Treatment Difficulties in Wheat Oral Immunotherapy and the Predictive Value of Wheat-Specific IgE.


Journal

Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology
ISSN: 0125-877X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 8402034

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 7 1 2024
pubmed: 7 1 2024
entrez: 6 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Factors associated with wheat oral immunotherapy (OIT) difficulties in patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy have not been well studied. We aimed to assess factors associated with difficulties in wheat OIT. We retrospectively collected data from children under 18 years of age with history of IgE-mediated wheat allergy who underwent wheat OIT. The initial specific IgE (sIgE) of wheat and omega-5-gliadin, wheat skin prick test (SPT) sizes, eliciting doses, and adverse reactions during the OIT were evaluated. A total of 81 children were enrolled, with a mean age of 7.0 ± 2.7 years at the initiation of wheat OIT. The median follow-up duration was 2 years (IQR 1.2 -3.0 years). Difficulties in wheat OIT included patients who experienced frequent reactions (at least grade 2 or exercise-induced reactions) or deviated from the up-dosing protocol, which we defined as 'Complicated cases.' Twenty-six patients (32.1%) were complicated cases. Initial wheat-sIgEs were significantly higher in complicated cases than in noncomplicated cases (median of 192.3 kUA/L (IQR 30.4-590.0) vs 6.9 kUA/L (IQR 1.9-100.0) (p = 0.001)). Initial omega-5-gliadin-sIgEs in the complicated group were also significantly higher, with a median of 15.0 kUA/L (IQR 6.3-69.8) vs 1.6 kUA/L (IQR 0.2-11.4) (p < 0.001). The risk factors for complicated cases include higher omega-5-gliadin-sIgEs and anaphylaxis during the oral food challenge test (aOR 1.035 and 5.684, respectively). The initial wheat and omega-5-gliadin-sIgEs were significant risk factors for complicated OIT patients and could be used to monitor these patients carefully during the OIT period.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Factors associated with wheat oral immunotherapy (OIT) difficulties in patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy have not been well studied.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to assess factors associated with difficulties in wheat OIT.
METHODS METHODS
We retrospectively collected data from children under 18 years of age with history of IgE-mediated wheat allergy who underwent wheat OIT. The initial specific IgE (sIgE) of wheat and omega-5-gliadin, wheat skin prick test (SPT) sizes, eliciting doses, and adverse reactions during the OIT were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 81 children were enrolled, with a mean age of 7.0 ± 2.7 years at the initiation of wheat OIT. The median follow-up duration was 2 years (IQR 1.2 -3.0 years). Difficulties in wheat OIT included patients who experienced frequent reactions (at least grade 2 or exercise-induced reactions) or deviated from the up-dosing protocol, which we defined as 'Complicated cases.' Twenty-six patients (32.1%) were complicated cases. Initial wheat-sIgEs were significantly higher in complicated cases than in noncomplicated cases (median of 192.3 kUA/L (IQR 30.4-590.0) vs 6.9 kUA/L (IQR 1.9-100.0) (p = 0.001)). Initial omega-5-gliadin-sIgEs in the complicated group were also significantly higher, with a median of 15.0 kUA/L (IQR 6.3-69.8) vs 1.6 kUA/L (IQR 0.2-11.4) (p < 0.001). The risk factors for complicated cases include higher omega-5-gliadin-sIgEs and anaphylaxis during the oral food challenge test (aOR 1.035 and 5.684, respectively).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The initial wheat and omega-5-gliadin-sIgEs were significant risk factors for complicated OIT patients and could be used to monitor these patients carefully during the OIT period.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38183640
doi: 10.12932/AP-010923-1682
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Punchama Pacharn (P)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Siriluck Witeetanavanich (S)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Witchaya Srisuwatchari (W)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nuntanut Rutrakool (N)

Samitivej Allergy Institute, Samitivej Thonburi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Chulamanee Wongteerayanee (C)

Samitivej Allergy Institute, Samitivej Thonburi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Pattara Tanticharoenwiwat (P)

Samitivej Allergy Institute, Samitivej Thonburi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Anchalee Senavonge (A)

Samitivej Allergy Institute, Samitivej Thonburi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Kantima Kanchanapoomi (K)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Orathai Jirapongsananuruk (O)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nualanong Visitsunthorn (N)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Pakit Vichyanond (P)

Samitivej Allergy Institute, Samitivej Thonburi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Classifications MeSH