Outlook for 615 Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Recurrence Risk after Surgery and Disease-Specific Survival in Advanced Disease.

prognosis recurrence small intestinal neuroendocrine tumor survival

Journal

Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 27 10 2023
revised: 08 12 2023
accepted: 28 12 2023
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNET) are one of the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment. We utilized a single-center study including consecutive patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 and followed them until death or the end of study. Disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigated by Cox regression analyses with the inclusion of prognostic factors. Aims/primary outcomes: We identified three groups: (1) disease specific-survival in the total cohort (group1), (2) RFS and disease-specific survival after intended radical surgery (group2), (3) disease specific-survival in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumor after primary resection (group3). In total, 615 patients, with a mean age (SD) 65 ± 11 years were included. Median (IQR) Ki-67 index was 4 (2-7)%. Median disease-specific survival in group1 was 130 months. Median RFS in group2 was 138 months with 5- and 10-year RFS rates of 72% and 59% with age, plasma chromogranin A (p-CgA) and Ki-67 index as prognostic factors. The ten year disease-specific survival rate in group2 was 86%. The median disease-specific survival in group3 was 85 months with age, Ki-67 index, p-CgA and primary tumor resection as prognostic factors. When proliferation was expressed by WHO grade, no difference was observed between G1 vs. G2 for any of the primary outcomes. Recurrence rates remained high 5-10 years after surgery (group2) supporting long-term follow-up. Median disease-specific survival in patient with unresectable disease (group3) was 7 years, with a favorable impact of primary tumor resection. Our data does not support the current grading system since no significant prognostic information was detected in G1 vs. G2 tumors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNET) are one of the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment.
METHOD METHODS
We utilized a single-center study including consecutive patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 and followed them until death or the end of study. Disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigated by Cox regression analyses with the inclusion of prognostic factors. Aims/primary outcomes: We identified three groups: (1) disease specific-survival in the total cohort (group1), (2) RFS and disease-specific survival after intended radical surgery (group2), (3) disease specific-survival in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumor after primary resection (group3).
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 615 patients, with a mean age (SD) 65 ± 11 years were included. Median (IQR) Ki-67 index was 4 (2-7)%. Median disease-specific survival in group1 was 130 months. Median RFS in group2 was 138 months with 5- and 10-year RFS rates of 72% and 59% with age, plasma chromogranin A (p-CgA) and Ki-67 index as prognostic factors. The ten year disease-specific survival rate in group2 was 86%. The median disease-specific survival in group3 was 85 months with age, Ki-67 index, p-CgA and primary tumor resection as prognostic factors. When proliferation was expressed by WHO grade, no difference was observed between G1 vs. G2 for any of the primary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Recurrence rates remained high 5-10 years after surgery (group2) supporting long-term follow-up. Median disease-specific survival in patient with unresectable disease (group3) was 7 years, with a favorable impact of primary tumor resection. Our data does not support the current grading system since no significant prognostic information was detected in G1 vs. G2 tumors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38201631
pii: cancers16010204
doi: 10.3390/cancers16010204
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Cecilie Slott (C)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Seppo W Langer (SW)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Stine Møller (S)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Jesper Krogh (J)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Marianne Klose (M)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Carsten Palnæs Hansen (CP)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Andreas Kjaer (A)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine & Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Pernille Holmager (P)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Rajendra Singh Garbyal (RS)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Ulrich Knigge (U)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Mikkel Andreassen (M)

ENETS Center of Excellence, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH