An exploratory study of psychosis risk factors in individuals who are referred but do not meet criteria for an early intervention in psychosis service.
Early intervention in psychosis
at-risk mental state
clinical high risk
first-episode psychosis
youth mental health
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jan 2024
05 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline:
5
1
2024
pubmed:
5
1
2024
entrez:
5
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The 'at-risk mental state' (ARMS) for psychosis has been critiqued for its limited prognostic ability and identification of a limited proportion of those who will develop a first episode of psychosis (FEP). Broadening the search for high-risk groups is key to improving population-level ascertainment of psychosis risk. To explore risk enrichment in diagnostic, demographic and socio-functional domains among individuals referred to an early intervention in psychosis (EIP) service not meeting ARMS or FEP criteria. A retrospective file review of 16 years of referrals to a tertiary EIP service in Ireland was undertaken. Diagnostic outcomes from standardised assessments (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM), demographic (age, gender, family history, nationality) and socio-occupational (relationship status, living status, working status) variables were compiled for those not meeting criteria. These were compared with individuals diagnosed with an FEP in the same period. From 2005 to 2021 inclusive, of 2025 index assessments, 27.6% ( This group is enriched for psychosis risk factors. They are a larger group than those meeting ARMS criteria, a finding that may reflect EIP service configuration. They may be an important focus for further study in the search for at-risk populations beyond the current ARMS model.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The 'at-risk mental state' (ARMS) for psychosis has been critiqued for its limited prognostic ability and identification of a limited proportion of those who will develop a first episode of psychosis (FEP). Broadening the search for high-risk groups is key to improving population-level ascertainment of psychosis risk.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
To explore risk enrichment in diagnostic, demographic and socio-functional domains among individuals referred to an early intervention in psychosis (EIP) service not meeting ARMS or FEP criteria.
METHOD
METHODS
A retrospective file review of 16 years of referrals to a tertiary EIP service in Ireland was undertaken. Diagnostic outcomes from standardised assessments (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM), demographic (age, gender, family history, nationality) and socio-occupational (relationship status, living status, working status) variables were compiled for those not meeting criteria. These were compared with individuals diagnosed with an FEP in the same period.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From 2005 to 2021 inclusive, of 2025 index assessments, 27.6% (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This group is enriched for psychosis risk factors. They are a larger group than those meeting ARMS criteria, a finding that may reflect EIP service configuration. They may be an important focus for further study in the search for at-risk populations beyond the current ARMS model.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38179675
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.640
pii: S2056472423006403
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng