Pattern of prescriptions and prudent use of antimicrobial in horse practice at a Veterinary Teaching Hospital.

Antimicrobial prescription Equine practice Prudent use

Journal

Research in veterinary science
ISSN: 1532-2661
Titre abrégé: Res Vet Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0401300

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 13 02 2023
revised: 18 07 2023
accepted: 03 01 2024
medline: 9 1 2024
pubmed: 9 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Antimicrobial prescriptions of the University of Pisa and their compliance with prudent use recommendations were investigated over 11 years (2011-2021). At least one antimicrobial was always prescribed in surgical prophylaxis for the suture of wounds and in 33% of horses with signs of disease of a body system. Antimicrobials were administered in monotherapy (48%) in fixed dose combinations (21%) and empirical combinations (31%). Antimicrobials were mostly (63%) administered by parenteral route, while oral and topical antimicrobials accounted for 14% and 23% of prescriptions, respectively. Gentamicin, benzylpenicillin and ceftiofur were the most prescribed antimicrobials; aminoglycosides, penicillins and cephalosporins were the most common class of antimicrobial prescribed. Protected antimicrobials (WHO HPCIA and rifampicin) represented 24% of antimicrobial dispensations. The pattern of classes of antimicrobial used by body system was broad and included up to eight different pharmaceutical classes. The heterogeneity of antimicrobial use was confirmed by the estimate of the prescription diversity index. Antimicrobial prescriptions were in compliance with prudent use recommendations in terms of availability of diagnosis, respect of the dose range and duration of treatment On the contrary, principles of appropriate antimicrobial use have only been partially observed in relation to off-label use, use of antimicrobials in empirical combination, use of antimicrobial susceptibility tests and use of protected antimicrobials, suggesting that additional interventions are required to improve the responsible use of antimicrobials use in our equine practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38190777
pii: S0034-5288(24)00006-7
doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105140
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105140

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Samanta Bacci (S)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Valentina Meucci (V)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy. Electronic address: valentina.meucci@unipi.it.

Micaela Sgorbini (M)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Lucia De Marchi (L)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Andrea Pirone (A)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Carlo Pretti (C)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Rosalba Tognetti (R)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Luigi Intorre (L)

Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Viale delle Piagge, 2, Italy.

Classifications MeSH