Glycine Receptor β-Targeting Autoantibodies Contribute to the Pathology of Autoimmune Diseases.
Journal
Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation
ISSN: 2332-7812
Titre abrégé: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101636388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
medline:
12
1
2024
pubmed:
12
1
2024
entrez:
12
1
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stiff-person syndrome (SPS) and progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus (PERM) are rare neurologic disorders of the CNS. Until now, exclusive GlyRα subunit-binding autoantibodies with subsequent changes in function and surface numbers were reported. GlyR autoantibodies have also been described in patients with focal epilepsy. Autoimmune reactivity against the GlyRβ subunits has not yet been shown. Autoantibodies against GlyRα1 target the large extracellular N-terminal domain. This domain shares a high degree of sequence homology with GlyRβ making it not unlikely that GlyRβ-specific autoantibody (aAb) exist and contribute to the disease pathology. In this study, we investigated serum samples from 58 patients for aAb specifically detecting GlyRβ. Studies in microarray format, cell-based assays, and primary spinal cord neurons and spinal cord tissue immunohistochemistry were performed to determine specific GlyRβ binding and define aAb binding to distinct protein regions. Preadsorption approaches of aAbs using living cells and the purified extracellular receptor domain were further used. Finally, functional consequences for inhibitory neurotransmission upon GlyRβ aAb binding were resolved by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. Among 58 samples investigated, cell-based assays, tissue analysis, and preadsorption approaches revealed 2 patients with high specificity for GlyRβ aAb. Quantitative protein cluster analysis demonstrated aAb binding to synaptic GlyRβ colocalized with the scaffold protein gephyrin independent of the presence of GlyRα1. At the functional level, binding of GlyRβ aAb from both patients to its target impair glycine efficacy. Our study establishes GlyRβ as novel target of aAb in patients with SPS/PERM. In contrast to exclusively GlyRα1-positive sera, which alter glycine potency, aAbs against GlyRβ impair receptor efficacy for the neurotransmitter glycine. Imaging and functional analyses showed that GlyRβ aAbs antagonize inhibitory neurotransmission by affecting receptor function rather than localization.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
Stiff-person syndrome (SPS) and progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus (PERM) are rare neurologic disorders of the CNS. Until now, exclusive GlyRα subunit-binding autoantibodies with subsequent changes in function and surface numbers were reported. GlyR autoantibodies have also been described in patients with focal epilepsy. Autoimmune reactivity against the GlyRβ subunits has not yet been shown. Autoantibodies against GlyRα1 target the large extracellular N-terminal domain. This domain shares a high degree of sequence homology with GlyRβ making it not unlikely that GlyRβ-specific autoantibody (aAb) exist and contribute to the disease pathology.
METHODS
METHODS
In this study, we investigated serum samples from 58 patients for aAb specifically detecting GlyRβ. Studies in microarray format, cell-based assays, and primary spinal cord neurons and spinal cord tissue immunohistochemistry were performed to determine specific GlyRβ binding and define aAb binding to distinct protein regions. Preadsorption approaches of aAbs using living cells and the purified extracellular receptor domain were further used. Finally, functional consequences for inhibitory neurotransmission upon GlyRβ aAb binding were resolved by whole-cell patch-clamp recordings.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 58 samples investigated, cell-based assays, tissue analysis, and preadsorption approaches revealed 2 patients with high specificity for GlyRβ aAb. Quantitative protein cluster analysis demonstrated aAb binding to synaptic GlyRβ colocalized with the scaffold protein gephyrin independent of the presence of GlyRα1. At the functional level, binding of GlyRβ aAb from both patients to its target impair glycine efficacy.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study establishes GlyRβ as novel target of aAb in patients with SPS/PERM. In contrast to exclusively GlyRα1-positive sera, which alter glycine potency, aAbs against GlyRβ impair receptor efficacy for the neurotransmitter glycine. Imaging and functional analyses showed that GlyRβ aAbs antagonize inhibitory neurotransmission by affecting receptor function rather than localization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38215349
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200187
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e200187Références
Neuron. 2021 Sep 1;109(17):2707-2716.e6
pubmed: 34473954
Epilepsia. 2014 Mar;55(3):414-22
pubmed: 24502404
Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2578:17-25
pubmed: 36152277
EMBO J. 1991 Sep;10(9):2401-9
pubmed: 1651228
Front Mol Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;14:745275
pubmed: 34630038
J Physiol. 2000 May 15;525 Pt 1:1-9
pubmed: 10811719
Brain. 2019 Nov 1;142(11):3398-3410
pubmed: 31591639
Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Nov;3(11):2025-30
pubmed: 7874121
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 5;7(9):e1227
pubmed: 28872638
EMBO J. 1993 Oct;12(10):3729-37
pubmed: 8404844
Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand. 1958;33(4):471-6
pubmed: 13594585
Brain. 2014 Aug;137(Pt 8):2178-92
pubmed: 24951641
Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133-149
pubmed: 1408309
Pain. 2007 Aug;130(3):249-253
pubmed: 17257751
Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Mar 1;22(5):927-40
pubmed: 23184146
Neuropharmacology. 2009 Jan;56(1):303-9
pubmed: 18721822
Neurobiol Dis. 2013 Apr;52:137-49
pubmed: 23238346
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Mar;92:103-107
pubmed: 30641251
Ann Neurol. 2017 Aug;82(2):271-277
pubmed: 28749549
Ann Neurol. 2020 Sep;88(3):544-561
pubmed: 32588476
Brain. 1980 Dec;103(4):985-97
pubmed: 6777025
Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 Oct;10(19):e2100830
pubmed: 34350717
Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Aug;29(4):496-506
pubmed: 27262149
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015 Dec 10;3(1):e186
pubmed: 26767190
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Feb;170:106542
pubmed: 33387801
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
Front Mol Neurosci. 2023 Feb 13;16:1089101
pubmed: 36860666
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;74(4):462-5
pubmed: 12640064
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):224-9
pubmed: 26344198
Nature. 2001 May 31;411(6837):587-90
pubmed: 11385573
Nature. 2021 Nov;599(7885):513-517
pubmed: 34555840
EMBO J. 1992 Dec;11(12):4305-11
pubmed: 1385113
Neurology. 2000 Nov 28;55(10):1531-5
pubmed: 11094109
Neurology. 2008 Oct 14;71(16):1291-2
pubmed: 18852446
Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2):136-41
pubmed: 7920630
Elife. 2021 Dec 08;10:
pubmed: 34878402
Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2578:143-159
pubmed: 36152285
J Comp Neurol. 2007 Jun 20;502(6):1012-29
pubmed: 17444490
Psychol Rep. 2003 Dec;93(3 Pt 2):1059-69
pubmed: 14765570
Neuron. 2005 Mar 3;45(5):727-39
pubmed: 15748848
Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;22:141-73
pubmed: 2885745
Mol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;22(10):1431-1439
pubmed: 28167838
Physiol Rev. 2004 Oct;84(4):1051-95
pubmed: 15383648