Treatment in certified cancer centers is related to better survival in patients with colon and rectal cancer: evidence from a large German cohort study.
Certified cancer center
Cohort study
Colon cancer
Cox regression
Quality of cancer care
Rectal cancer
Survival
Journal
World journal of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1477-7819
Titre abrégé: World J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170544
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2024
06 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
28
10
2022
accepted:
22
11
2023
medline:
6
1
2024
pubmed:
6
1
2024
entrez:
5
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Certified cancer centers aim to ensure high-quality care by establishing structural and procedural standards according to evidence-based guidelines. Despite the high clinical and health policy relevance, evidence from a nation-wide study for the effectiveness of care for colorectal cancer in certified centers vs. other hospitals in Germany is still missing. In a retrospective cohort study covering the years 2009-2017, we analyzed patient data using demographic information, diagnoses, and treatments from a nationwide statutory health insurance enriched with information on certification. We investigated whether patients with incident colon or rectal cancer did benefit from primary therapy in a certified cancer center. We used relative survival analysis taking into account mortality data of the German population and adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics via Cox regression with shared frailty for patients in hospitals with and without certification. The cohorts for colon and rectal cancer consisted of 109,518 and 51,417 patients, respectively, treated in a total of 1052 hospitals. 37.2% of patients with colon and 42.9% of patients with rectal cancer were treated in a certified center. Patient age, sex, comorbidities, secondary malignoma, and distant metastases were similar across groups (certified/non-certified) for both colon and rectal cancer. Relative survival analysis showed significantly better survival of patients treated in a certified center, with 68.3% (non-certified hospitals 65.8%) 5-year survival for treatment of colon cancer in certified (p < 0.001) and 65.0% (58.8%) 5-year survival in case of rectal cancer (p < 0.001), respectively. Cox regression with adjustment for relevant covariates yielded a lower hazard of death for patients treated in certified centers for both colon (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.95) and rectal cancer (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88-0.95). The results remained robust in a series of sensitivity analyses. This large cohort study yields new important evidence that patients with colorectal cancer have a better chance of survival if treated in a certified cancer center. Certification thus provides one powerful means to improve the quality of care for colorectal cancer. To decrease the burden of disease, more patients should thus receive cancer care in a certified center.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Certified cancer centers aim to ensure high-quality care by establishing structural and procedural standards according to evidence-based guidelines. Despite the high clinical and health policy relevance, evidence from a nation-wide study for the effectiveness of care for colorectal cancer in certified centers vs. other hospitals in Germany is still missing.
METHODS
METHODS
In a retrospective cohort study covering the years 2009-2017, we analyzed patient data using demographic information, diagnoses, and treatments from a nationwide statutory health insurance enriched with information on certification. We investigated whether patients with incident colon or rectal cancer did benefit from primary therapy in a certified cancer center. We used relative survival analysis taking into account mortality data of the German population and adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics via Cox regression with shared frailty for patients in hospitals with and without certification.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The cohorts for colon and rectal cancer consisted of 109,518 and 51,417 patients, respectively, treated in a total of 1052 hospitals. 37.2% of patients with colon and 42.9% of patients with rectal cancer were treated in a certified center. Patient age, sex, comorbidities, secondary malignoma, and distant metastases were similar across groups (certified/non-certified) for both colon and rectal cancer. Relative survival analysis showed significantly better survival of patients treated in a certified center, with 68.3% (non-certified hospitals 65.8%) 5-year survival for treatment of colon cancer in certified (p < 0.001) and 65.0% (58.8%) 5-year survival in case of rectal cancer (p < 0.001), respectively. Cox regression with adjustment for relevant covariates yielded a lower hazard of death for patients treated in certified centers for both colon (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89-0.95) and rectal cancer (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.88-0.95). The results remained robust in a series of sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This large cohort study yields new important evidence that patients with colorectal cancer have a better chance of survival if treated in a certified cancer center. Certification thus provides one powerful means to improve the quality of care for colorectal cancer. To decrease the burden of disease, more patients should thus receive cancer care in a certified center.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38183134
doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03262-9
pii: 10.1186/s12957-023-03262-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11Subventions
Organisme : Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17020
Organisme : Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17020
Organisme : Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17020
Organisme : Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17020
Organisme : Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17020
Organisme : Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss
ID : 01VSF17020
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
World Cancer Report: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention. World Cancer Reports, Edited by Wild CP, Weiderpass E, Stewart BW
Krebs in Deutschland 2015/16, https://doi.org/10.25646/5977.2
Colorectal Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:145–64.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21601
S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, AWMF-Register-Nummer (021–007OL)
Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020–2022, ACS (American Cancer Society)
Tarantino et al: Prognostic relevance of palliative primary tumor removal in 37,793 metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a population-based, propensity score-adjusted trend analysis. 2015; 262(1):112–20.
