SF-6D Normative Values Among Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: Results Based on Real-World Evidence from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg).
Bariatric surgery
Health preference
Normative value
Quality-adjusted life years
Real-world data
SF-6D
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2024
08 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
20
10
2023
accepted:
19
12
2023
revised:
18
12
2023
medline:
8
1
2024
pubmed:
8
1
2024
entrez:
8
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The SF-6D index can be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years in economic evaluations, which is required by reimbursement agencies and national advisory bodies, including the Swedish ones. However, despite that SF-36 has been largely applied among patients undergoing bariatric surgery, almost no study has accessed the short form six-dimensions (SF-6D) after bariatric surgery. To establish normative values for the SF-6D index among patients undergoing bariatric surgery. All patients who received bariatric surgery in Sweden between 2011-01-01 and 2019-03-31 were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Information includes patients' sociodemographic characteristics, details regarding the procedure, and postsurgical conditions. The SF-36 is applied at baseline and at follow-up years 1, 2, and 5. The multiple sequential imputation method was applied to handle missingness on SF-6D items. Based on the UK tariff, the SF-6D preference scores were calculated. The normative values for the mean (SD) SF-6D index were reported by timepoint and surgical complications for men and women, respectively. Multivariate analyses were applied to investigate how the SF-6D index is associated with timepoint, controlling for age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities in a stepwise manner. The SF-6D index increased at 1 year relative to baseline and was roughly maintained at the same level at 2 years. The normative value of the SF-6D index can be used in economic evaluations for bariatric surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The SF-6D index can be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years in economic evaluations, which is required by reimbursement agencies and national advisory bodies, including the Swedish ones. However, despite that SF-36 has been largely applied among patients undergoing bariatric surgery, almost no study has accessed the short form six-dimensions (SF-6D) after bariatric surgery.
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To establish normative values for the SF-6D index among patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
All patients who received bariatric surgery in Sweden between 2011-01-01 and 2019-03-31 were obtained from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry (SOReg). Information includes patients' sociodemographic characteristics, details regarding the procedure, and postsurgical conditions. The SF-36 is applied at baseline and at follow-up years 1, 2, and 5. The multiple sequential imputation method was applied to handle missingness on SF-6D items. Based on the UK tariff, the SF-6D preference scores were calculated. The normative values for the mean (SD) SF-6D index were reported by timepoint and surgical complications for men and women, respectively. Multivariate analyses were applied to investigate how the SF-6D index is associated with timepoint, controlling for age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities in a stepwise manner.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The SF-6D index increased at 1 year relative to baseline and was roughly maintained at the same level at 2 years. The normative value of the SF-6D index can be used in economic evaluations for bariatric surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38189900
doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-07024-0
pii: 10.1007/s11695-023-07024-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
ID : 2018-00896
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Branca F, Nikogosian H, Lobstein T, World Health Organization, editors. The challenge of obesity in the WHO European region and the strategies for response: summary. Copenhagen: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2007.
Tremmel M, Gerdtham UG, Nilsson PM, Saha S. Economic burden of obesity: a systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2017 Apr [cited 2019 Sep 2];14(4). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5409636/
Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Donato KA, et al. Executive summary: guidelines (2013) for the management of overweight and obesity in adults. Obesity. 2014;22(S2):S5-39.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Obesity: guidance on the prevention, identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in adults and children [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 20]. Report No.: CG43. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg43
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient -- update: Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):159.
Sundbom M, Hedberg J, Marsk R, Boman L, Bylund A, Hedenbro J, et al. Substantial decrease in comorbidity 5 years after gastric bypass: a population-based study from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg 2016;1.
Strazzullo P, D’Elia L, Cairella G, et al. Excess body weight and incidence of stroke: meta-analysis of prospective studies with 2 million participants. Stroke. 2010;41(5):e418–26.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576967
pubmed: 20299666
Kahan S, Williams A. In adults with obesity, metabolic–bariatric surgery vs. usual care is associated with lower all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(9):JC101.
doi: 10.7326/ACPJ202109210-101
pubmed: 34487444
WHOQOL - Measuring quality of life| The World Health Organization [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 8]. https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol
Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: the assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. 2nd ed. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2006.
Coulman KD, Abdelrahman T, Owen-Smith A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in bariatric surgery: a systematic review of standards of reporting. Obes Rev. 2013;14(9):707–20.
doi: 10.1111/obr.12041
pubmed: 23639053
Hachem A, Brennan L. Quality of life outcomes of bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(2):395–409.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1940-z
pubmed: 26494369
Lindekilde N, Gladstone BP, Lübeck M, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(8):639–51.
doi: 10.1111/obr.12294
pubmed: 26094664
Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271–92.
doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00130-8
pubmed: 11939242
The University of Sheffield. The SF-6D: an internationally adopted measure for valuing health and assessing the cost-effectiveness of health care interventions [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Dec 8]. https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/economics/research/impact-and-knowledge-exchange/sf6d
Drummond MF, Sculpher M, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 404.
doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001
Li T, Hutfless S, Scharfstein DO, et al. Standards should be applied in the prevention and handling of missing data for patient-centered outcomes research: a systematic review and expert consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(1):15–32.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.013
pubmed: 24262770
pmcid: 4631258
O’Connor PJ. Normative data: their definition, interpretation, and importance for primary care physicians. Fam Med. 1990;22(4):307–11.
pubmed: 2200734
Sundbom M, Näslund I, Näslund E, et al. High acquisition rate and internal validity in the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis Off J Am Soc Bariatr Surg. 2021;17(3):606–14.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.017
Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the international quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):903–12.
doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00081-X
pubmed: 9817107
Monica 1776 Main Street Santa, California 90401–3208. 36-item short form survey from the RAND medical outcomes study [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 29]. https://www.rand.org/health/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form.html
Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42(9):851–9.
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000135827.18610.0d
pubmed: 15319610
ScHARR Outcomes team the University of Sheffield. SF-6D & SF-6Dv2 - Calculating QALYs from the SF-36, SF-12 and the standalone SF-6Dv2 [Internet]. [cited 2023 Dec 8]. https://licensing.sheffield.ac.uk/product/SF-6D/print
Sun S, Luo N, Stenberg E, et al. Sequential multiple imputation for real-world health-related quality of life missing data after bariatric surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10827.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710827
pubmed: 36078543
pmcid: 9518315
Kleiber C, Zeileis A. AER: applied econometrics with R [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 15]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AER
Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019. https://www.R-project.org/ .
StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 17. College station. StataCorp LLC; 2021.
Kolotkin RL, Andersen JR. A systematic review of reviews: exploring the relationship between obesity, weight loss and health-related quality of life: Quality of life systematic review of reviews. Clin Obes. 2017;7(5):273–89.
doi: 10.1111/cob.12203
pubmed: 28695722
pmcid: 5600094
Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt J, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess [Internet]. 2009 Sep [cited 2019 Oct 11];13(41). https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta/hta13410/
Colquitt JL, Pickett K, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for weight loss in adults [Internet]. 2014 Aug [cited 2017 Feb 6]. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). Report No.: No.: CD003641. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.proxy.kib.ki.se/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4/abstract
Colquitt JL, Picot J, Loveman E, et al. Surgery for obesity. In: The Cochrane Collaboration, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009 [cited 2016 Jan 19]. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub3
Lee WJ, Huang MT, Yu PJ, et al. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparison. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):626–34.
doi: 10.1381/096089204323093390
pubmed: 15186629
Stenberg E, Näslund I, Persson C, et al. The association between socioeconomic factors and weight loss 5 years after gastric bypass surgery. Int J Obes 2005. 2020;44(11):2279–90.