Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) to predict mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a prospective study.

Hematologic Neoplasms Immunotherapy Inflammation

Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jan 2024
Historique:
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 10 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We previously reported that the "Endothelial Activation and Stress Index" (EASIX; ((creatinine×lactate dehydrogenase)÷thrombocytes)) measured before start of conditioning predicts mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) when used as continuous score. For broad clinical implementation, a prospectively validated EASIX-pre cut-off is needed that defines a high-risk cohort and is easy to use. In the current study, we first performed a retrospective cohort analysis in n=2022 alloSCT recipients and identified an optimal cut-off for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) as EASIX-pre=3. For cut-off validation, we conducted a multicenter prospective study with inclusion of n=317 first alloSCTs from peripheral blood stem cell in adult patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma or myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation network. Twenty-three % (n=74) of alloSCT recipients had EASIX-pre ≥3 taken before conditioning. NRM at 2 years was 31.1% in the high EASIX group versus 11.5% in the low EASIX group (p<0.001). Patients with high EASIX-pre also had worse 2 years overall survival (51.6% vs 70.9%; p=0.002). We were able to validate the cut-off and found that EASIX ≥3 was associated with more than twofold increased risk for NRM in multivariate analysis (HR=2.18, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.94; p=0.01). No statistically significant difference could be observed for the incidence of relapse. The results of this study provide a prospectively validated standard laboratory biomarker index to estimate the transplant-related mortality risk after alloSCT. EASIX ≥3 taken before conditioning identifies a population of alloSCT recipients who have a more than twofold increased risk of treatment-related mortality.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We previously reported that the "Endothelial Activation and Stress Index" (EASIX; ((creatinine×lactate dehydrogenase)÷thrombocytes)) measured before start of conditioning predicts mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) when used as continuous score. For broad clinical implementation, a prospectively validated EASIX-pre cut-off is needed that defines a high-risk cohort and is easy to use.
METHOD METHODS
In the current study, we first performed a retrospective cohort analysis in n=2022 alloSCT recipients and identified an optimal cut-off for predicting non-relapse mortality (NRM) as EASIX-pre=3. For cut-off validation, we conducted a multicenter prospective study with inclusion of n=317 first alloSCTs from peripheral blood stem cell in adult patients with acute leukemia, lymphoma or myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation network.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-three % (n=74) of alloSCT recipients had EASIX-pre ≥3 taken before conditioning. NRM at 2 years was 31.1% in the high EASIX group versus 11.5% in the low EASIX group (p<0.001). Patients with high EASIX-pre also had worse 2 years overall survival (51.6% vs 70.9%; p=0.002). We were able to validate the cut-off and found that EASIX ≥3 was associated with more than twofold increased risk for NRM in multivariate analysis (HR=2.18, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.94; p=0.01). No statistically significant difference could be observed for the incidence of relapse.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study provide a prospectively validated standard laboratory biomarker index to estimate the transplant-related mortality risk after alloSCT. EASIX ≥3 taken before conditioning identifies a population of alloSCT recipients who have a more than twofold increased risk of treatment-related mortality.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38199608
pii: jitc-2023-007635
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007635
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: OP has received honoraria or travel support from Gilead, Jazz, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Therakos. He has received research support from Incyte and Priothera. He is a member of advisory boards to Equillium Bio, Jazz, Gilead, Novartis, MSD, Omeros, Priothera, Sanofi, Shionogi and SOBI. HS reports having received personal fees from Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Sanofi and from the Belgian Hematological Society (BHS), as well as research grants from Novartis and the BHS, all paid to her institution. She has also received non-financial support from Gilead, the EBMT (European Society for Blood and Marrow transplantation) and the CIBMTR (Center for International Bone Marrow Transplantation Research).

Auteurs

Olaf Penack (O)

Department for Haematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany olaf.penack@charite.de.
EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party, Heidelberg, Germany.

Thomas Luft (T)

Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Christophe Peczynski (C)

EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party, Paris, France.
Department of Haematology, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Axel Benner (A)

German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany.

Simona Sica (S)

Istituto di Ematologia, Universita Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Mutlu Arat (M)

Florence Nightingale Hospital, Hematopoietic SCT Unit, Demiroglu Bilim University Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

Maija Itäla-Remes (M)

Turku University Hospital FI, Turku, Finland.

Lucia López Corral (LL)

Department for Haematology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Salamanca, Spain.

Nicolaas P M Schaap (NPM)

Department of Hematology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Michal Karas (M)

Hospital Dept. of Hematology/Oncology, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

Ludek Raida (L)

Olomouc University Social Health Institute, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Thomas Schroeder (T)

Dept. of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Peter Dreger (P)

Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Elisabetta Metafuni (E)

Istituto di Ematologia, Universita Cattolica S. Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Tulay Ozcelik (T)

Florence Nightingale Hospital, Hematopoietic SCT Unit, Demiroglu Bilim University Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.

Brenda M Sandmaier (BM)

University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Lambros Kordelas (L)

Dept. of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Ivan Moiseev (I)

EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party, Paris, France.
First Pavlov State Medical University of St Petersburg, St Petersburg, Russian Federation.

Hélène Schoemans (H)

EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party, Paris, France.
Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Christian Koenecke (C)

Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Grzegorz W Basak (GW)

EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party, Paris, France.
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, the Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Zinaida Peric (Z)

EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party, Paris, France.
Department of Hematology, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.

Classifications MeSH