Preferences for virtual versus in-person mental and physical healthcare in Canada: a descriptive study from a cohort of youth and their parents enriched for severe mental illness.

Adolescent Health Health services research

Journal

BMJ paediatrics open
ISSN: 2399-9772
Titre abrégé: BMJ Paediatr Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101715309

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 19 07 2023
accepted: 21 11 2023
medline: 9 1 2024
pubmed: 9 1 2024
entrez: 8 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Virtual care may improve access to healthcare and may be well suited to digitally connected youth, but experts caution that privacy and technology barriers could perpetuate access inequities. Success of virtual care will depend on its alignment with patient preferences. However, information on preferences for virtual and in-person healthcare is missing, especially for youth. We sought to quantify preferences for and barriers to virtual versus in-person mental and physical healthcare in youth and their parents, including in vulnerable segments of the population such as families with a parent with severe mental illness (SMI). Participants were 219 youth and 326 parents from the Families Overcoming Risks and Building Opportunities for Wellbeing cohort from Canada, of which 61% of youth had at least one parent with SMI. Participants were interviewed about healthcare preferences and access to privacy/technology between October 2021 and December 2022. Overall, youth reported a preference for in-person mental (66.6%) and physical healthcare (74.7%) versus virtual care or no preference, and to a somewhat lesser degree, so did their parents (48.0% and 53.9%). Half of participants reported privacy/technology barriers to virtual care, with privacy being the most common barrier. Preferences and barriers varied as a function of parent SMI status, socioeconomic status and rural residence. The majority of youth and parents in this study prefer in-person healthcare, and the preference is stronger in youth and in vulnerable segments of the population. Lack of privacy may be a greater barrier to virtual care than access to technology.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Virtual care may improve access to healthcare and may be well suited to digitally connected youth, but experts caution that privacy and technology barriers could perpetuate access inequities. Success of virtual care will depend on its alignment with patient preferences. However, information on preferences for virtual and in-person healthcare is missing, especially for youth. We sought to quantify preferences for and barriers to virtual versus in-person mental and physical healthcare in youth and their parents, including in vulnerable segments of the population such as families with a parent with severe mental illness (SMI).
METHODS METHODS
Participants were 219 youth and 326 parents from the Families Overcoming Risks and Building Opportunities for Wellbeing cohort from Canada, of which 61% of youth had at least one parent with SMI. Participants were interviewed about healthcare preferences and access to privacy/technology between October 2021 and December 2022.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, youth reported a preference for in-person mental (66.6%) and physical healthcare (74.7%) versus virtual care or no preference, and to a somewhat lesser degree, so did their parents (48.0% and 53.9%). Half of participants reported privacy/technology barriers to virtual care, with privacy being the most common barrier. Preferences and barriers varied as a function of parent SMI status, socioeconomic status and rural residence.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The majority of youth and parents in this study prefer in-person healthcare, and the preference is stronger in youth and in vulnerable segments of the population. Lack of privacy may be a greater barrier to virtual care than access to technology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38191204
pii: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002197
doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002197
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Raegan Mazurka (R)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Emily Howes Vallis (EH)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Lucy Chen (L)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Kathryn Freeman (K)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Ross Langley (R)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Briana Ross (B)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Swasti Arora (S)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Mica Kahn (M)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Cynthia Howard (C)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Dara Liu (D)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Jill Cumby (J)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Maureen L Brennan (ML)

IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Samuel E Hickcox (SE)

Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Office of Addictions and Mental Health, Government of Nova Scotia, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Alexa L Bagnell (AL)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Lukas Propper (L)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Barbara Pavlova (B)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Rudolf Uher (R)

Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada uher@dal.ca.
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Classifications MeSH