The effect of level of anxiety about climate change on the use of feminine hygiene products.

anxiety climate change eco-friendly environmental impact menstrual products sustainability

Journal

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
ISSN: 1879-3479
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0210174

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jan 2024
Historique:
revised: 05 12 2023
received: 16 05 2023
accepted: 11 12 2023
medline: 8 1 2024
pubmed: 8 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between women's menstrual hygiene product use and their level of concern around climate change as well as to identify the variables influencing this relationship. In all, 978 women between the ages of 18 and 49 who were of reproductive age participated in this descriptive cross-sectional study. The CHERRIES criteria were followed in conducting the online survey. Data were gathered using the "personal information form" and the Climate Change Anxiety Scale for Women's Health The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, multiple linear regression, and logistic regression. Women were more prone to using throwaway goods than eco-friendly, sanitary goods when their climate change worry level was lower. Age, education level, region of residence, and the intensity of menstrual bleeding have an impact on the hygiene products used during the menstrual cycle, whereas environmental pollution in the area of residence and a woman's allergy status have an impact on the level of climate change anxiety concerning a woman's health. Women who are worried about how climate change will affect their health prefer to purchase sustainable/eco-friendly items. Starting in adolescence, women can receive advice about the use of sustainable products from health experts who are primarily responsible for women's health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38189102
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15324
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Références

Agache I, Sampath V, Aguilera J, et al. Climate change and global health: a call to more research and more action. Allergy. 2022;77(5):1389-1407. doi:10.1111/all.15229
Rocque RJ, Beaudoin C, Ndjaboue R, et al. Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e046333. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046333
Ahuja P, Singh N. Sustainable menstrual products: the challenges ahead. Asian J Women's Stud. 2022;28(3):397-411. doi:10.1080/12259276.2022.2098896
Hait A, Powers SE. The value of reusable feminine hygiene products evaluated by comparative environmental life cycle assessment. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;150:104422. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104422
Spinks R. Disposable tampons aren't sustainable, but do women want to talk about it. The Guardian. 2023. Accessed Feb 13, 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/apr/27/disposable-tampons-arent-sustainable-but-do-women-want-to-talk-about-it
Peberdy E, Jones A, Green D. A study into public awareness of the environmental impact of menstrual products and product choice. Sustainability. 2019;11(2):473. doi:10.3390/su11020473
Ashley R, Blackwood D, Souter N, et al. Sustainable disposal of domestic sanitary waste. J Environ Eng. 2005;131(2):206-215. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:2(206)
Oster E, Thornton R. Determinants of technology adoption: Private value and peer effects in menstrual cup take-up. 2009. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w14828/w14828.pdf
Newswire G. Global Feminine Hygiene Products Market (2020 to 2025) - Developing Eco-Friendly Feminine Hygiene Products Presents Opportunities. https://www.globenewswire.com/fr/news-release/2020/12/01/2137323/0/en/Global-Feminine-Hygiene-Products-Market-2020-to-2025-Developing-Eco-Friendly-Feminine-Hygiene-Products-Presents-Opportunities.html
Weir C. In The Red: A private economic cost and qualitative analysis of environmental and health implications for five menstrual products. 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10222/76546
Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
Süğüt D, Avcibay Vurgec B, Atik AD. Kadın Sağlığına Yönelik İklim Değişikliği Kaygı Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi; 2022. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using Multivariate Statistics. Vol 6. Pearson; 2013:497-516.
Ratter BM, Philipp KH, von Storch H. Between hype and decline: recent trends in public perception of climate change. Environ Sci Policy. 2012;18:3-8. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.12.007
Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA. Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(5):479-487. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
Luschkova D, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Ludwig A. Climate change and allergies. Allergo J Int. 2022;31(4):114-120. doi:10.1007/s40629-022-00212-x
Jenerowicz D, Silny W, Danczak-Pazdrowska A, Polanska A, Osmola-Mankowska A, Olek-Hrab K. Environmental factors and allergic diseases. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19(3):475-481.
Scullion R. ‘Period Poverty’: Why No One Is Talking About Eco-Friendly Solutions. https://www.passblue.com/2017/11/30/period-poverty-why-no-one-is-talking-about-eco-friendly-solutions/
Borowski AM. Are American Women Turning to Reusable and Greener Menstrual Products Due to Health and Environmental Pollution Concerns?. Master of Science Rochester Institute of Technology; 2011.
Abdul-Wahab SA, Abdo J. The effects of demographic factors on the environmental awareness of Omani citizens. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 2010;16(2):380-401. doi:10.1080/10807031003670410
Kilci Erciyas ŞE, Cirban E, Kalayci M, Sahin NA, Aydoğmus A. Knowledge and attitudes of women of reproductive age regarding the use of menstrual caps. Med J West Black Sea. 2022;6(1):115-124. doi:10.29058/mjwbs.1023079
Pedrini M, Ferri LM. Socio-demographical antecedents of responsible consumerism propensity. Int J Consum Stud. 2014;38(2):127-138. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12074
Hennegan J, Kibira SP, Exum NG, Schwab KJ, Makumbi FE, Bukenya J. ‘I do what a woman should do’: a grounded theory study of women's menstrual experiences at work in Mukono District, Uganda. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(11):e003433. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003433

Auteurs

Yasemin Hamlaci Baskaya (Y)

Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Nazlı Unlu Bidik (N)

Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Department of Midwifery, Institute of Health Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Busra Yolcu (B)

Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.
Department of Midwifery, Institute of Health Sciences, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH