Cerebrospinal fluid lysophosphatidylcholine species for distinguishing narrowing of the lumbar spine.

diagnostic accuracy lumbar spinal canal stenosis lysophosphatidylcholine persistent spinal pain syndrome

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 25 12 2023
revised: 28 12 2023
accepted: 29 12 2023
medline: 6 1 2024
pubmed: 6 1 2024
entrez: 5 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Reoperation, sometimes multiple, is common with progressively worse outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), a precursor of lysophosphatidic acid, in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a possible biomarker for neuropathic pain and discriminating neuropathic pain caused by lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) from other etiologies. This study aimed to explore this possible use of LPC species in the CSF. Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, we measured six LPC species, (16:0), (18:0), (18:1), (18:2), (20:4), and (22:6), in the CSF. [Multi-site observational study] PARTICIPANTS: Patients with LSCS (n=137) and persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS, n=22). CSF collection using lumbar puncture. We compared the LPC values between the groups and determined the cutoff levels that could efficiently discriminate the groups with high accuracy. The levels of all measured LPC species were significantly higher in the LSCS group than the PSPS group. Four LPC species demonstrated more than 0.80 area under the curve obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Although the specificity of cutoff levels for the six LPC species was low to moderate, their sensitivity was consistently high. The existing diagnostic protocols combining physical examinations and morphological imaging studies for lumbar spinal pain have limited sensitivity. Measuring LPC species in the CSF is a promising objective laboratory test and could be suitable for detecting the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis and can help indications for surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38181872
pii: S1878-8750(23)01881-8
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.148
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Masahiko Sumitani (M)

Department of Pain and Palliative Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: SUMITANIM-ANE@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.

Atsushi Kimura (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.

Takao Mochizuki (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Toru Akiyama (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan.

Baasanjav Uranbileg (B)

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takuya Takahashi (T)

Department of Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Takashi Hirai (T)

Department of Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Kentaro Hayakawa (K)

Department of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.

Hirotaka Chikuda (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gunma University, Gunma, Japan.

Makoto Kurano (M)

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH