Birth asphyxia and its association with grand multiparity and referral among hospital births: A prospective cross-sectional study in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda.
high-risk
low-income country
obstetrics
pregnancy
pregnancy birth
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2024
06 Jan 2024
Historique:
revised:
26
11
2023
received:
31
08
2023
accepted:
02
12
2023
medline:
7
1
2024
pubmed:
7
1
2024
entrez:
6
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Birth asphyxia is a leading cause of neonatal mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. The relationship to grand multiparity (GM), a controversial pregnancy risk factor, remains largely unexplored, especially in the context of large multinational studies. We investigated birth asphyxia and its association with GM and referral in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Data were collected using a perinatal e-Registry in 16 hospitals (four per country). The study population consisted of 80 663 babies (>1000 g, >28 weeks' gestational age) delivered between July 2021 and December 2022. The primary outcome was birth asphyxia, defined by 5-minute appearance, pulse, grimace, activity and respiration score <7. A multilevel and stratified multivariate logistic regression was performed with GM (parity ≥5) as exposure, and birth asphyxia as outcome. An interaction between referral (none, prepartum, intrapartum) and GM was also evaluated as a secondary outcome. All models were adjusted for confounders. Pan African Clinical Trial Registry 202006793783148. Birth asphyxia was present in 7.0% (n = 5612) of babies. More babies with birth asphyxia were born to grand multiparous women (11.9%) than to other parity groups (≤7.6%). Among the 76 850 cases included in the analysis, grand multiparous women had a 1.34 times higher odds of birth asphyxia (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.54) vs para one to two. Grand multiparous women referred intrapartum had the highest probability of asphyxiation (13.02%, 95% CI 9.34-16.69). GM increased odds of birth asphyxia in Benin (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.68) and Uganda (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02-1.64), but was non-significant in Tanzania (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.81-2.56) and Malawi (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.67-1.44). There is some evidence of an increased risk of birth asphyxia for grand multiparous women having babies at hospitals, especially following intrapartum referral. Antenatal counseling should recognize grand multiparity as higher risk and advise appropriate childbirth facilities. Findings in Malawi suggest an advantage of health systems configuration requiring further exploration.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : European Commission
ID : Horizon 2020 (No 847824)
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Child Mortality and Stillbirth Estimates [Internet]. ChildMortality.org. https://childmortality.org/
World Health Organization. Guidelines on Basic Newborn Resuscitation [Internet]. 2012. Geneva: World Health Organization. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/75157
Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:467-471.
Igboanugo S, Chen A, Mielke JG. Maternal risk factors for birth asphyxia in low-resource communities. A systematic review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;40:1039-1055.
Ahmed R, Mosa H, Sultan M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with birth asphyxia among neonates delivered in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2021;16:e0255488.
Desalew A, Semahgn A, Tesfaye G. Determinants of birth asphyxia among newborns in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Health Sci. 2020;14:35-47.
Njoku CO, Abeshi SE, Emechebe CI. Grand multiparity: obstetric outcome in comparison with multiparous women in a developing country. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;7:707-718.
Geidam AD, Audu BM, Oummate Z. Pregnancy outcome among grand multiparous women at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital: a case control study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31:404-408.
Agrawal S, Agarwal A, Das V. Impact of grandmultiparity on obstetric outcome in low resource setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2011;37:1015-1019.
Alsammani MA, Jafer AM, Khieri SA, Ali AO, Shaaeldin MA. Effect of grand multiparity on pregnancy outcomes in women under 35 years of age: a comparative study. Med Arch. 2019;73:92-96.
Toohey JS, Keegan KA, Morgan MA, et al. The “dangerous multipara”: fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:683-686.
Mgaya AH, Massawe SN, Kidanto HL, Mgaya HN. Grand multiparity: is it still a risk in pregnancy? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:241.
Solomons B. The dangerous multipara. Lancet. 1934;224:8-11.
Campbell OMR, Calvert C, Testa A, et al. The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. Lancet. 2016;388:2193-2208.
Pembe AB, Urassa DP, Darj E, Carlstedt A, Olsson P. Qualitative study on maternal referrals in rural Tanzania: decision making and acceptance of referral advice. Afr J Reprod Health Rev Afr Santé Reprod. 2008;12:120-131.
Straneo M, Beňová L, van den Akker T, Pembe AB, Smekens T, Hanson C. No increase in use of hospitals for childbirth in Tanzania over 25 years: accumulation of inequity among poor, rural, high parity women. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;2:e0000345.
Tukur J, Lavin T, Adanikin A, et al. Quality and outcomes of maternal and perinatal care for 76,563 pregnancies reported in a nationwide network of Nigerian referral-level hospitals. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;47:101411.
Ajong AB, Agbor VN, Simo LP, Noubiap JJ, Njim T. Grand multiparity in rural Cameroon: prevalence and adverse maternal and fetal delivery outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:233.
Akuze J, Annerstedt KS, Benova L, et al. Action leveraging evidence to reduce perinatal mortality and morbidity (ALERT): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial in Benin, Malawi, Tanzania and Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21:1324.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 644: The Apgar score. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(126):e52-e55.
World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, Fifth Edition. 2015. World Health Organization.
Londero AP, Rossetti E, Pittini C, Cagnacci A, Driul L. Maternal age and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:261.
World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for a Positive Pregnancy Experience [Internet]. 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; Accessed May 3, 2023. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250796
Laerd Statistics Group. Spearman's Correlation in Stata - Procedure, Output and Interpretation of the Output Using a relevant Example [Internet]. Laerd Statistics. Accessed March 9, 2023] https://statistics.laerd.com/stata-tutorials/spearmans-correlation-using-stata.php#procedure
Chan BCP, Lao TTH. Effect of parity and advanced maternal age on obstetric outcome. Int J Gynaecol Obstet off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:237-241.
Simonsen SME, Lyon JL, Alder SC, Varner MW. Effect of grand multiparity on intrapartum and newborn complications in young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106:454-460.
PACTR. PACTR: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry [Internet]. PACTR. Accessed August 31, 2023] https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/
Muniro Z, Tarimo CS, Mahande MJ, Maro E, Mchome B. Grand multiparity as a predictor of adverse pregnancy outcome among women who delivered at a tertiary hospital in northern Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:222.
Dasa TT, Okunlola MA, Dessie Y. Effect of grand multiparity on adverse maternal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:959633.
Holdcroft A, Snidvongs S, Cason A, Doré CJ, Berkley KJ. Pain and uterine contractions during breast feeding in the immediate post-partum period increase with parity. Pain. 2003;104:589-596.
Leathersich SJ, Vogel JP, Tran TS, Hofmeyr GJ. Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018:CD009770.
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. Reproductive and Child Health Card Number 4 (RCHC-4). Dar es Salaam, the United Republic of Tanzania: Ministry of Health and Social Welfare 2006.
Ministry of Health. Essential Maternal and Newborn Clinical Care Guidelines for Uganda. R.A.C.H. Department; 2022.
Low JA, Pickersgill H, Killen H, Derrick EJ. The prediction and prevention of intrapartum fetal asphyxia in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:724-730.
Jahn A, Kowalewski M, Kimatta SS. Obstetric care in southern Tanzania: does it reach those in need? Trop Med Int Health. 1998;3:926-932.
Hanson C, Munjanja S, Binagwaho A, et al. National policies and care provision in pregnancy and childbirth for twins in eastern and southern Africa: a mixed-methods multi-country study. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002749.
Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1091-1110.
World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory: Data Repository [Internet]. World Health Organization https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main
UNICEF. UNICEF Data: Monitoring the situation of Children and Women [Internet]. UNICEF: for every child. Accessed December 13, 2022. https://data.unicef.org/resources/resource-type/datasets/
Bai J, Wong FWS, Bauman A, Mohsin M. Parity and pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:274-278.
Gabrysch S, Campbell OM. Still too far to walk: literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:34.
World Health Organization. WHO Multimedia [Internet]. World Health Organization. Accessed August 31, 2023. https://www.who.int/multi-media