Validity of self-reported Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment from questionnaire and interview surveys of the JPHC-NEXT study: comparison with prescription history from insurance claims data.

Claims database Epidemiology Helicobacter pylori Japanese Validation

Journal

Journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 1349-9092
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9607688

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 1 2024
pubmed: 9 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We aimed to evaluate the validity of self-administered questionnaire surveys and face-to-face interview surveys for the detection of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. Participants were a cohort, aged 40-74 years, living in three different locations of Japan, who took part in the baseline survey (2011-2012) of the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study for the Next Generation (JPHC-NEXT). Five years after the baseline survey, a questionnaire and interview survey were independently conducted to determine the history of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment over the 5-year period. Prescription of Helicobacter pylori eradication medications in national insurance claims data from the baseline survey to the 5-year survey was used as a reference standard. In total, 15,760 questionnaire surveys and 8,006 interview surveys were included in the analysis. There were 3,471 respondents to the questionnaire and 2,398 respondents to the interview who reported having received Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment within the past five years. Comparison of the questionnaire survey to national insurance claims data showed a sensitivity of 95.1% (2213/2328), specificity of 90.6% (12174/13432), positive predictive value of 63.8% (2213/3471), negative predictive value of 99.1% (12174/12289), and Cohen's Kappa value of 0.71. Respective values of the interview survey were 94.4% (1694/1795), 88.7% (5507/6211), 70.6% (1694/2398), 98.2% (5507/5608), and 0.74. Both the questionnaire and the interview showed high sensitivity, high specificity, and good agreement with the insurance claim prescriptions data. Some participants may have received eradication treatment without going through the public insurance claim database, resulting in a low positive predictive value.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We aimed to evaluate the validity of self-administered questionnaire surveys and face-to-face interview surveys for the detection of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy.
METHODS METHODS
Participants were a cohort, aged 40-74 years, living in three different locations of Japan, who took part in the baseline survey (2011-2012) of the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study for the Next Generation (JPHC-NEXT). Five years after the baseline survey, a questionnaire and interview survey were independently conducted to determine the history of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment over the 5-year period. Prescription of Helicobacter pylori eradication medications in national insurance claims data from the baseline survey to the 5-year survey was used as a reference standard.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 15,760 questionnaire surveys and 8,006 interview surveys were included in the analysis. There were 3,471 respondents to the questionnaire and 2,398 respondents to the interview who reported having received Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment within the past five years. Comparison of the questionnaire survey to national insurance claims data showed a sensitivity of 95.1% (2213/2328), specificity of 90.6% (12174/13432), positive predictive value of 63.8% (2213/3471), negative predictive value of 99.1% (12174/12289), and Cohen's Kappa value of 0.71. Respective values of the interview survey were 94.4% (1694/1795), 88.7% (5507/6211), 70.6% (1694/2398), 98.2% (5507/5608), and 0.74.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Both the questionnaire and the interview showed high sensitivity, high specificity, and good agreement with the insurance claim prescriptions data. Some participants may have received eradication treatment without going through the public insurance claim database, resulting in a low positive predictive value.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38191180
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20230168
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Tomomi Kihara (T)

Department of Public Health Medicine, Institute of Medicine, and Health Service Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba.

Kazumasa Yamagishi (K)

Department of Public Health Medicine, Institute of Medicine, and Health Service Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba.
Ibaraki Western Medical Center.

Takuya Imatoh (T)

Division of Cohort Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center.

Hikaru Ihira (H)

Division of Cohort Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center.

Atsushi Goto (A)

Department of Health Data Science, Graduate School of Data Science, Yokohama City University.

Hiroyasu Iso (H)

Department of Public Health Medicine, Institute of Medicine, and Health Service Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba.
Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine.

Norie Sawada (N)

Division of Cohort Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center.

Shoichiro Tsugane (S)

Division of Cohort Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center.
National Institute of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition.

Manami Inoue (M)

Division of Cohort Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center.
Division of Prevention, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center.

Classifications MeSH