Metaphysical indeterminacy in Everettian quantum mechanics.

The question of whether Everettian quantum mechanics (EQM) justifies the existence of metaphysical indeterminacy has recently come to the fore. Metaphysical indeterminacy has been argued to emerge from three sources: coherent superpositions, the indefinite number of branches in the quantum multiverse and the nature of these branches. This paper reviews the evidence and concludes that those arguments don't rely on EQM alone and rest on metaphysical auxiliary assumptions that transcend the physics of EQM. We show how EQM can be ontologically interpreted without positing metaphysical indeterminacy by adopting a deflationary attitude towards branches. Two ways of developing the deflationary view are then proposed: one where branches are eliminated, and another where they are reduced to the universal quantum state.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing InterestsThis work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation via Le Bihan’s Starting grant Space, Time and Causation in Quantum Gravity (grant 211317). The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.