Computer-aided detection thresholds for digital chest radiography interpretation in tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.
Journal
ERJ open research
ISSN: 2312-0541
Titre abrégé: ERJ Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101671641
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
19
07
2023
accepted:
25
10
2023
medline:
10
1
2024
pubmed:
10
1
2024
entrez:
10
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Use of computer-aided detection (CAD) software is recommended to improve tuberculosis screening and triage, but threshold determination is challenging if reference testing has not been performed in all individuals. We aimed to determine such thresholds through secondary analysis of the 2019 Lesotho national tuberculosis prevalence survey. Symptom screening and chest radiographs were performed in participants aged ≥15 years; those symptomatic or with abnormal chest radiographs provided samples for Xpert MTB/RIF and culture testing. Chest radiographs were processed using CAD4TB version 7. We used six methodological approaches to deal with participants who did not have bacteriological test results to estimate pulmonary tuberculosis prevalence and assess diagnostic accuracy. Among 17 070 participants, 5214 (31%) had their tuberculosis status determined; 142 had tuberculosis. Prevalence estimates varied between methodological approaches (0.83-2.72%). Using multiple imputation to estimate tuberculosis status for those eligible but not tested, and assuming those not eligible for testing were negative, a CAD4TBv7 threshold of 13 had a sensitivity of 89.7% (95% CI 84.6-94.8) and a specificity of 74.2% (73.6-74.9), close to World Health Organization (WHO) target product profile criteria. Assuming all those not tested were negative produced similar results. This is the first study to evaluate CAD4TB in a community screening context employing a range of approaches to account for unknown tuberculosis status. The assumption that those not tested are negative - regardless of testing eligibility status - was robust. As threshold determination must be context specific, our analytically straightforward approach should be adopted to leverage prevalence surveys for CAD threshold determination in other settings with a comparable proportion of eligible but not tested participants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38196890
doi: 10.1183/23120541.00508-2023
pii: 00508-2023
pmc: PMC10772898
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
Copyright ©The authors 2024.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: F. Vanobberghen declares a grant from EDCTP (RIA2018D-2498; TB TRIAGE+). A.K. Keter declares no conflicts of interest. B.K.M. Jacobs declares a grant from EDCTP (RIA2018D-2498; TB TRIAGE+). T.R. Glass declares no conflicts of interest. L. Lynen declares being director and member of the Board of Governors of ITM. I. Law declares no conflicts of interest. K. Murphy declares no conflicts of interest. B. van Ginneken declares grants from EDCTP, royalties from Delft Imaging Systems and Thirona, and stocks in Thirona. I. Ayakaka declares no conflicts of interest. A. van Heerden declares grants from EDCTP, NIH and BMGF. L. Maama declares no conflicts of interest. K. Reither declares a grant from EDCTP (RIA2018D-2498; TB TRIAGE+), a grant from SNSF (CRSII5_213514 Sinergia) and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board (TrENDxTB). The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions or policies of the institutions with which they are affiliated.