Life-Course Socioeconomic Position and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Midlife: Evidence from the 1958 British Birth Cohort.
1958 British birth cohort
Life-course socioeconomic position
Mild cognitive impairment
NCDS
Journal
Journal of epidemiology and global health
ISSN: 2210-6014
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Glob Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101592084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Jan 2024
08 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
05
06
2023
accepted:
29
11
2023
medline:
9
1
2024
pubmed:
9
1
2024
entrez:
9
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Dementia has been the leading cause of death in the UK since 2015. Increasing evidence supports an association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and dementia onset in later life. However, limited studies have examined how life-course SEP influences the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an intermediate state potentially preceding dementia. Therefore, the present study aims to examine the relationship between life-course SEP and MCI amongst adults aged 50 years in Great Britain. We employed data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS), also known as the 1958 British Birth Cohort, to determine the associations between SEP and MCI in 6590 participants. We categorised life-course measures of SEP as stable high/low or moving upward/downward over the life course. We assessed MCI at age 50 using one standard deviation below the averaged combined scores from all cognitive tests available. We then used binary logistic regression to estimate the longitudinal associations between life-course SEP and MCI. Relative to those of a high SEP across the life course, participants who moved upward, downward, or remained at a low SEP were significantly associated with 25% (95% CI 1.02-1.54, p = 0.035), 70% (95% CI 1.27-2.27, p < 0.001), and 85% (95% CI 1.50-2.29, p < 0.001), respectively, higher odds of MCI, independent of all selected covariates. Lower life-course SEP was associated with significantly higher odds of MCI onset in middle life within the NCDS cohort. Public health policies targeting cognitive impairment should encompass a life-course approach to reduce socioeconomic inequalities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dementia has been the leading cause of death in the UK since 2015. Increasing evidence supports an association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and dementia onset in later life. However, limited studies have examined how life-course SEP influences the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an intermediate state potentially preceding dementia. Therefore, the present study aims to examine the relationship between life-course SEP and MCI amongst adults aged 50 years in Great Britain.
METHODS
METHODS
We employed data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS), also known as the 1958 British Birth Cohort, to determine the associations between SEP and MCI in 6590 participants. We categorised life-course measures of SEP as stable high/low or moving upward/downward over the life course. We assessed MCI at age 50 using one standard deviation below the averaged combined scores from all cognitive tests available. We then used binary logistic regression to estimate the longitudinal associations between life-course SEP and MCI.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Relative to those of a high SEP across the life course, participants who moved upward, downward, or remained at a low SEP were significantly associated with 25% (95% CI 1.02-1.54, p = 0.035), 70% (95% CI 1.27-2.27, p < 0.001), and 85% (95% CI 1.50-2.29, p < 0.001), respectively, higher odds of MCI, independent of all selected covariates.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Lower life-course SEP was associated with significantly higher odds of MCI onset in middle life within the NCDS cohort. Public health policies targeting cognitive impairment should encompass a life-course approach to reduce socioeconomic inequalities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38191951
doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00173-6
pii: 10.1007/s44197-023-00173-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : RO1AG017644
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Wittenberg R, Hu B, Barraza-Araiza L, Rehill A. Projections of older people with dementia and costs of dementia care in the United Kingdom, 2019–2040. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences; 2019 [online]. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/201911/cpec_report_november_2019.pdf . Accessed 18 May 2021.
Murayama H, Sugiyama M, Inagaki H, Ura C, Miyamae F, Edahiro A, Motokawa K, Okamura T, Awata S. The differential effects of age on the association between childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and subjective symptoms of dementia among older Japanese people. J Epidemiol. 2019;29:241–6.
doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20180002
pubmed: 30344195
pmcid: 6556439
Deckers K, Cadar D, van Boxtel MP, Verhey FR, Steptoe A, Köhler S. Modifiable risk factors explain socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk: evidence from a population-based prospective cohort study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(2):549–57.
doi: 10.3233/JAD-190541
pubmed: 31424404
pmcid: 6839472
Cadar D, Lassale C, Davies H, Llewellyn DJ, Batty GD, Steptoe A. Individual and area-based socioeconomic factors associated with dementia incidence in England: evidence from a 12-year follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(7):723–32.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.1012
Al Hazzouri AZ, Haan MN, Kalbfleisch JD, Galea S, Lisabeth LD, Aiello AE. Life-course socioeconomic position and incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment without dementia in older Mexican Americans: results from the Sacramento area Latino study on aging. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(10):1148–58.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq483
Chittleborough CR, Baum FE, Taylor AW, Hiller JE. A life-course approach to measuring socioeconomic position in population health surveillance systems. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60(11):981–92.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048694
pubmed: 17053288
pmcid: 2465478
Hugo J, Ganguli M. Dementia and cognitive impairment: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30(3):421–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2014.04.001
pubmed: 25037289
pmcid: 4104432
Gauthier S, Reisberg B, Zaudig M, Petersen RC, Ritchie K, Broich K, Belleville S, Brodaty H, Bennett D, Chertkow H, Cummings JL. Mild cognitive impairment. Lancet. 2006;367(9518):1262–70.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68542-5
pubmed: 16631882
Flitton M, Macdonald IA, Knight HM. Vitamin intake is associated with improved visuospatial and verbal semantic memory in middle-aged individuals. Nutr Neurosci. 2019;22(6):401–8.
doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2017.1395550
pubmed: 29098943
Bookheimer SY, Strojwas MH, Cohen MS, Saunders AM, Pericak-Vance MA, Mazziotta JC, Small GW. Patterns of brain activation in people at risk for Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(7):450–6.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008173430701
pubmed: 10944562
pmcid: 2831477
Braak H, Braak E. Evolution of neuronal changes in the course of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Ageing and Dementia; 1998, p. 127–140.
Sun R, Zhang Z. Leisure activities and cognitive impairment in old age: The role of life course socioeconomic status. Aging Mental Health. 2022;27:326–33.
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2046694
pubmed: 35467457
Muhammad T, Srivastava S, Sekher TV. Assessing socioeconomic inequalities in cognitive impairment among older adults: a study based on a cross-sectional survey in India. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03076-6
Li CY, Wu SC, Sung FC. Lifetime principal occupation and risk of cognitive impairment among the elderly. Ind Health. 2002;40(1):7–13.
doi: 10.2486/indhealth.40.7
pubmed: 11926519
Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Bian Y. A role of socioeconomic status in cognitive impairment among older adults in Macau: a decomposition approach. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:804307.
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.804307
pubmed: 35211006
pmcid: 8862725
Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, Berg L. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(3):397–405.
doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.3.397
pubmed: 11255443
Jongsiriyanyong S, Limpawattana P. Mild cognitive impairment in clinical practice: a review article. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018;33(8):500–7.
doi: 10.1177/1533317518791401
pubmed: 30068225
Chertkow H, Nasreddine Z, Joanette Y, Drolet V, Kirk J, Massoud F, Belleville S, Bergman H. Mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment, no dementia: Part A, Concept and diagnosis. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2007;3(4):266–82.
doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.07.013
pubmed: 19595948
Kreutzer JS, Caplan B, DeLuca J. Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology; with 199 figures and 139 tables. Berlin: Springer; 2011.
doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3
Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56(3):303–8.
doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303
pubmed: 10190820
Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;48(6):1258–70.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.035
Mostafa T, Narayanan M, Pongiglione B, Dodgeon B, Goodman A, Silverwood RJ, Ploubidis GB. Improving the plausibility of the missing at random assumption in the 1958 British birth cohort: a pragmatic data-driven approach. London: UCL Centre for Longitudinal Studies; 2020.
Coen RF, Kirby M, Swanwick GR, Maguire CP, Walsh J, Coakley D, O’Neill D, Lawlor BA. Performance on delayed word recall (DWR) fails to differentiate clearly between depression and Alzheimer’s disease. Psychol Med. 1998;28(2):495–6.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291797216491
pubmed: 9572106
Jak AJ, Bondi MW, Delano-Wood L, Wierenga C, Corey-Bloom J, Salmon DP, Delis DC. Quantification of five neuropsychological approaches to defining mild cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(5):368–75.
doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31819431d5
pubmed: 19390294
pmcid: 2743175
Sachs-Ericsson N, Blazer DG. The new DSM-5 diagnosis of mild neurocognitive disorder and its relation to research in mild cognitive impairment. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(1):2–12.
