rTMS effects on urges and severity of tobacco use disorder operate independently of a retrieval-extinction component and involve frontal-striatal pathways.

Craving DLPFC Retrieval–extinction TUD rTMS

Journal

Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 30 08 2023
revised: 27 11 2023
accepted: 03 01 2024
medline: 9 1 2024
pubmed: 9 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although smoking remains a leading cause of preventable disease, the treatment options for smoking are limited. The present study evaluated the neural features underlying effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for reducing smoking cravings. In addition, the efficacy of a simulated retrieval-extinction procedure to augment rTMS efficacy was examined. Sixty-one individuals with tobacco use disorder (TUD) were randomized into three groups: classic rTMS, retrieval rTMS (viewed smoking videos before rTMS), and sham rTMS. rTMS was performed on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over 5 days using a standard figure-8 coil. Smoking cravings and brain responses to smoking cues were measured before and after rTMS treatment. Changes in functional connectivity (FC) among different brain regions were calculated. rTMS reduced smoking urges in TUD. Both active-rTMS groups demonstrated greater activations of the DLPFC, caudate, and bilateral insula relative to the sham group. Increased FC was observed between executive and reward network brain regions, and decreased FC was observed within reward network regions. Compared with standard rTMS, retrieval-extinction rTMS demonstrated similar outcomes and was associated with less activation of the medial frontal gyrus. rTMS increased activations in brain regions implicated in executive control and reward processing. Strengthened prefrontal-striatal pathway suggests that rTMS enhanced top-down control over smoking cravings. The retrieval-extinction process, although associated with some different and multiple similar neural correlates as the standard rTMS, did not enhance cessation outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although smoking remains a leading cause of preventable disease, the treatment options for smoking are limited. The present study evaluated the neural features underlying effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for reducing smoking cravings. In addition, the efficacy of a simulated retrieval-extinction procedure to augment rTMS efficacy was examined.
METHODS METHODS
Sixty-one individuals with tobacco use disorder (TUD) were randomized into three groups: classic rTMS, retrieval rTMS (viewed smoking videos before rTMS), and sham rTMS. rTMS was performed on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) over 5 days using a standard figure-8 coil. Smoking cravings and brain responses to smoking cues were measured before and after rTMS treatment. Changes in functional connectivity (FC) among different brain regions were calculated.
RESULTS RESULTS
rTMS reduced smoking urges in TUD. Both active-rTMS groups demonstrated greater activations of the DLPFC, caudate, and bilateral insula relative to the sham group. Increased FC was observed between executive and reward network brain regions, and decreased FC was observed within reward network regions. Compared with standard rTMS, retrieval-extinction rTMS demonstrated similar outcomes and was associated with less activation of the medial frontal gyrus.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
rTMS increased activations in brain regions implicated in executive control and reward processing. Strengthened prefrontal-striatal pathway suggests that rTMS enhanced top-down control over smoking cravings. The retrieval-extinction process, although associated with some different and multiple similar neural correlates as the standard rTMS, did not enhance cessation outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38190858
pii: S0165-0327(24)00057-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.048
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts exist. Marc N. Potenza discloses that he has consulted for and advised Game Day Data, Addiction Policy Forum, AXA, Idorsia, Baria-Tek, and Opiant Therapeutics; been involved in a patent application involving Novartis and Yale; received research support from the Mohegan Sun Casino, Children and Screens and the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling; consulted for or advised legal and gambling entities on issues related to impulse control, internet use and addictive behaviors; provided clinical care related to impulse-control and addictive behaviors; performed grant reviews; edited journals/journal sections; given academic lectures in grand rounds, CME events and other clinical/scientific venues; and generated books or chapters for publishers of mental health texts.

Auteurs

Shuang Li (S)

Department of Psychology, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, PR China; Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China.

Xuefeng Ma (X)

Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China.

Hong'an Chen (H)

Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China.

Min Wang (M)

Department of Psychology, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, PR China.

Yanbin Zheng (Y)

Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China.

Bo Yang (B)

Department of Psychology, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, PR China.

Haosen Ni (H)

Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China.

Marc N Potenza (MN)

School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Guang-Heng Dong (GH)

Department of Psychology, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, PR China; Center for Cognition and Brain Disorders, The Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: dongguangheng@ynnu.edu.cn.

Classifications MeSH