Does subtyping of high-grade pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas have an impact on therapy selection?

MYC proteins Small cell carcinoma aurora kinase A (AURKA) fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma

Journal

Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 03 08 2023
accepted: 14 12 2023
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are characterized by a rapid progressive course. Therapy for SCLC has not much changed for decades, and in LCNEC controversies exist, favoring either SCLC-like or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-like therapy. Three subtypes of SCLC identified in cell cultures, namely ASCL1, NeuroD1, and POU2F3 have been confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The fourth type based on the expression of YAP1 was questioned, and another type, inflamed SCLC, was proposed. SCLC and LCNEC samples were investigated by immunohistochemistry for different subtypes. Additionally, immunohistochemical markers as potential tools to identify patients who might respond to targeted treatment were investigated. For validation a biopsy set was added. ASCL1, NeuroD1, and POU2F3 were expressed in different percentages in SCLC and LCNEC. Similar percentages of expression were found in biopsies. ATOH was expressed in combination with one of the subtypes. YAP1 and TAZ were expressed in some SCLC and LCNEC cases. HES1 expression was seen in few cases. Predominantly stroma cells expressed programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The dominant MYC protein was N-MYC. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) was expressed in the majority of both carcinomas, whereas fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in few. SCLC and LCNEC can be subtyped into ASCL1-, NeuroD1-, and POU2F3-positive types. AURKA expression and positivity for N-MYC protein was not associated with subtypes. AURKA and FGFR2 are both possible targets for inhibition in SCLC and LCNEC, but patients' selection should be based on expression of the enzyme. Combined chemo- and immunotherapy might be decided by PD-L1 staining of stroma cells.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNEC) are characterized by a rapid progressive course. Therapy for SCLC has not much changed for decades, and in LCNEC controversies exist, favoring either SCLC-like or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-like therapy. Three subtypes of SCLC identified in cell cultures, namely ASCL1, NeuroD1, and POU2F3 have been confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The fourth type based on the expression of YAP1 was questioned, and another type, inflamed SCLC, was proposed.
Methods UNASSIGNED
SCLC and LCNEC samples were investigated by immunohistochemistry for different subtypes. Additionally, immunohistochemical markers as potential tools to identify patients who might respond to targeted treatment were investigated. For validation a biopsy set was added.
Results UNASSIGNED
ASCL1, NeuroD1, and POU2F3 were expressed in different percentages in SCLC and LCNEC. Similar percentages of expression were found in biopsies. ATOH was expressed in combination with one of the subtypes. YAP1 and TAZ were expressed in some SCLC and LCNEC cases. HES1 expression was seen in few cases. Predominantly stroma cells expressed programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). The dominant MYC protein was N-MYC. Aurora kinase A (AURKA) was expressed in the majority of both carcinomas, whereas fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) in few.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
SCLC and LCNEC can be subtyped into ASCL1-, NeuroD1-, and POU2F3-positive types. AURKA expression and positivity for N-MYC protein was not associated with subtypes. AURKA and FGFR2 are both possible targets for inhibition in SCLC and LCNEC, but patients' selection should be based on expression of the enzyme. Combined chemo- and immunotherapy might be decided by PD-L1 staining of stroma cells.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38205203
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-505
pii: tlcr-12-12-2412
pmc: PMC10775006
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2412-2426

Informations de copyright

2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-23-505/coif). H.P. has received unrestricted grant for a cell culture matrix printing device from Astra Zeneca, Hoffmann La Roche; support from attending advisary board meeting of AstraZeneca and is a member of Committee for the preparation of WCLC Vienna of IASLC. L.B. received grants from Takeda, AstraZeneca, BMS and Roche; he also received payment for lectures and participated in advisory boards form Invitae, Eli-Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Janssen; support for attending meeting from Pfizer and MSD. He is Int. Secretary-Austrian Society of Pathology; PPS Membership and Awards Committee; Member of the Mesothelioma Committee of IASLC. The other author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Helmut Popper (H)

D&F Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Luka Brcic (L)

D&F Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Sylvia Eidenhammer (S)

D&F Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Classifications MeSH