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.920303
pubmed: 24914889
Rutter M, Tizard J, Whitmore K. Education, health, and behaviour. Psychol Med. 1970;1(5):439.
Weyers S, Dragano N, Möbus S, Beck EM, Stang A, Möhlenkamp S, Jöckel KH, Erbel R, Siegrist J. Low socio-economic position is associated with poor social networks and social support: results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study. Int J Equity Health. 2008;7(1):1–7.
doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-13
Clark AM, DesMeules M, Luo W, Duncan AS, Wielgosz A. Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: risks and implications for care. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6(11):712–22.
doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.163
pubmed: 19770848
Hwang J, Shon C. Relationship between socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes: results from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2010–2012. BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e005710.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005710
pubmed: 25138810
pmcid: 4139629
Demakakos P, Marmot M, Steptoe A. Socioeconomic position and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: the ELSA study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(5):367–78.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9688-4
pubmed: 22539241
Smith BT, Lynch JW, Fox CS, Harper S, Abrahamowicz M, Almeida ND, Loucks EB. Life-course socioeconomic position and type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Framingham Offspring Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(4):438–47.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq379
pubmed: 21242301
pmcid: 3032804
Gilman SE, Kawachi I, Fitzmaurice GM, Buka SL. Socioeconomic status in childhood and the lifetime risk of major depression. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(2):359–67.
doi: 10.1093/ije/31.2.359
pubmed: 11980797
Melchior M, Chastang JF, Head J, Goldberg M, Zins M, Nabi H, Younès N. Socioeconomic position predicts long-term depression trajectory: a 13-year follow-up of the GAZEL cohort study. Mol Psychiatry. 2013;18(1):112–21.
doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.116
pubmed: 21931321
Grotto I, Huerta M, Sharabi Y. Hypertension and socioeconomic status. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2008;23(4):335–9.
doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283021c70
pubmed: 18520717
Llewellyn D, Bayer A. Risk factors for dementia, Factsheet 450LP. [ebook]; 2016. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/pdf/factsheet_risk_factors_for_dementia.pdf . Accessed 18 May 2021.
Lopez OL, Jagust WJ, DeKosky ST, Becker JT, Fitzpatrick A, Dulberg C, Breitner J, Lyketsos C, Jones B, Kawas C, Carlson M. Prevalence and classification of mild cognitive impairment in the Cardiovascular Health Study Cognition Study: part 1. Arch Neurol. 2003;60(10):1385–9.
doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.10.1385
pubmed: 14568808
Alonso A, Mosley TH, Gottesman RF, Catellier D, Sharrett AR, Coresh J. Risk of dementia hospitalisation associated with cardiovascular risk factors in midlife and older age: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(11):1194–201.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.176818
pubmed: 19692426
Das SK, Bose P, Biswas A, Dutt A, Banerjee TK, Hazra A, Raut DK, Chaudhuri A, Roy T. An epidemiologic study of mild cognitive impairment in Kolkata, India. Neurology. 2007;68(23):2019–26.
doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000264424.76759.e6
pubmed: 17548552
Scazufca M, Menezes PR, Araya R, Di Rienzo VD, Almeida OP, Gunnell D, Lawlor DA. Risk factors across the life course and dementia in a Brazilian population: results from the Sao Paulo Ageing & Health Study (SPAH). Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(4):879–90.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyn125
pubmed: 18583392
Fernández-Blázquez MA, Noriega-Ruiz B, Ávila-Villanueva M, Valentí-Soler M, Frades-Payo B, Del Ser T, Gómez-Ramírez J. Impact of individual and neighborhood dimensions of socioeconomic status on the prevalence of mild cognitive impairment over seven-year follow-up. Aging Ment Health. 2021;25(5):814–23.
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1725803
pubmed: 32067489