A Retrospective Study Comparing the Effect of Conventional Coagulation Parameters Vs. Thromboelastography-Guided Blood Product Utilization in Patients With Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Blood products Coagulation Gastrointestinal bleeding Thromboelastography

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine research
ISSN: 1918-3003
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101538301

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 06 09 2023
accepted: 28 10 2023
medline: 8 1 2024
pubmed: 8 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The use of thromboelastography (TEG) has demonstrated decreased blood product utilization in patients with specific etiologies of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), such as variceal and non-variceal bleeding in cirrhosis patients; however, in a non-cirrhosis patient with GIB, there is far less evidence in the literature. Our retrospective study compares the effect of TEG-guided blood product utilization in patients with major GIB with all etiologies, including cirrhosis, admitted to medical intensive care unit (MICU). A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients admitted to the MICU of a tertiary academic medical center diagnosed with GIB using ICD-9/10 codes from 2014 to 2018. A total of 1,889 patients were identified, and validation criteria such as "GI or hepatology consult note", type and screen, pantoprazole, or octreotide drip" were used, which resulted in 997 patients, out of which 369 had a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Propensity score matching was done for baseline variables (age, sex, and race), ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, ventilator days, and vasopressor use. As a result, 88 patients were included in the final analysis, with 44 in TEG and 44 in non-TEG group. A sub-group analysis was done in 46 patients with cirrhosis, 23 in TEG group and 23 in non-TEG group after propensity score matching. There was significantly higher total blood volume (4,207 mL vs. 2,568 mL, P = 0.04) in the TEG group as compared to the non-TEG group, including total volume of cryoprecipitate (80 mL vs. 55 mL, P = 0.03) and total volume of platelet (543 mL vs. 327 mL, P = 0.03). In the cirrhosis sub-group, there was no significant difference in the amount of blood products transfused between the two groups. This study revealed that TEG is not superior to conventional coagulation parameters in limiting the volume of blood product transfusion in major GIB patients in ICU settings.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
The use of thromboelastography (TEG) has demonstrated decreased blood product utilization in patients with specific etiologies of major gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), such as variceal and non-variceal bleeding in cirrhosis patients; however, in a non-cirrhosis patient with GIB, there is far less evidence in the literature. Our retrospective study compares the effect of TEG-guided blood product utilization in patients with major GIB with all etiologies, including cirrhosis, admitted to medical intensive care unit (MICU).
Methods UNASSIGNED
A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients admitted to the MICU of a tertiary academic medical center diagnosed with GIB using ICD-9/10 codes from 2014 to 2018. A total of 1,889 patients were identified, and validation criteria such as "GI or hepatology consult note", type and screen, pantoprazole, or octreotide drip" were used, which resulted in 997 patients, out of which 369 had a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Propensity score matching was done for baseline variables (age, sex, and race), ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, ventilator days, and vasopressor use. As a result, 88 patients were included in the final analysis, with 44 in TEG and 44 in non-TEG group. A sub-group analysis was done in 46 patients with cirrhosis, 23 in TEG group and 23 in non-TEG group after propensity score matching.
Results UNASSIGNED
There was significantly higher total blood volume (4,207 mL vs. 2,568 mL, P = 0.04) in the TEG group as compared to the non-TEG group, including total volume of cryoprecipitate (80 mL vs. 55 mL, P = 0.03) and total volume of platelet (543 mL vs. 327 mL, P = 0.03). In the cirrhosis sub-group, there was no significant difference in the amount of blood products transfused between the two groups.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
This study revealed that TEG is not superior to conventional coagulation parameters in limiting the volume of blood product transfusion in major GIB patients in ICU settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38189039
doi: 10.14740/jocmr5022
pmc: PMC10769601
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

431-437

Informations de copyright

Copyright 2023, Nepal et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Chhabindra Nepal (C)

Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Faith Regional Health Services, Norfolk, NE, USA.

Ojbindra Kc (O)

Department of Hospital Medicine, Faith Regional Health Services, Norfolk, NE, USA.

Manisha Koirala (M)

Department of Hospital Medicine, Faith Regional Health Services, Norfolk, NE, USA.

Ananta Subedi (A)

Department of Hospital Medicine, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.

Rakshya Sharma (R)

Department of Hospital Medicine, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.

Srinadh Annangi (S)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Suha Jabak (S)

Division of Gastroenterology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Said Chaaban (S)

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.

Classifications MeSH