Comparing efficacy and safety of upfront treatment strategies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis.

This article is based on our previous research, which was presented as a post at the Congress Aiom 2022 Congress and published in A thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 01, 2000 and April 01, 2022, and included trials that investigated upfront treatments for this molecular subgroup and reported overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher (grade ≥ 3 AEs). The analysis included 9 RCTs with 2,443 patients receiving eight different treatments: alectinib (at two different dosages), brigatinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, ensartinib, lorlatinib, and chemotherapy. Second and third-generation TKIs significantly prolonged PFS compared to crizotinib, with lorlatinib having the highest probability of yielding the most favorable PFS, followed by alectinib (300 mg or 600 mg). However, only alectinib has been shown to significantly prolong OS compared to crizotinib to date. Lorlatinib appears superior in reducing the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression, followed by alectinib 600 mg. Ceritinib had the highest rate of AEs, followed by lorlatinib and brigatinib. Based on the network meta-analysis, alectinib and lorlatinib emerged as the most promising upfront treatment options. These treatments provide prolonged disease control while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Raffaele Giusti declared financial interests with Roche (expert testimony, personal, advisory board for clinician’s expertise on drug management); Molteni (writing engagement, personal, publication fee for open access manuscript); Novartis (advisory board, personal); Angelini Pharma (invited speaker, personal, invited speaker to national and international congress); Pfizer (advisory board, personal) and Takeda (expert testimony, personal, expert testimony on drug management). Giovanni Scambia has served as consultant for TESARO Bio Italy S.r.l and Johnson & Johnson. He received onoraria from Clovis Oncology Italy S.r.l, and institutional research funding from MSD Italy S.r.l. Gennaro Daniele has served on advisory board of Beigene and received support for travel and accomodation from Roche. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.