Acute coronary occlusion with vs. without ST-elevation: impact on procedural outcomes and long-term all-cause mortality.

Acute total occlusion Cardiogenic shock Myocardial infarction NSTEMI No reflow STEMI

Journal

European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
ISSN: 2058-1742
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101677796

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 9 1 2024
pubmed: 9 1 2024
entrez: 9 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Acute total occlusion (ATO) is diagnosed in a substantial proportion of patients with Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We compared procedural outcomes and long- term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with NSTEMI with vs. without ATO. We included patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing invasive coronary angiography between 2004 and 2019 at our center. ATO was defined as TIMI 0-1 flow in the infarct-related artery or TIMI 2-3 flow with highly elevated peak troponin (>100-folds the upper reference limit). Association between presentation and long-term mortality was evaluated using multivariable adjusted Cox regression analysis. From 2269 acute myocardial infarction patients (mean age 66 ± 13.2 years, 74% male), 664 patients with STEMI and 1605 patients with NSTEMI (471 [29.3%] with ATO) were included. ATO(+)NSTEMI had higher frequency of cardiogenic shock and no-reflow than ATO(-)NSTEMI with similar rates compared to STEMI patients (cardiogenic shock: 2.76 vs. 0.27 vs. 2.86%, p < 0.0001, p = 1; no-reflow: 4.03 vs. 0.18 vs. 3.17%, p < 0.0001, p = 0.54). ATO(+)NSTEMI and STEMI were associated with 60% and 55% increased incident mortality, as compared to ATO(-)NSTEMI (ATO(+)NSTEMI: 1.60[1.27-2.02], p < 0.0001, STEMI: 1.55[1.24-1.94], p < 0.0001). Likewise, left ventricular ejection fraction (48.5 ± 12.7 vs. 49.1±11 vs. 50.6 ± 11.8%, p = 0.5, p = 0.018) and global longitudinal strain (-15.2±-5.74 vs. -15.5±-4.84 vs. -16.3±-5.30%, p = 0.48, p = 0.016) in ATO(+)NSTEMI were comparable to STEMI but significantly worse than in ATO(-)NSTEMI. NSTEMI patients with ATO have unfavorable procedural outcomes, resulting in increased long-term mortality, resembling STEMI. Our findings suggest that the occlusion perspective provides more appropriate classification of acute myocardial infarction than differentiation into STEMI vs. NSTEMI.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Acute total occlusion (ATO) is diagnosed in a substantial proportion of patients with Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We compared procedural outcomes and long- term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with NSTEMI with vs. without ATO.
METHODS METHODS
We included patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing invasive coronary angiography between 2004 and 2019 at our center. ATO was defined as TIMI 0-1 flow in the infarct-related artery or TIMI 2-3 flow with highly elevated peak troponin (>100-folds the upper reference limit). Association between presentation and long-term mortality was evaluated using multivariable adjusted Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
From 2269 acute myocardial infarction patients (mean age 66 ± 13.2 years, 74% male), 664 patients with STEMI and 1605 patients with NSTEMI (471 [29.3%] with ATO) were included. ATO(+)NSTEMI had higher frequency of cardiogenic shock and no-reflow than ATO(-)NSTEMI with similar rates compared to STEMI patients (cardiogenic shock: 2.76 vs. 0.27 vs. 2.86%, p < 0.0001, p = 1; no-reflow: 4.03 vs. 0.18 vs. 3.17%, p < 0.0001, p = 0.54). ATO(+)NSTEMI and STEMI were associated with 60% and 55% increased incident mortality, as compared to ATO(-)NSTEMI (ATO(+)NSTEMI: 1.60[1.27-2.02], p < 0.0001, STEMI: 1.55[1.24-1.94], p < 0.0001). Likewise, left ventricular ejection fraction (48.5 ± 12.7 vs. 49.1±11 vs. 50.6 ± 11.8%, p = 0.5, p = 0.018) and global longitudinal strain (-15.2±-5.74 vs. -15.5±-4.84 vs. -16.3±-5.30%, p = 0.48, p = 0.016) in ATO(+)NSTEMI were comparable to STEMI but significantly worse than in ATO(-)NSTEMI.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
NSTEMI patients with ATO have unfavorable procedural outcomes, resulting in increased long-term mortality, resembling STEMI. Our findings suggest that the occlusion perspective provides more appropriate classification of acute myocardial infarction than differentiation into STEMI vs. NSTEMI.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38192031
pii: 7513171
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Mohammed Abusharekh (M)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Jürgen Kampf (J)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Iryna Dykun (I)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Kashif Souri (K)

The Elisabeth Hospital Recklinghausen, Department of Cardiology, Recklinghausen, Germany.

Viktoria Backmann (V)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Fadi Al-Rashid (F)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

R Alexander Jánosi (RA)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Matthias Totzeck (M)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Thomas Lawo (T)

The Elisabeth Hospital Recklinghausen, Department of Cardiology, Recklinghausen, Germany.

Tienush Rassaf (T)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Amir A Mahabadi (AA)

The West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH