Cathepsin detection to identify malignant cells during robotic pulmonary resection.
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS)
cathepsin
intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI)
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
received:
06
06
2023
accepted:
25
10
2023
medline:
11
1
2024
pubmed:
11
1
2024
entrez:
11
1
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) uses a fluorescent probe to identify occult cancers. VGT-309 is a quenched activity-based probe that is activated in the presence of cathepsins, enzymes overexpressed in cancer cells, and detected by near-infrared (NIR) light. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with intraoperative molecular imaging (RIMI) using VGT-309 to localize tumors using NIR light to detect areas with increased cathepsin activity. Our secondary outcome was to compare RIMI to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with intraoperative molecular imaging (VIMI). In a phase 2 clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania, patients (n=10) with suspicious pulmonary lesions underwent RATS. First, white light was used followed by RIMI to identify tissues with increased cathepsin activity. Then, VIMI was performed to compare the sensitivity and PPV in identifying the cathepsin activity. The resected specimens were then evaluated for fluorescence and underwent histopathological analysis for cathepsin expression. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant. RATS with white light identified 6 out of the 10 pulmonary nodules, whereas adding RIMI identified an additional 4 more pulmonary nodules. RIMI and VIMI were able to detect the same 8/10 (80%) nodules. The addition of VIMI did not identify any lesions that RIMI may have missed. The mean fluorescence intensity of tumors visualized by RIMI was 115.81 A.U. [standard deviation (SD) =58.57] compared to 95.6 A.U. (SD =14.81) by VIMI (P=0.41). The mean tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of tumors visualized by RIMI was 9.20 (SD =9.12) compared to 2.29 A.U. (SD =1.11) using VIMI (P=0.1). The sensitivity of RIMI and VIMI was 88.9% which was superior to that of RATS (55.6%). The PPV of RATS was 83.3% compared to 100% in RIMI and VIMI. RIMI is a valuable option for visualization of occult disease using VGT-309-guided IMI through identifying areas of increased cathepsin activity. In this small series, RIMI and VIMI showed clinical equivalence in sensitivity and PPV of detecting cathepsin activity.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Intraoperative molecular imaging (IMI) uses a fluorescent probe to identify occult cancers. VGT-309 is a quenched activity-based probe that is activated in the presence of cathepsins, enzymes overexpressed in cancer cells, and detected by near-infrared (NIR) light. This study aims to evaluate the sensitivity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) with intraoperative molecular imaging (RIMI) using VGT-309 to localize tumors using NIR light to detect areas with increased cathepsin activity. Our secondary outcome was to compare RIMI to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with intraoperative molecular imaging (VIMI).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In a phase 2 clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania, patients (n=10) with suspicious pulmonary lesions underwent RATS. First, white light was used followed by RIMI to identify tissues with increased cathepsin activity. Then, VIMI was performed to compare the sensitivity and PPV in identifying the cathepsin activity. The resected specimens were then evaluated for fluorescence and underwent histopathological analysis for cathepsin expression. Image analysis was performed using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics software. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.
Results
UNASSIGNED
RATS with white light identified 6 out of the 10 pulmonary nodules, whereas adding RIMI identified an additional 4 more pulmonary nodules. RIMI and VIMI were able to detect the same 8/10 (80%) nodules. The addition of VIMI did not identify any lesions that RIMI may have missed. The mean fluorescence intensity of tumors visualized by RIMI was 115.81 A.U. [standard deviation (SD) =58.57] compared to 95.6 A.U. (SD =14.81) by VIMI (P=0.41). The mean tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of tumors visualized by RIMI was 9.20 (SD =9.12) compared to 2.29 A.U. (SD =1.11) using VIMI (P=0.1). The sensitivity of RIMI and VIMI was 88.9% which was superior to that of RATS (55.6%). The PPV of RATS was 83.3% compared to 100% in RIMI and VIMI.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
RIMI is a valuable option for visualization of occult disease using VGT-309-guided IMI through identifying areas of increased cathepsin activity. In this small series, RIMI and VIMI showed clinical equivalence in sensitivity and PPV of detecting cathepsin activity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38205214
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-370
pii: tlcr-12-12-2370
pmc: PMC10775009
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2370-2380Informations de copyright
2023 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tlcr.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tlcr-23-370/coif). J.T.S. Jr and E.S.B. report that they receive salary and stock options as full-time employees of the company. The company also provided study drug (VGT-309) and funding for the clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania where the data in the manuscript were generated. Vergent Bioscience is the awardee of SBIR grant R44CA277890, which supports the clinical trial at the University of Pennsylvania where the data in the manuscript were generated. As employees of the company, Vergent pays expenses for J.T.S. Jr and E.S.B. to travel to and attend scientific meetings. They are inventor on a pending patent application owned by Vergent. As employees of the company, they have stock options in the company. They are executives of the company and receives a salary as a full-time employee. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.