Nationaler Krebsplan (Stand 2017), https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/5_Publikationen/Praevention/Broschueren/Broschuere_Nationaler_Krebsplan.pdf
Birkmeyer NJ, Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Hillner BE, Birkmeyer JD. Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer. 2005;103:435–41.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.20785
pubmed: 15622523
https://ecc-cert.org/certification-system/document-collection/
Mehta R, Ejaz A, Hyer JM, Tsilimigras DI, White S, Merath K, et al. The impact of Dedicated Cancer Centers on outcomes among medicare beneficiaries undergoing liver and pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:4083–90.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07677-1
pubmed: 31376033
Völkel V, Draeger T, Gerken M, Fürst A, Klinkhammer-Schalke M. Langzeitüberleben von Patienten mit Kolon- und Rektumkarzinomen: Ein Vergleich von Darmkrebszentren und nicht zertifizierten Krankenhäusern - [Long-Term Survival of Patients with Colon and Rectum Carcinomas: Is There a Difference Between Cancer Centers and Non-Certified Hospitals?]. Gesundheitswesen. 2018;81(10):801.
pubmed: 29672814
Trautmann F, Reißfelder C, Pecqueux M, Weitz J, Schmitt J. Evidence-based quality standards improve prognosis in colon cancer care. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1324–30.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.013
pubmed: 29885983
Reeves ME. Do better operative reports equal better surgery? A comparative evaluation of compliance with operative standards for cancer surgery. Am Surg. 2020;86(10):1281–8.
doi: 10.1177/0003134820964225
pubmed: 33124892
Butea-Bocu MC, Müller G, Pucheril D, Kroeger E, Otto U. Is there a clinical benefit from prostate cancer center certification? An evaluation of functional and oncologic outcomes from 22,649 radical prostatectomy patients. World J Urol. 2021;39:5–10.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03411-9
pubmed: 32851440
Paulson EC, Mitra N, Sonnad S, Armstrong K, Wirtalla C, Kelz RR, Mahmoud NN. National Cancer Institute designation predicts improved outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318187a757
Kowalski C, Graeven U, von Kalle C, Lang H, Beckmann MW, Blohmer J-U, et al. Shifting cancer care towards multidisciplinarity: the cancer center certification program of the German Cancer Society. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:1–9.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3824-1
Griesshammer E, Wesselmann S. European cancer centre certification programme gynäkologe. 2019;52:380–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-019-4398-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00129-019-4398-6
https://www.krebsgesellschaft.de/zertdokumente.html , in German.
Roessler M, Schmitt J, Bobeth C, Gerken M, Kleihues-van Tol K, Reissfelder C, Rau BM, Distler M, Piso P, Günster C, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Schoffer O, Bierbaum V. Is treatment in certified cancer centers related to better survival in patients with pancreatic cancer? Evidence from a large German cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):621.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09731-w
pubmed: 35672675
pmcid: 9172168
Vogel PA. Why certification of colorectal cancer centres does not improve surgical quality. Zentralbl Chir. 2019;144(3):273–80.
pubmed: 29986354
Jacob A, Albert W, Jackisch T, Jakob C, Sims A, Witzigmann H, Mees ST, Stelzner S. Association of certification, improved quality and better oncological outcomes for rectal cancer in a specialized colorectal unit. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021;36(3):517–33.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03792-8
pubmed: 33165684
Schrodi S, Tillack A, Niedostatek A, Werner C, Schubert-Fritschle G, Engel J. No survival benefit for patients with treatment in certified breast centers-a population-based evaluation of german cancer registry data. Breast J. 2015;21:490–500.
doi: 10.1111/tbj.12444
pubmed: 26130502
Heil J, Gondos A, Rauch G, Marmé F, Rom J, Golatta M, Junkermann H, Sinn P, Aulmann S, Debus J, Hof H, Schütz F, Brenner H, Sohn C, Schneeweiss A. Outcome analysis of patients with primary breast cancer initially treated at a certified academic breast unit. Breast. 2012;21(3):303–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.009
pubmed: 22310244
Beckmann MW, Brucker C, Hanf V, Rauh C, Bani MR, Knob S, et al. Quality assured health care in certified breast centers and improvement of the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Onkologie. 2011;34:362–7.
doi: 10.1159/000329601
pubmed: 21734422
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61(4):344–9.
Swart E, Schmitt J. STandardized Reporting Of Secondary data Analyses (STROSA) - Vorschlag für ein Berichtsformat für Sekundärdatenanalysen. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108:511–6.
Swart E., Gothe H., Geyer S., Jaunzeme J., Maier B., Grobe T. G., Ihle P., Gute Praxis Sekundärdatenanalyse (GPS): Leitlinien und Empfehlungen/Good Practice of Secondary Data Analysis (GPS): Guidelines and Recommendations. Gesundheitswesen 2015; 77(02): 120 – 126
Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998; 36:8-27.
Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43(11)
Schoffer O, Niedostatek A, Klug SJ. Estimation of Relative Survival Based on Cancer Registry Data. Review of Bioinformatics and Biometrics 2013; 2(4):77-82.
href="https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Sterbefaelle-Lebenserwartung/Tabellen/_tabellen-innen-lebenserwartung-sterbetafel.html">https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bevoelkerung/Sterbefaelle-Lebenserwartung/Tabellen/_tabellen-innen-lebenserwartung-sterbetafel.html
Pohar M., Stare J. Relative survival analysis in R. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006; 81(3):272-8.
Hakulinen T and Dyba, T. Cancer Survival. International Encyclopedia of Public Health, Academic Press, 2008.
Wienke, A. Frailty models in survival analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherland: CRC Press,2010.
Balan TA, Putter H. A tutorial on frailty models. Stat. Methods Med Res. 2020; 29(11):3424-3454.
https://innovationsfonds.g-ba.de/downloads/beschluss-dokumente/268/2022-10-17_WiZen_Ergebnisbericht.pdf, in German.
href="https://www.wido.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Dokumente/Publikationen_Produkte/GGW/2022/wido_ggw_0422_schoffer_et_al.pdf">https://www.wido.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Dokumente/Publikationen_Produkte/GGW/2022/wido_ggw_0422_schoffer_et_al.pdf, in German.
Völkel, V.; Gerken, M.; Kleihues-van Tol, K.; Schoffer, O.; Bierbaum, V.; Bobeth, C.; Roessler, M.; Reissfelder, C.; Fürst, A.; Benz, S.; et al. Treatment of Colorectal Cancer in Certified Centers: Results of a Large German Registry Study Focusing on Long-Term Survival. Cancers 2023, 15, 4568
Burke L.G., Frakt A.B., Khullar D., Orav E.J., Jha A.K. Association Between Teaching Status and Mortality in US Hospitals. JAMA. 2017;317(20):2105–2113.
Boffa D.J., Mallin K., Herrin J., et al. Survival After Cancer Treatment at Top-Ranked US Cancer Hospitals vs Affiliates of Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e203942.
Callaway C.W., Schmicker R., Kampmeyer M., Powell J., Rea T.D., Daya M.R., Aufderheide T.P., Davis D.P., Rittenberger J.C., Idris A.H., Nichol G; Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Investigators. Receiving hospital characteristics associated with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010;81(5):524-9
Pross C., Berger E., Siegel M., Geissler A., Busse R. Stroke units, certification, and outcomes in German hospitals: a longitudinal study of patient-based 30-day mortality for 2006-2014. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):880.
