Posterolateral or Direct Lateral Surgical Approach for Hemiarthroplasty After a Hip Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Trial Alongside a Natural Experiment.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 11 1 2024
pubmed: 11 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hip fractures in older adults are serious injuries that result in disability, higher rates of illness and death, and a substantial strain on health care resources. High-quality evidence to improve hip fracture care regarding the surgical approach of hemiarthroplasty is lacking. To compare 6-month outcomes of the posterolateral approach (PLA) and direct lateral approach (DLA) for hemiarthroplasty in patients with acute femoral neck fracture. This multicenter, randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing DLA and PLA was performed alongside a natural experiment (NE) at 14 centers in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18 years or older with an acute femoral neck fracture were included, with or without dementia. Secondary surgery of the hip, pathological fractures, or patients with multitrauma were excluded. Recruitment took place between February 2018 and January 2022. Treatment allocation was random or pseudorandom based on geographical location and surgeon preference. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2022 to September 2022. Hemiarthroplasty using PLA or DLA. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life 6 months after surgery, quantified with the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Secondary outcomes included dislocations, fear of falling and falls, activities of daily living, pain, and reoperations. To improve generalizability, a novel technique was used for data fusion of the RCT and NE. A total of 843 patients (542 [64.3%] female; mean [SD] age, 82.2 [7.5] years) participated, with 555 patients in the RCT (283 patients in the DLA group; 272 patients in the PLA group) and 288 patients in the NE (172 patients in the DLA group; 116 patients in the PLA group). In the RCT, mean EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 6 months were 0.50 (95% CI, 0.45-0.55) after DLA and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.44-0.54) after PLA, with 77% completeness. The between-group difference (-0.04 [95% CI, -0.11 to 0.04]) was not statistically significant nor clinically meaningful. Most secondary outcomes were comparable between groups, but PLA was associated with more dislocations than DLA (RCT: 15 of 272 patients [5.5%] in PLA vs 1 of 283 patients [0.4%] in DLA; NE: 6 of 113 patients [5.3%]) in PLA vs 2 of 175 patients [1.1%] in DLA). Data fusion resulted in an effect size of 0.00 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05) for the EQ-5D-5L and an odds ratio of 12.31 (95% CI, 2.77 to 54.70) for experiencing a dislocation after PLA. This combined RCT and NE found that among patients treated with a cemented hemiarthroplasty after an acute femoral neck fracture, PLA was not associated with a better quality of life than DLA. Rates of dislocation and reoperation were higher after PLA. Randomized and pseudorandomized data yielded similar outcomes, which suggests a strengthening of these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04438226.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38206628
pii: 2813843
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.50765
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04438226']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2350765

Investigateurs

Frank van Roon (F)
Martijn van Dijk (M)
Jort Keizer (J)
Anne J H Vochteloo (AJH)
Pieter Joosse (P)
Bert Boonen (B)
Jetse Jelsma (J)
Dieuwertje Theeuwen (D)
Joris J W Ploegmakers (JJW)
Tim Schepers (T)
Evelien van der Meij (E)
Svenhjalmar H van Helden (SH)
Rutger Zuurmond (R)
Bart A van Dijkman (BA)
Thomas D Berendes (TD)
Hans G E Hendriks (HGE)

Auteurs

Maria C J M Tol (MCJM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Nienke W Willigenburg (NW)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Ariena J Rasker (AJ)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Hanna C Willems (HC)

Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Taco Gosens (T)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, ETZ, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Martin J Heetveld (MJ)

Department of Trauma Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.

Martijn G M Schotanus (MGM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery & Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, Sittard-Geleen, the Netherlands.
School of Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.

Bart Eggen (B)

Delft University of Technology, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.

Mate Kormos (M)

Delft University of Technology, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.

Stéphanie L van der Pas (SL)

Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Aad W van der Vaart (AW)

Delft University of Technology, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft, the Netherlands.

J Carel Goslings (JC)

Department of Trauma Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Rudolf W Poolman (RW)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Joint Research, OLVG Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH