The impact of frailty and geriatric syndromes on metrics of acute care performance: results of a national day of care survey.
Acute care
Frailty
Geriatric syndromes
Older people
SAMBA
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
12
04
2023
revised:
24
09
2023
accepted:
02
10
2023
medline:
9
1
2024
pubmed:
9
1
2024
entrez:
9
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Frailty is associated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes in the acute hospital setting. We sought to determine whether frailty and related factors affected clinical processes such as time to assessment during emergency hospital admission within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. The Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit (SAMBA) is an annual cross-sectional day of care survey. SAMBA 2022 was conducted on Thursday 23rd June 2022. We assessed whether the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and presence of a geriatric syndrome affected performance against nationally recognised clinical quality indicators based on time to initial assessment and time to consultant review. CFS was graded into robust (CFS1-3), mild (CFS 4-5), moderate (CFS 6), severe (CFS7-8) and terminal illness (CFS 9). Plausible values were created for missing variables using multi-level multiple imputation. The association was described using mixed effect generalised linear models adjusting for initial National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and time of arrival. A total of 152 hospitals provided patient level data relating to 7248 emergency medical admissions. Patients with mild, moderate and severe frailty were less likely to be assessed within 4 h of arrival (adjusted OR, mild 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.96, moderate 0.67 95% CI 0.53-0.84, severe, 0.75 95% CI 0.58-0.96, terminally ill 0.59 95% CI 0.23-1.43) and less likely to be achieve the clinical quality indicator for consultant review (adjusted OR, mild 0.69 95% CI 0.58-0.83, moderate 0.55 95% CI 0.44-0.70, severe 0.54 95% CI 0.41-0.69, terminally ill 0.76 95% CI 0.42-1.5). Patients with geriatric syndromes were also less likely to be assessed within 4 h of arrival (adjusted OR 0.66 95% CI 0.56-0.76) or by a consultant within the recommended time frame (adjusted OR 0.45 95% CI 0.39-0.51). The difference was partially explained by differential use of SDEC pathways. Sub-group analysis of 5148 patients assessed outside of SDEC areas demonstrated patients with geriatric syndromes (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.83), but not frailty defined by CFS were less likely to be assessed within 4 h of arrival. Moderate and severe frailty and the presence of a geriatric syndrome were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving the consultant review standard (moderate, adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.94, severe adjusted OR 0.75 95% CI 0.58-0.96, geriatric syndrome adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.50-0.69). Frailty is associated with delayed clinical assessment. This association may suggest a systemic issue with clinical prioritisation, with important implications for acute care policy. The database for SAMBA is funded by the Society for Acute Medicine.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Frailty is associated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes in the acute hospital setting. We sought to determine whether frailty and related factors affected clinical processes such as time to assessment during emergency hospital admission within the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit (SAMBA) is an annual cross-sectional day of care survey. SAMBA 2022 was conducted on Thursday 23rd June 2022. We assessed whether the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and presence of a geriatric syndrome affected performance against nationally recognised clinical quality indicators based on time to initial assessment and time to consultant review. CFS was graded into robust (CFS1-3), mild (CFS 4-5), moderate (CFS 6), severe (CFS7-8) and terminal illness (CFS 9). Plausible values were created for missing variables using multi-level multiple imputation. The association was described using mixed effect generalised linear models adjusting for initial National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) and time of arrival.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
A total of 152 hospitals provided patient level data relating to 7248 emergency medical admissions. Patients with mild, moderate and severe frailty were less likely to be assessed within 4 h of arrival (adjusted OR, mild 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.96, moderate 0.67 95% CI 0.53-0.84, severe, 0.75 95% CI 0.58-0.96, terminally ill 0.59 95% CI 0.23-1.43) and less likely to be achieve the clinical quality indicator for consultant review (adjusted OR, mild 0.69 95% CI 0.58-0.83, moderate 0.55 95% CI 0.44-0.70, severe 0.54 95% CI 0.41-0.69, terminally ill 0.76 95% CI 0.42-1.5). Patients with geriatric syndromes were also less likely to be assessed within 4 h of arrival (adjusted OR 0.66 95% CI 0.56-0.76) or by a consultant within the recommended time frame (adjusted OR 0.45 95% CI 0.39-0.51). The difference was partially explained by differential use of SDEC pathways. Sub-group analysis of 5148 patients assessed outside of SDEC areas demonstrated patients with geriatric syndromes (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.83), but not frailty defined by CFS were less likely to be assessed within 4 h of arrival. Moderate and severe frailty and the presence of a geriatric syndrome were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving the consultant review standard (moderate, adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.94, severe adjusted OR 0.75 95% CI 0.58-0.96, geriatric syndrome adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.50-0.69).
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Frailty is associated with delayed clinical assessment. This association may suggest a systemic issue with clinical prioritisation, with important implications for acute care policy.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
The database for SAMBA is funded by the Society for Acute Medicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38192597
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102278
pii: S2589-5370(23)00455-8
pmc: PMC10772156
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102278Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_21015
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_21055
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
ES has obtained research grants with the Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK and National Institute for Health and Care Research. ES has conducted consultancy work for Gilead and honoraria from the European Respiratory Society to deliver a conference lecture. DSL is president of the Hospital at Home Society (unpaid position in professional medical society). MH is a co-applicant on successful National Institute for Health and Care Research grants. MH received honoraria for developing an online learning package on the unconscious patient.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
Acute Med. 2020;19(4):209-219
pubmed: 33215174
Acute Med. 2021;20(1):48-67
pubmed: 33749694
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):255-63
pubmed: 15031310
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Nov;22(6):522-524
pubmed: 36427876
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):19
pubmed: 34979956
Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):127-32
pubmed: 24171946
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Dec;11(6):1009-1015
pubmed: 32770462
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 May;55(5):780-91
pubmed: 17493201
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1207
pubmed: 30718784
Clin Med (Lond). 2022 Mar;22(2):131-139
pubmed: 35046012
Age Ageing. 2017 Sep 1;46(5):801-806
pubmed: 28531254
CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95
pubmed: 16129869
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e064910
pubmed: 36526319
Acute Med. 2022;21(1):19-26
pubmed: 35342906
Age Ageing. 2016 Sep;45(5):577-84
pubmed: 27496917
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011 Jun;12(5):337-43
pubmed: 21450180
Can Geriatr J. 2020 Sep 01;23(3):210-215
pubmed: 32904824
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):139
pubmed: 29898673
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jan-Feb;62:97-102
pubmed: 26323650
Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):807-810
pubmed: 32482758
Acute Med. 2013;12(4):214-9
pubmed: 24364052