What helps patients access web-based services in primary care? Free-text analysis of patient responses to the Di-Facto questionnaire.
Digital divide
Internet use
Primary health care
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Jan 2024
10 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
30
05
2023
accepted:
22
12
2023
medline:
11
1
2024
pubmed:
11
1
2024
entrez:
10
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The National Health Service (NHS) and general practice are increasingly adopting digital services. These services can impact both positively and negatively upon patient experiences, and access to digital services is not equal amongst all groups. Within a wider project examining digital facilitation (the Di-Facto study) our team conducted a patient survey amongst English primary care practices aiming to investigate patient views of what supports uptake and use of web-based services. This paper reports on the analysis of the free-text responses from the patient survey. The Di-Facto patient survey was distributed to practices in eight clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England between 2021-2022. We examined free-text responses to two questions relating to access to primary care web-based and support for web-based services. We used qualitative reflexive thematic analysis based on a six-stage process to analyse responses. Of the 3051 patients who responded to the Di-Facto survey, 2246 provided a free-text response. We present our findings in two major themes: systems and structures and their impact on use of web-based services, and 'what works for me', a description of how respondents described what worked, or did not work in terms of their interactions with web-based services. Respondents described how the technology, such as poor practice website design, confusion over multiple digital apps, data security and concerns about eConsultation offerings impacted on use of web-based services. Respondents described practice level barriers, such as a lack of or inconsistent provision, which prevented optimal use of web-based services. Respondents described personal and technical barriers that impacted on their use of digital services, and described which web-based services worked well for them. Respondents felt that web-based services were not a replacement for face-to-face interactions with a doctor. This analysis of free-text responses from a large patient survey highlights the system, practice, and person level barriers and facilitators to use of digital services in primary care. With an increasing push towards digital solutions in NHS primary care, practices should consider the design, rollout and communication of their web-based services to support patient access.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The National Health Service (NHS) and general practice are increasingly adopting digital services. These services can impact both positively and negatively upon patient experiences, and access to digital services is not equal amongst all groups. Within a wider project examining digital facilitation (the Di-Facto study) our team conducted a patient survey amongst English primary care practices aiming to investigate patient views of what supports uptake and use of web-based services. This paper reports on the analysis of the free-text responses from the patient survey.
METHODS
METHODS
The Di-Facto patient survey was distributed to practices in eight clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England between 2021-2022. We examined free-text responses to two questions relating to access to primary care web-based and support for web-based services. We used qualitative reflexive thematic analysis based on a six-stage process to analyse responses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of the 3051 patients who responded to the Di-Facto survey, 2246 provided a free-text response. We present our findings in two major themes: systems and structures and their impact on use of web-based services, and 'what works for me', a description of how respondents described what worked, or did not work in terms of their interactions with web-based services. Respondents described how the technology, such as poor practice website design, confusion over multiple digital apps, data security and concerns about eConsultation offerings impacted on use of web-based services. Respondents described practice level barriers, such as a lack of or inconsistent provision, which prevented optimal use of web-based services. Respondents described personal and technical barriers that impacted on their use of digital services, and described which web-based services worked well for them. Respondents felt that web-based services were not a replacement for face-to-face interactions with a doctor.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This analysis of free-text responses from a large patient survey highlights the system, practice, and person level barriers and facilitators to use of digital services in primary care. With an increasing push towards digital solutions in NHS primary care, practices should consider the design, rollout and communication of their web-based services to support patient access.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38200431
doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02257-5
pii: 10.1186/s12875-023-02257-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20Subventions
Organisme : National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research Programme
ID : 128268
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
NHS. The NHS long term plan. 2019. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ .
NHS England. Delivery plan for recovering access to primary care. 2023. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/delivery-plan-for-recovering-access-to-primary-care/ .
Hutchings R. The impact of Covid-19 on the use of digital technology in the NHS. London: Nuffield Trust; 2020. Contract No.: ISBN:978-1-910953-83-9.
Atherton H, Ziebland S. What do we need to consider when planning, implementing and researching the use of alternatives to face-to-face consultations in primary healthcare? Digit Health. 2016;2:2055207616675559.
pubmed: 29942570
pmcid: 6001190
Atherton H. Digitally enabled primary care: the emperor’s new clothes? Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(686):420–1.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705125
pubmed: 31467000
pmcid: 6715471
Gomez-Cano M, Atherton H, Campbell J, Eccles A, Dale J, Poltawski L, et al. Awareness and use of online appointment booking in general practice: analysis of GP Patient Survey data. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(suppl 1):bjgp20X711365.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X711365
pubmed: 32554662
Di-Facto: Digital facilitation in primary care. 2023. Available from: https://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/di-facto/ .
