Complications and Unplanned Reoperation After Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Arthrodesis.

Hardware complications nonunion thumb MCP fusion thumb metacarpophalangeal arthrodesis unexpected reoperation

Journal

The Journal of hand surgery
ISSN: 1531-6564
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Am
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609631

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 06 03 2023
revised: 27 11 2023
accepted: 29 11 2023
medline: 5 1 2024
pubmed: 5 1 2024
entrez: 5 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the thumb is a common procedure to treat arthritis or instability. Studies reporting hardware complications and nonunion rates after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis report on small sample sizes. We aimed to describe the hardware complication rate, the nonunion rate, and the number of thumbs that achieve union among patients undergoing thumb MCP joint arthrodesis. A database spanning 5 urban hospitals in a single metropolitan region in the United States was searched for patients who underwent thumb MCP joint arthrodesis between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2020. After reviewing patient records, we identified 122 thumbs that underwent MCP joint arthrodesis and had a minimum follow-up of 90 days. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation after hardware complications and nonunion. Second, the number of thumbs that achieved radiographic union was reported for the tension band and screw fixation arthrodesis group. Twenty-two (18%) out of 122 thumbs had hardware complications after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis, and 11 (9%) out of 122 thumbs developed a nonunion. Patients who underwent screw fixation arthrodesis had no events of hardware complications and subsequent hardware removal. The nonunion rate was 9/65 (14%) in the tension band arthrodesis group and 2 (4%) of 45 in the screw fixation arthrodesis group. Of the thumbs that had available radiographs to assess the healing of the arthrodesis, 34 (81%) of 42 were radiographically united in the tension band arthrodesis group and 29 (91%) of 32 in the screw fixation group. Our data suggest that screw fixation has fewer hardware complications and a lower reoperation rate than tension band arthrodesis. Prognosis IV.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38180411
pii: S0363-5023(23)00643-3
doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.11.024
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ingmar W F Legerstee (IWF)

Hand and Arm Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Electronic address: i.legerstee@erasmusmc.nl.

Oscar Y Shen (OY)

Hand and Arm Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Kevin Kooi (K)

Hand and Arm Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Movement Sciences, Musculoskeletal Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Yannick A J Hoftiezer (YAJ)

Hand and Arm Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Kyle R Eberlin (KR)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Neal C Chen (NC)

Hand and Arm Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Classifications MeSH