Fuchs, A., Käser, D., Theiler, L. et al. Survival and long-term outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest in a Swiss university hospital: a prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 29, 115 (2021)
Stub D, Smith K, Bray JE, Bernard S, Duffy SJ, Kaye DM. Hospital characteristics are associated with patient outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart. 2011;97(18):1489–94.
doi: 10.1136/hrt.2011.226431
pubmed: 21693477
Barbas AS, Turley RS, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Effect of surgeon specialization on long-term survival following colon cancer resection at an NCI-designated cancer center. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106(3):219–23.
doi: 10.1002/jso.22154
pubmed: 22105839
Paulson EC, Mitra N, Sonnad S, Armstrong K, Wirtalla C, Kelz RR, Mahmoud NN. National Cancer Institute designation predicts improved outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):675–86.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318187a757
pubmed: 18936581
Nimptsch U, Mansky T. Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e016184.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016184
pubmed: 28882913
pmcid: 5589035
Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jørgensen P. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01100.x.
Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jørgensen P; Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 2: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2007; 9(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01095.x.
Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, Humblet Y, Bouché O, Mineur L, Barone C, Adenis A, Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Lenz HJ, Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Cihon F, Cupit L, Wagner A, Laurent D; CORRECT Study Group. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303-12.
Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, Yoshino T, Garcia-Carbonero R, Mizunuma N, Yamazaki K, Shimada Y, Tabernero J, Komatsu Y, Sobrero A, Boucher E, Peeters M, Tran B, Lenz HJ, Zaniboni A, Hochster H, Cleary JM, Prenen H, Benedetti F, Mizuguchi H, Makris L, Ito M, Ohtsu A; RECOURSE Study Group. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(20).
Cheng, C.Y., Datzmann, T., Hernandez, D., Schmitt, J., Schlander, M. Do certified cancer centers provide more cost-effective care? A health economic analysis of colon cancer care in Germany using administrative data. Int J Cancer, 2021; 149(10): 1744-1754.
E. Swart, C. Stallmann, M. Schimmelpfennig, A. Feißel, S. March: Gutachten zum Einsatz von Sekundärdaten für die Forschung zu Arbeit und Gesundheit. 1. Auflage. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin 2018.
D. P. MacKinnon, A. J. Fairchild, and M. S. Fritz. Mediation Analysis. Ann Rev Psychol. 2007;58 1:593-614
Bauer, J., Klingelhöfer, D., Maier, W. et al. Spatial accessibility of general inpatient care in Germany: an analysis of surgery, internal medicine and neurology. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19157.
Comber H, Sharp L, Timmons A, Keane FBV. Quality of rectal cancer surgery and its relationship to surgeon and hospital caseload: a population-based study. Colorectal Dis. 2012; 14(10):e692-700
Morche et al. Relationship between surgeon volume and outcomes: a systematic review of systematic reviews Systematic Reviews (2016) 5:204
Chioreso C, Del Vecchio N, Schweizer ML, Schlichting J, Gribovskaja-Rupp I, Charlton ME. Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Volume and Rectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated Since 2000: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61(11):1320-1332.
Nimptsch U., Mansky T. Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e016184
Kuchenbecker J., Peters F., Kreutzburg T., Marschall U., L'Hoest H., Behrendt C.A. The Relationship Between Hospital Procedure Volume and Outcomes After Endovascular or Open Surgical Revascularisation for Peripheral Arterial Disease: An Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023; 65(3):370-378.
Hernán MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183(8):758–64.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv254
pubmed: 26994063
pmcid: 4832051
Hernán MA, Wang W, Leaf DE. Target trial emulation: a framework for causal inference from observational data. JAMA. 2022;328(24):2446–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.21383 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21383
pubmed: 36508210
Edwards GC, Martin RL, Samuels LR, Wyman K, Bailey CE, Kiernan CM, Snyder RA, Dittus RS, Roumie CL. Association of adherence to quality metrics with recurrence or mortality among veterans with colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25(8):2055–64.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04804-2
pubmed: 33169321
Standeven L, Price Hiller J, Mulder K, Zhu G, Ghosh S, Spratlin JL. Impact of a dedicated cancer center surveillance program on guideline adherence for patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2013;12(2):103–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2012.09.006
pubmed: 23153862
Xu Z, Mohile SG, Tejani MA, Becerra AZ, Probst CP, Aquina CT, Hensley BJ, Arsalanizadeh R, Noyes K, Monson JR, Fleming FJ. Poor compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy use associated with poorer survival in patients with rectal cancer: An NCDB analysis. Cancer. 2017;123(1):52–61.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.30261
pubmed: 27560162