[Obstetrical and neonatal prognosis of patients with a history of female genital mutilation].

Pronostic obstétrical et néonatal des patientes ayant un antécédent de mutilation génitale féminine.
excision female genital mutilation infibulation prognosis

Journal

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie
ISSN: 2468-7189
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101693805

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 25 09 2023
revised: 01 01 2024
accepted: 02 01 2024
medline: 12 1 2024
pubmed: 12 1 2024
entrez: 11 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Female genital mutilation (FGM) covers all procedures involving partial or total removal of the external genitalia for non-therapeutic purposes. The period of pregnancy and childbirth is probably more at risk of complications for these women. The main aim of this study was to compare obstetrical, maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a history of female genital mutilation with patients without such a history. All deliveries taking place between January 2005 and June 2022 at Besançon University Hospital in patients with a history of FGM were included. This group was compared with a randomly selected group of deliveries of patients with no history of FGM. A total of 87 deliveries with a history of FGM were included and compared with 696 deliveries with no history of FGM. There were significantly more instrumental deliveries (27.6% vs. 17.5%, p=0.01), more caesarean sections (23% vs. 14.1%, p=0.01), more episiotomies (9.2% vs. 0.7%, p<0.01), more first-degree perineal tears (30.8% vs. 20.8%, p=0.02), second-degree (13.9% vs. 5.3%, p<0, 01), third-degree (3.1% vs. 0.2%, p=0.02), more anterior perineal tears (23.1% vs. 2.5%, p<0.01), increased duration of pushing efforts (13 mins vs. 10 mins, p=0.05) and greater blood loss (297 cc vs. 165 cc, p<0.01) in the group with a history of FGM. There was no statistically significant difference in neonatal outcome. The obstetrical prognosis of patients with a history of FGM is significantly poorer. Neonatal prognosis remains unchanged.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38211770
pii: S2468-7189(24)00006-0
doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.01.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

English Abstract Journal Article

Langues

fre

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Sarah Selides (S)

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France. Electronic address: sselides@chu-besancon.fr.

Camille Nallet (C)

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.

Manon Vouga (M)

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.

Nicolas Mottet (N)

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.

Rajeev Ramanah (R)

Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Jean-Minjoz, 3, boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.

Classifications MeSH