Effectiveness of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Against Herpes Zoster in a Real-World Setting.


Journal

Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 8 1 2024
pubmed: 8 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

A 2-dose series of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was 97% effective against herpes zoster (HZ) in a pivotal clinical trial. To evaluate real-world effectiveness of RZV against HZ. Prospective cohort study. Four health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Persons aged 50 years or older. The outcome was incident HZ defined by a diagnosis with an antiviral prescription. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard of HZ in vaccinated persons compared with unvaccinated persons, with adjustment for covariates. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as 1 minus the adjusted hazard ratio and was estimated by time since the last RZV dose and by corticosteroid use. The study included nearly 2.0 million persons who contributed 7.6 million person-years of follow-up. After adjustment, VE of 1 dose was 64% and VE of 2 doses was 76%. After 1 dose only, VE was 70% during the first year, 45% during the second year, 48% during the third year, and 52% after the third year. After 2 doses, VE was 79% during the first year, 75% during the second year, and 73% during the third and fourth years. Vaccine effectiveness was 65% in persons who received corticosteroids before vaccination and 77% in those who did not. Herpes zoster could not be identified as accurately in these observational data as in the previous clinical trials. Two doses of RZV were highly effective, although less effective than in the previous clinical trials. Two-dose effectiveness waned very little during the 4 years of follow-up. However, 1-dose effectiveness waned substantially after 1 year, underscoring the importance of the second dose. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
A 2-dose series of recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was 97% effective against herpes zoster (HZ) in a pivotal clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE UNASSIGNED
To evaluate real-world effectiveness of RZV against HZ.
DESIGN UNASSIGNED
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING UNASSIGNED
Four health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink.
PARTICIPANTS UNASSIGNED
Persons aged 50 years or older.
MEASUREMENTS UNASSIGNED
The outcome was incident HZ defined by a diagnosis with an antiviral prescription. Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard of HZ in vaccinated persons compared with unvaccinated persons, with adjustment for covariates. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated as 1 minus the adjusted hazard ratio and was estimated by time since the last RZV dose and by corticosteroid use.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
The study included nearly 2.0 million persons who contributed 7.6 million person-years of follow-up. After adjustment, VE of 1 dose was 64% and VE of 2 doses was 76%. After 1 dose only, VE was 70% during the first year, 45% during the second year, 48% during the third year, and 52% after the third year. After 2 doses, VE was 79% during the first year, 75% during the second year, and 73% during the third and fourth years. Vaccine effectiveness was 65% in persons who received corticosteroids before vaccination and 77% in those who did not.
LIMITATION UNASSIGNED
Herpes zoster could not be identified as accurately in these observational data as in the previous clinical trials.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
Two doses of RZV were highly effective, although less effective than in the previous clinical trials. Two-dose effectiveness waned very little during the 4 years of follow-up. However, 1-dose effectiveness waned substantially after 1 year, underscoring the importance of the second dose.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE UNASSIGNED
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38190712
doi: 10.7326/M23-2023
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Ousseny Zerbo (O)

Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California (O.Z., J.B., B.F., N.L., K.G., N.P.K.).

Joan Bartlett (J)

Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California (O.Z., J.B., B.F., N.L., K.G., N.P.K.).

Bruce Fireman (B)

Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California (O.Z., J.B., B.F., N.L., K.G., N.P.K.).

Ned Lewis (N)

Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California (O.Z., J.B., B.F., N.L., K.G., N.P.K.).

Kristin Goddard (K)

Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California (O.Z., J.B., B.F., N.L., K.G., N.P.K.).

Kathleen Dooling (K)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (K.D., J.D.).

Jonathan Duffy (J)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (K.D., J.D.).

Jason Glanz (J)

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado (J.G.).

Allison Naleway (A)

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon (A.N.).

James G Donahue (JG)

Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin (J.G.D.).

Nicola P Klein (NP)

Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California (O.Z., J.B., B.F., N.L., K.G., N.P.K.).

Classifications MeSH