Abel GA, Sussex H, Akter J, Aminu N, Bak A, Bryce W, Clark C, Cockcroft C, Evans E, Gkousis H, Jenkins E, Jenkinson G, Khan C, Lambert N, Leach J, Marriott B, Newbould C, Parkinson J, Parsons S, Pitchforth J, Sheard E, Stockwell L, Thomas S, Treadgold C, Winder B, Campbell R. J. Facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services - current experience and future potential: the Di-Facto study, in press. 2023.
Leach B, Parkinson S, Gkousis E, Abel G, Atherton H, Campbell J, et al. Digital facilitation to support patient access to web-based primary care services: scoping literature review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(7):e33911.
doi: 10.2196/33911
pubmed: 35834301
pmcid: 9335178
Improving inclusion of under-served groups in clinical research. 2022. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/improving-inclusion-of-under-served-groups-in-clinical-research-guidance-from-include-project/25435 .
Braun V, CV, Hayfield N, Terry G. Answers to frequently asked questions about thematic analysis. 2019. Available from: https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/documents/Answers%20to%20frequently%20asked%20questions%20about%20thematic%20analysis%20April%202019.pdf .
Braun VC. V. using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Slevin P, Kessie T, Cullen J, Butler MW, Donnelly SC, Caulfield B. Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions. QJM. 2020;113(3):163–72.
pubmed: 31545374
Shaw EK, Howard J, West DR, Crabtree BF, Nease DE Jr, Tutt B, et al. The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP). J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):676–85.
doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.110281
pubmed: 22956703
pmcid: 3535479
Rughani G, Hanlon P, Corcoran N, Mair FS. The readability of general practice websites: a cross-sectional analysis of all general practice websites in Scotland. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(706):e391–8.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0820
pubmed: 33824159
pmcid: 8049218
Eccles A, Hopper M, Turk A, Atherton H. Patient use of an online triage platform: a mixed-methods retrospective exploration in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(682):e336–44.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702197
pubmed: 30910874
pmcid: 6478479
Turner A, Morris R, Rakhra D, Stevenson F, McDonagh L, Hamilton F, et al. Unintended consequences of online consultations: a qualitative study in UK primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2022;72(715):e128–37.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0426
pubmed: 34903520
Bauerly BC, McCord RF, Hulkower R, Pepin D. Broadband access as a public health issue: the role of law in expanding broadband access and connecting underserved communities for better health outcomes. J Law Med Ethics. 2019;47(2suppl):39–42.
doi: 10.1177/1073110519857314
pubmed: 31298126
Cox J. Rural Social Exclusion. In: Cox J, Clark CE, Sanders T, editors. Rural Healthcare. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. p. 215–29.
doi: 10.1201/9781003302438-21
Neve G, Fyfe M, Hayhoe B, Kumar S. Digital health in primary care: risks and recommendations. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70(701):609–10.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713837
pubmed: 33243917
pmcid: 7707039
Mold F, de Lusignan S, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Wyatt JC, Quinn T, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic review in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(632):e141-151.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X683941
pubmed: 25733435
pmcid: 4337302
Garcia JE, Reshaw J. Is there anything else you would like to tell us’ - methodological issues in the use of free-text comments from postal surveys. Qual Quant. 2004;38:113–25.
doi: 10.1023/B:QUQU.0000019394.78970.df
Murphy M, Scott LJ, Salisbury C, Turner A, Scott A, Denholm R, et al. Implementation of remote consulting in UK primary care following the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods longitudinal study. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(704):e166–77.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0948
pubmed: 33558332
pmcid: 7909923
Advice on how to establish a remote ‘total triage’ model in general practice using online consultations: NHS England; 2020. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/coronavirus/wp-content/uploads/sites/52/2020/03/C0098-total-triage-blueprint-september-2020-v3.pdf .
Atherton H, Lasserson D. Technology. In: Cox J, Clark CE, Sanders T, editors. Rural Healthcare. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. p. 184–99.
doi: 10.1201/9781003302438-19
Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. Telemedicine 2020 and the next decade. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):859.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30424-4
pubmed: 32171399
Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs. Rural proofing in England 2020: delivering policy in a rural context. 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/608aac40e90e076aaaa26edf/Rural_Proofing_Report_2020.pdf .