DeepFND: an ensemble-based deep learning approach for the optimization and improvement of fake news detection in digital platform.

Deep learning DeepFND Ensemble model Fake news Joint feature extraction

Journal

PeerJ. Computer science
ISSN: 2376-5992
Titre abrégé: PeerJ Comput Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101660598

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 21 07 2023
accepted: 05 10 2023
medline: 9 1 2024
pubmed: 9 1 2024
entrez: 9 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Early identification of false news is now essential to save lives from the dangers posed by its spread. People keep sharing false information even after it has been debunked. Those responsible for spreading misleading information in the first place should face the consequences, not the victims of their actions. Understanding how misinformation travels and how to stop it is an absolute need for society and government. Consequently, the necessity to identify false news from genuine stories has emerged with the rise of these social media platforms. One of the tough issues of conventional methodologies is identifying false news. In recent years, neural network models' performance has surpassed that of classic machine learning approaches because of their superior feature extraction. This research presents Deep learning-based Fake News Detection (DeepFND). This technique has Visual Geometry Group 19 (VGG-19) and Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) ensemble models for identifying misinformation spread through social media. This system uses an ensemble deep learning (DL) strategy to extract characteristics from the article's text and photos. The joint feature extractor and the attention modules are used with an ensemble approach, including pre-training and fine-tuning phases. In this article, we utilized a unique customized loss function. In this research, we look at methods for detecting bogus news on the internet without human intervention. We used the Weibo, liar, PHEME, fake and real news, and Buzzfeed datasets to analyze fake and real news. Multiple methods for identifying fake news are compared and contrasted. Precision procedures have been used to calculate the proposed model's output. The model's 99.88% accuracy is better than expected.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38192452
doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1666
pii: cs-1666
pmc: PMC10773750
doi:

Types de publication

News

Langues

eng

Pagination

e1666

Informations de copyright

© 2023 K et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Vladimir Simic is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.

Auteurs

Venkatachalam K (V)

Department of Applied Cybernetics, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.

Badriyya B Al-Onazi (BB)

Department of Language Preparation, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Vladimir Simic (V)

Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.

Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee (EB)

Department of Industrial Engineering, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
MEU Research Unit, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.

Chiranjibe Jana (C)

Department of Applied Mathematics with Oceanology and Computer Programming, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, India.

Classifications MeSH