cultural) validation of these questionnaires albeit mediocre design and validation. The two domain-specific questionnaires are the COQOL and OQUA, both with adequate quality but different focus. COOQL to quantify the quality of life and OQUA to measure and evaluate the severity and impact of ear complaints.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Otolaryngology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
World Health Organization. ICF. International classification of functioning, Ddsability and health. Geneva. 2001.
Bentler RA, Kramer SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear. 2000;21(4 Suppl):37S-49S.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:2.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539-549.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-745.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health status measurement instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:82.
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RW, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651-657.
Viergever K, Kraak JT, Bruinewoud EM, Ket JCF, Kramer SE, Merkus P. Questionnaires in otology: a systematic mapping review. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):119.
Gagnier JJ, Lai J, Mokkink LB, Terwee CB. COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(8):2197-2218.
Kleindienst SJ, Zapala DA, Nielsen DW, Griffith JW, Rishiq D, Lundy L, et al. Development and initial validation of a consumer questionnaire to predict the presence of ear disease. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(10):983-989.
Weinstein BE. Tool kit for screening otologic function of older adults. Am J Audiol. 2013;22(1):179-182.
Jacobson GP, Piker EG, Hatton K, Watford KE, Trone T, McCaslin DL, et al. Development and preliminary findings of the dizziness symptom profile. Ear Hear. 2019;40(3):568-576.
Mikkelsen KS, Ovesen T, Swan CZ. Pre- and post-operative dizziness, tinnitus, and taste disturbances among cochlear implant recipients. J Laryngol Otol. 2017;131(4):309-315.
Baumann I, Kurpiers B, Plinkert PK, Praetorius M. Development and validation of the chronic otitis media outcome test 15 (COMOT-15). Measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media. HNO. 2009;57(9):889-895.
Lailach S, Schenke T, Baumann I, Walter H, Praetorius M, Beleites T, et al. Development and validation of the Stapesplasty outcome test 25 (SPOT-25). HNO. 2017;65(12):973-980.
McCoul ED, Anand VK, Christos PJ. Validating the clinical assessment of eustachian tube dysfunction: the Eustachian tube dysfunction questionnaire (ETDQ-7). Laryngoscope. 2012;122(5):1137-1141.
Shaffer BT, Cohen MS, Bigelow DC, Ruckenstein MJ. Validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument for acoustic neuroma: the Penn acoustic neuroma quality-of-life scale. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(8):1646-1654.
Kato BM, LaRouere MJ, Bojrab DI, Michaelides EM. Evaluating quality of life after endolymphatic sac surgery: the Ménière's disease outcomes questionnaire. Otol Neurotol. 2004;25:339-344.
Murphy MP, Gates GA. Measuring the effects of Meniere's disease: results of the patient-oriented severity index (MD POSI) version 1. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(4):331-337.
Mutlu B, Kirkim G, Mungan Durankaya S, Gurkan S, Basokcu TO, Guneri EA. The reliability and validity of “Dokuz Eylul University Meniere's disease disability scale”. J Int Adv Otol. 2018;14(2):304-311.
Voth BL, Sheppard JP, Barnette NE, Ong V, Nguyen T, Jacky Chen CH, et al. The Gopen-Yang superior Semicircular Canal dehiscence questionnaire: development and validation of a clinical questionnaire to assess subjective symptoms in patients undergoing surgical repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. J Laryngol Otol. 2018;132(12):1110-1118.
Nadol JB Jr, Staecker H, Gliklich RE. Outcomes assessment for chronic otitis media: the chronic ear survey. Laryngoscope. 2000;110(3 Pt 3):32-35.
Bächinger D, Röösli C, Ditzen B, Huber AM. Development and validation of the Zurich chronic middle ear inventory (ZCMEI-21): an electronic questionnaire for assessing quality of life in patients with chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L. 2016;273(10):3073-3081.
Phillips JS, Haggard M, Yung M. A new health-related quality of life measure for active chronic otitis media (COMQ-12): development and initial validation. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(3):454-458.
Martin TPC, Moualed D, Paul A, Ronan N, Tysome JR, Donnelly NPD, et al. The Cambridge otology quality of life questionnaire: an otologyspecific patient-reported outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and report of preliminart reliability and validity. Clin Otolaryngol. 2015;40:13-139.
Bruinewoud EM, Kraak JT, van Leeuwen LM, Kramer SE, Merkus P. The otology questionnaire Amsterdam: a generic patient reported outcome measure about the severity and impact of ear complaints. A cross-sectional study on the development of this questionnaire. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(1):240-248.
Chan EKH, Edwards TC, Haywood K, Mikles SP, Newton L. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a companion guide to the ISOQOL user's guide. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(3):621-627.
Snyder CF, Aaronson NK, Choucair AK, Elliott TE, Greenhalgh J, Halyard MY, et al. Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(8):1305-1314.
Donaldson G. Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(10):1303-1313.
Susan E, Embretson SPR. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. 2000.