Cost and utilization analysis of concurrent versus staged testicular prosthesis implantation for radical orchiectomy.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
05
11
2023
accepted:
18
12
2023
medline:
8
1
2024
pubmed:
8
1
2024
entrez:
8
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
American Urological Association guidelines recommend testicular prosthesis discussion prior to orchiectomy. Utilization may be low. We compared outcomes and care utilization between concurrent implant (CI) and staged implant (SI) insertion after radical orchiectomy. The MarketScan Commercial claims database (2008-2017) was queried for men ages >18 years who underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular mass, stratified as orchiectomy with no implant, CI, or SI. 90-day outcomes included rate of reoperation, readmission, emergency department (ED) presentation, and outpatient visits. Regression models provided rate ratio comparison. 8803 patients (8564 no implant, 190 CI, 49 SI; 2.7% implant rate) were identified with no difference in age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, insurance plan, additional cancer treatment, or metastasis. Median perioperative cost at orchiectomy (+/- implant) for no implant, CI, and SI were $5682 (3648-8554), $7823 (5403-10973), and $5380 (4130-10521), respectively (p<0.001). Median perioperative cost for SI at implantation was $8180 (4920-14591) for a total cost (orchiectomy + implant) of $13650 (5380 + 8180). CI patients were more likely to have follow-up (p = 0.006) with more visits (p = 0.030) compared to the SI group post-implantation but had similar follow-up (p = 0.065) and less visits (p = 0.025) compared to the SI patients' post-orchiectomy period. Overall explant rates were 4.7% for CI and 14.3% for SI (p = 0.04) with a median time to explant of 166 (IQR: 135-210) and 40 days (IQR: 9.5-141.5; p = 0.06). Median cost of removal was $2060 (IQR: 967-2880). CI placement has less total perioperative cost, lower explant rate, and similar postoperative utilization to SI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38190399
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296735
pii: PONE-D-23-36556
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0296735Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2024 Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Dr. Patel has the following to disclose: • Apta Pharma – Equity interest • Endo Pharmaceuticals – Advisor Dr. Hsieh has the following to disclose: • Boston Scientific – Advisor, consultant • Endo Pharmaceuticals – Advisor, consultant.
Références
Andrologia. 2020 Jul;52(6):e13613
pubmed: 32352182
Am J Mens Health. 2019 Jul-Aug;13(4):1557988319861019
pubmed: 31359823
Semin Oncol. 2009 Oct;36(5):432-8
pubmed: 19835738
J Urol. 1993 Mar;149(3):498-501
pubmed: 8382321
Psychooncology. 2022 Sep;31(9):1459-1473
pubmed: 35789023
Int J Androl. 2011 Apr;34(2):183-92
pubmed: 20550599
BJU Int. 1999 Dec;84(9):1043-5
pubmed: 10571632
J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Pt 1):1427-30
pubmed: 15371861
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Dec;17(12):1557-1568
pubmed: 31805527
Urology. 1986 Nov;28(5):388-90
pubmed: 3787899
J Urol. 2019 Aug;202(2):272-281
pubmed: 31059667
Urology. 2018 Apr;114:128-132
pubmed: 29288790
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:276-281
pubmed: 30381246
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):249-52
pubmed: 25168859
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Mar;48(4):571-8
pubmed: 22197218
J Urol. 1996 Feb;155(2):574-8
pubmed: 8558663