Effect of Trabeculodescemetic Window Perforation in Deep Sclerectomy on Intraocular Pressure in Primary Congenital Glaucoma.
Intraocular pressure
Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy
Perforation
Primary congenital glaucoma
Trabeculodescemetic window
Journal
Ophthalmology and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8245
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101634502
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Jan 2024
05 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
15
10
2023
accepted:
01
12
2023
medline:
5
1
2024
pubmed:
5
1
2024
entrez:
5
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Primary congenital glaucoma causes vision loss if intraocular pressure is uncontrolled. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy is effective in treating primary congenital glaucoma. However, the effects of inadvertent trabeculodescemetic window perforation remain unclear. This retrospective cohort study included patients with primary congenital glaucoma who underwent nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy between 2014 and 2021. The perforation group had intraoperative trabeculodescemetic window perforations; the non-perforation group did not. The primary outcome was intraocular pressure between the groups over 15 months. The secondary outcomes included surgical success and complications. The study included 74 eyes of 44 patients. The cohort comprised 31 perforated and 43 non-perforated eyes. Both groups showed significant intraocular pressure reduction without significant between-group differences in complete (68 vs. 77%), qualified (19 vs. 9%), or failed (13 vs. 14%) treatments. The median intraocular pressure decreased from 39 to 14 mmHg in the perforation group and 35 to 12 mmHg in the non-perforation group. Of the 74 treated eyes, 68 (92%) showed no complications. An inadvertent trabeculodescemetic window perforation during nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy for primary congenital glaucoma did not significantly affect intraocular pressure outcomes compared to non-perforated cases over 15 months. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy reduced intraocular pressure regardless of intraoperative perforation in patients with primary congenital glaucoma. Perforation of the trabeculodescemetic window was associated with a low incidence of postoperative complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38180630
doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00869-9
pii: 10.1007/s40123-023-00869-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Badawi AH, Al-Muhaylib AA, Al Owaifeer AM, Al-Essa RS, Al-Shahwan SA. Primary congenital glaucoma: an updated review. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2019;33:382–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2019.10.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2019.10.002
pubmed: 31920449
pmcid: 6950954
Malik R, Khandekar R, Boodhna T, Rahbeeni Z, Al Towerki AE, Edward DP, et al. Eradicating primary congenital glaucoma from Saudi Arabia: the case for a national screening program. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2017;31:247–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2017.08.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2017.08.002
pubmed: 29234227
pmcid: 5717496
Badeeb OM, Micheal S, Koenekoop RK, den Hollander AI, Hedrawi MT. CYP1B1 mutations in patients with primary congenital glaucoma from Saudi Arabia. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12881-014-0109-2 .
doi: 10.1186/s12881-014-0109-2
pubmed: 25261878
pmcid: 4258803
Yazdani S, Miraftabi A, Pakravan M, Ghahari E, Tousi BK, Sedigh M, et al. Phenotype and genotype correlation in Iranian primary congenital glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma. 2016;25:33–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000206 .
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000206
pubmed: 25580891
Lee YJ, Ha A, Kang D, Shim SR, Jeoung JW, Park KH, et al. Comparative efficacies of 13 surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma in children: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Surg. 2023;109:953–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000283 .
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000283
pubmed: 36999777
pmcid: 10389407
Gagrani M, Garg I, Ghate D. Surgical interventions for primary congenital glaucoma. Cochrane eyes and vision group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008213.pub3 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008213.pub3
pubmed: 32816311
pmcid: 8094178
Stingl JV, Lagrèze WA, Hoffmann EM. Glaucoma in infancy and childhood Ophthalmologie. 2023;120:335–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-023-01828-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s00347-023-01828-2
pubmed: 36821055
Al-Hazmi A, Awad AH, Zwaan J, Al-Mesfer SA, Al-Jadaan I, Al-Mohammed A. Correlation between surgical success rate and severity of congenital glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:449–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2004.047761 .
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.047761
pubmed: 15774922
pmcid: 1772605
Mohammedsaleh A, Raffa LH, Almarzouki N, Jubran RM, Al-Harbi A, Alluqmani AH, et al. Surgical outcomes in children with primary congenital glaucoma: an eight-year experience. Cureus. 2020;12: e9602. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9602 .
doi: 10.7759/cureus.9602
pubmed: 32923206
pmcid: 7478473
Yassin SA, Al-Tamimi ER. Surgical outcomes in children with primary congenital glaucoma: a 20-year experience. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26:581–7. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000784 .
doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000784
pubmed: 27033964
Yazdani S, Pakravan M, Gerami E, Doozandeh A, Esfandiari H, Sharifipour F. Trabeculotomy versus combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy for management of primary congenital glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2022;31:346–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001981 .
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001981
pubmed: 34999664
Al-Obeidan SA, Osman EEA, Dewedar AS, Kestelyn P, Mousa A. Efficacy and safety of deep sclerectomy in childhood glaucoma in Saudi Arabia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:65–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02558.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02558.x
pubmed: 23241279
Bhartiya S, Ichhpujani P, Shaarawy T. Surgery on the trabecular meshwork: histopathological evidence. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2015;9:51–61. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1184 .
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1184
pubmed: 26997835
pmcid: 4750027
Roy S, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2017;59:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1159/000458484 .
doi: 10.1159/000458484
pubmed: 28442685
Morales J, Al Shahwan S, Al Odhayb S, Al Jadaan I, Edward DP. Current surgical options for the management of pediatric glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013: 763735. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/763735 .
doi: 10.1155/2013/763735
pubmed: 23738051
pmcid: 3655566
Khan OA, Sesma G, Alawi A, AlWazae M. Outcomes of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy for primary congenital glaucoma performed by experienced versus trainee surgeons: a cohort study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:897–906. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S403016 .
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S403016
pubmed: 36960324
pmcid: 10028302
Rękas M, Rudowicz J, Lewczuk K, Kluś A, Pawlik B, Stankiewicz A. Phacoemulsification–deep sclerectomy modified by trabeculum microperforations and implantation of lens anterior capsule as autologous scleral implant. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:2025–32. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2010.500857 .
doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.500857
pubmed: 20590394
Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Lüke C, Krieglstein GK. Morphological variability of the trabecular meshwork in glaucoma patients: implications for non-perforating glaucoma surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1354–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.12.1354 .
doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.12.1354
pubmed: 11090472
pmcid: 1723341
Lachkar Y, Neverauskiene J, Jeanteur-Lunel MN, Gracies H, Berkani M, Ecoffet M, et al. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy: a 6-year retrospective study. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210401400105 .
doi: 10.1177/112067210401400105
pubmed: 15005582
Kozobolis V, Kalogianni E, Sideroudi H. Penetrating deep sclerectomy in primary open-angle and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020;30:264–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672119827768 .
doi: 10.1177/1120672119827768
pubmed: 30773043
Shaarawy T, Nguyen C, Schnyder C, Mermoud A. Comparative study between deep sclerectomy with and without collagen implant: long-term follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:95–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.88.1.95 .
doi: 10.1136/bjo.88.1.95
pubmed: 14693783
pmcid: 1771937
Suominen S, Harju M, Ihanamäki T, Vesti E. The effect of deep sclerectomy on intraocular pressure of normal-tension glaucoma patients: 1-year results. Acta Ophthalmol. 2010;88:27–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01623.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01623.x
pubmed: 19775310
Papadopoulos M, Edmunds B, Fenerty C, Khaw PT. Childhood glaucoma surgery in the 21st Century. Eye (Lond). 2014;28:931–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.140 .
doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.140
pubmed: 24924446
Ambresin A, Shaarawy T, Mermoud A. Deep sclerectomy with collagen implant in one eye compared with trabeculectomy in the other eye of the same patient. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:214–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200206000-00009 .
doi: 10.1097/00061198-200206000-00009
pubmed: 12140398
Cheng JW, Xi GL, Wei RL, Cai JP, Li Y. Efficacy and tolerability of nonpenetrating filtering surgery in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224:138–46. https://doi.org/10.1159/000236039 .
doi: 10.1159/000236039
pubmed: 19738394
Lüke C, Dietlein TS, Jacobi PC, Konen W, Krieglstein GK. Risk profile of deep sclerectomy for treatment of refractory congenital glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1066–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01077-1 .
doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01077-1
pubmed: 12045045
Kalala A, Gillmann K, Mermoud A. Prospective evaluation of penetrating deep sclerectomy in advanced open-angle glaucoma: filtration surgery adapted to resource scarcity in developing countries. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020;43:228–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2019.07.024 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.07.024
pubmed: 31987680
Sanchez E, Schnyder C, Mermoud A. Résultats comparatifs de la sclérectomie profonde transformée en trabéculectomie et de la trabéculectomie classique. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1997;210:261–4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1035050 .
doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035050
pubmed: 9324530
Karaconji T, Mercieca K, Romera P, McNaught A, Anand N. A comparison of deep sclerectomy trainer versus trainee outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2019;28:427–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001195 .
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001195
pubmed: 30676412
Rulli E, Biagioli E, Riva I, Gambirasio G, De Simone I, Floriani I, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:1573–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059 .
doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059
pubmed: 24158640
Sangtam T, Roy S, Mermoud A. Outcome and complications of combined modified deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy for surgical management of glaucoma: a pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:795–803. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S244945 .
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S244945
pubmed: 32210532
pmcid: 7075434
AlDarrab A, Malik R. Bilateral deep sclerectomy with microperforations as a successful secondary procedure in aniridia-associated glaucoma. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2018;25:52–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_17 .
doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_17
pubmed: 29899653
pmcid: 5974820
Elhofi A, Helaly HA. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in primary congenital glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:1277–85. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S253689 .
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S253689
pubmed: 32494118
pmcid: 7229790
El Sayyad F, Helal M, El-Kholify H, Khalil M, El-Maghraby A. Nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy versus trabeculectomy in bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1671–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00263-3 .
doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00263-3
pubmed: 10964827
Correia Barbosa R, Gonçalves R, Bastos R, Alves Pereira S, Basto R, Viana AR, et al. Trabeculectomy vs non-penetrating deep sclerectomy for the surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a long-term report of 201 eyes. OPTH Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1619–27. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S405837 .
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S405837
Yan X, Zhang H, Li F, Ma L, Geng Y, Tang G. Surgical site characteristics after CLASS followed by ultrasound biomicroscopy and clinical grading scale: a 2-year follow-up. Eye (Lond). 2021;35:2283–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01235-w .
doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01235-w
pubmed: 33139873