Anatomical and Functional Outcomes with Prompt versus Delayed Initiation of Anti-VEGF in Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

anti-VEGF bevacizumab central subfield macular thickness exudative age-related macular degeneration intravitreal treatment treatment-naïve

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 20 09 2023
revised: 15 12 2023
accepted: 17 12 2023
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To investigate the correlation between time from diagnosis of treatment-naïve exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to the introduction of anti-VEGF treatment and anatomical and functional outcomes. Retrospective cohort study. Included were treatment-naïve exudative AMD patients who presented to a single tertiary medical center between 2012 and 2018. All patients were treated within the first 30 days of their diagnosis with three monthly intravitreal injections of bevacizumab. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (prompt anti-VEGF) were injected with bevacizumab within ten days, group 2 (intermediate anti-VEGF) within 11-20 days, and group 3 (delayed anti-VEGF) within 21-30 days from diagnosis. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared up to two years from treatment. 146 eyes of 146 patients were included. Sixty-eight patients were in the prompt anti-VEGF group, 31 in the intermediate anti-VEGF group, and 47 in the delayed anti-VEGF group. Following the induction phase of three intravitreal bevacizumab injections, the mean central subfield macular thickness (328.0 ± 115.4 µm vs. 364.6 ± 127.2 µm vs. 337.7 ± 150.1 µm, Our real-world evidence data emphasize that even if anti-VEGF induction cannot be initiated promptly within ten days from diagnosis of naïve exudative AMD, the visual and anatomical prognosis of the patients may not worsen if the treatment is started within one month of diagnosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38202118
pii: jcm13010111
doi: 10.3390/jcm13010111
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Assaf Gershoni (A)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Edward Barayev (E)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Rabeea H Daood (RH)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.

Maureen Yogev (M)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.

Orly Gal-Or (O)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Olga Reitblat (O)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Maria Tsessler (M)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.

Michal Schaap Fogler (M)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Raimo Tuuminen (R)

Helsinki Retina Research Group, University of Helsinki, 00170 Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Ophthalmology, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, Kotkantie 41, 48210 Kotka, Finland.

Rita Ehrlich (R)

Ophthalmology Division, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva 49414, Israel.
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Classifications MeSH