Exercise Systolic Blood Pressure Response During Cycle Ergometry is Associated with Future Hypertension in Normotensive Individuals.

Cardiovascular disease Epidemiology Exercise capacity Exercise physiology Reference values SBP/Watt slope

Journal

European journal of preventive cardiology
ISSN: 2047-4881
Titre abrégé: Eur J Prev Cardiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101564430

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 01 09 2023
revised: 22 12 2023
accepted: 08 01 2024
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We aimed to investigate the association between the exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) response and future hypertension (HTN) in normotensive individuals referred for cycle ergometry, with special regard to reference exercise SBP values, and exercise capacity. In this longitudinal cohort study, data from 14,428 exercise tests were cross-linked with Swedish national registries on diagnoses and medications. We excluded individuals with a baseline diagnosis of cardiovascular disease or HTN. The peak exercise SBP (SBPpeak) was recorded and compared to the upper limit of normal (ULN) derived from SBPpeak reference equations incorporating age, sex, resting SBP and exercise capacity. To evaluate the impact of exercise capacity, three SBP to work rate slopes (SBP/W-slopes), were calculated, relative to either supine or seated SBP at rest or to the first exercise SBP. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRadjusted [95% Confidence interval, CI]) for incident HTN during follow-up, in relation to SBP response metrics, were calculated. We included 3,895 normotensive individuals (49±14 years, 45% females) with maximal cycle ergometer tests. During follow-up (median 7.5 years) 22% developed HTN. Higher SBPpeak and SBPpeak>ULN were associated with incident HTN (HRadjusted 1.19 [1.14-1.23] per 10 mmHg, and 1.95 [1.54-2.47], respectively). All three SBP/W-slopes were positively associated to incident HTN, particularly the SBP/W-slope calculated as supine-to-peak SBP (HRadjusted 1.25 [1.19-1.31] per 1 mmHg/10W). Both SBPpeak>ULN based on reference values and high SBP/W-slopes were associated with incident HTN in normotensive individuals and should be considered in the evaluation of the cycle ergometry SBP response. We examined the systolic blood pressure response during maximal bicycle exercise testing in individuals without hypertension or established cardiovascular disease, and found that: When applying reference values for peak systolic blood pressure during cycling exercise, accounting for age, sex, resting blood pressure and exercise capacity, exceeding the upper limit of normal was associated with twice as high relative risk of future hypertension, compared to having a peak systolic blood pressure within normal limits. A steep increase in exercise blood pressure in relation to the increase in work rate was also associated with future hypertension but did not always coincide with elevated peak systolic blood pressure.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
We examined the systolic blood pressure response during maximal bicycle exercise testing in individuals without hypertension or established cardiovascular disease, and found that: When applying reference values for peak systolic blood pressure during cycling exercise, accounting for age, sex, resting blood pressure and exercise capacity, exceeding the upper limit of normal was associated with twice as high relative risk of future hypertension, compared to having a peak systolic blood pressure within normal limits. A steep increase in exercise blood pressure in relation to the increase in work rate was also associated with future hypertension but did not always coincide with elevated peak systolic blood pressure.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38204381
pii: 7514712
doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae012
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Auteurs

Anna Carlén (A)

Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Thomas Lindow (T)

Department of Clinical Physiology, Växjö Central Hospital, Clinical Sciences, Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Department of Research and Development, Region Kronoberg, Sweden.

Nicholas Cauwenberghs (N)

Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven, Belgium.

Viktor Elmberg (V)

Department of Clinical Physiology, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.

Lars Brudin (L)

Department of Clinical Physiology, Kalmar County Hospital, Kalmar, Sweden.

Magnus Ekström (M)

Lund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund, Sweden.

Kristofer Hedman (K)

Department of Clinical Physiology in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH