Development of assays for the characterization of sperm motility parameters, viability, and membrane integrity in the epididymis and vas deferens of the greater rhea (

avian sperm bird semen ratites sperm pathways wildlife

Journal

Animal reproduction
ISSN: 1984-3143
Titre abrégé: Anim Reprod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101272804

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 14 07 2023
accepted: 06 12 2023
medline: 12 1 2024
pubmed: 12 1 2024
entrez: 12 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The objectives of the study were to (1) describe the kinematic parameters of spermatozoa (2) compare methods of evaluating sperm viability (3) validate assays of functionality and integrity of the sperm membrane and (4) evaluate possible changes between spermatozoa from the epididymis and the vas deferens of the greater rhea. Semen samples were recovered from 7 adult individuals. Sperm motility was characterized by adjusting the set-up for Computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) to that new species. For sperm viability evaluation, smears of bromophenol blue and eosin-nigrosine dyes were used. Five solutions of different osmolarities were then tested for the hypoosmotic swelling test (HOST). The combination of fluorescent probes (propidium iodide - IP and Hoechst 33342) was also used to assess plasma membrane integrity. Data were presented as mean ± SEM. Rhea spermatozoa from the vas deferens had an overall motility of 14.6 ± 2.5%. The bromophenol blue staining technique revealed that 64.6 ± 5.2% sperm were viable, while that proportion was 72.1 ± 2.5% using eosin-nigrosine. An average of 77.6 ± 4.8% of spermatozoa reacted to the HOST with distilled water at 0 mOsm/l. Fluorescent probes indicated that 65.3 ± 2.6% of spermatozoa had intact membranes. Interestingly, no statistical differences were observed between the parameters analyzed in the epididymal spermatozoa and the vas deferens. These new assays set reference values that can now be used to further exploration of sperm handling conditions and freezing protocols in rheas.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38213765
doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2023-0113
pii: arAO20230113_EN
pmc: PMC10782801
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e20230113

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Luana Grasiele Pereira Bezerra (LGP)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Andréia Maria Silva (AM)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Maiko Roberto Tavares Dantas (MRT)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Romário Parente Dos Santos (RP)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Samara Sandy Jeronimo Moreira (SSJ)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Ana Glória Pereira (AG)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Moacir Franco de Oliveira (MF)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Pierre Comizzoli (P)

Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, USA.

Alexandre Rodrigues Silva (AR)

Laboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Department of Animal Sciences, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Classifications MeSH