Qualitative interview study of strategies to support healthcare personnel mental health through an occupational health lens.

MENTAL HEALTH OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 13 1 2024
pubmed: 13 1 2024
entrez: 12 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Employee Occupational Health ('occupational health') clinicians have expansive perspectives of the experience of healthcare personnel. Integrating mental health into the purview of occupational health is a newer approach that could combat historical limitations of healthcare personnel mental health programmes, which have been isolated and underused. We aimed to document innovation and opportunities for supporting healthcare personnel mental health through occupational health clinicians. This work was part of a national qualitative needs assessment of employee occupational health clinicians during COVID-19 who were very much at the centre of organisational responses. This qualitative needs assessment included key informant interviews obtained using snowball sampling methods. We interviewed 43 US Veterans Health Administration occupational health clinicians from 29 facilities. This analysis focused on personnel mental health needs and opportunities, using consensus coding of interview transcripts and modified member checking. Three major opportunities to support mental health through occupational health involved: (1) expanded mental health needs of healthcare personnel, including opportunities to support work-related concerns (eg, traumatic deployments), home-based concerns and bereavement (eg, working with chaplains); (2) leveraging expanded roles and protocols to address healthcare personnel mental health concerns, including opportunities in expanding occupational health roles, cross-disciplinary partnerships (eg, with employee assistance programmes (EAP)) and process/protocol (eg, acute suicidal ideation pathways) and (3) need for supporting occupational health clinicians' own mental health, including opportunities to address overwork/burn-out with adequate staffing/resources. Occupational health can enact strategies to support personnel mental health: to structurally sustain attention, use social cognition tools (eg, suicidality protocols or expanded job descriptions); to leverage distributed attention, enhance interdisciplinary collaboration (eg, chaplains for bereavement support or EAP) and to equip systems with resources and allow for flexibility during crises, including increased staffing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Employee Occupational Health ('occupational health') clinicians have expansive perspectives of the experience of healthcare personnel. Integrating mental health into the purview of occupational health is a newer approach that could combat historical limitations of healthcare personnel mental health programmes, which have been isolated and underused.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We aimed to document innovation and opportunities for supporting healthcare personnel mental health through occupational health clinicians. This work was part of a national qualitative needs assessment of employee occupational health clinicians during COVID-19 who were very much at the centre of organisational responses.
DESIGN METHODS
This qualitative needs assessment included key informant interviews obtained using snowball sampling methods.
PARTICIPANTS METHODS
We interviewed 43 US Veterans Health Administration occupational health clinicians from 29 facilities.
APPROACH METHODS
This analysis focused on personnel mental health needs and opportunities, using consensus coding of interview transcripts and modified member checking.
KEY RESULTS RESULTS
Three major opportunities to support mental health through occupational health involved: (1) expanded mental health needs of healthcare personnel, including opportunities to support work-related concerns (eg, traumatic deployments), home-based concerns and bereavement (eg, working with chaplains); (2) leveraging expanded roles and protocols to address healthcare personnel mental health concerns, including opportunities in expanding occupational health roles, cross-disciplinary partnerships (eg, with employee assistance programmes (EAP)) and process/protocol (eg, acute suicidal ideation pathways) and (3) need for supporting occupational health clinicians' own mental health, including opportunities to address overwork/burn-out with adequate staffing/resources.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Occupational health can enact strategies to support personnel mental health: to structurally sustain attention, use social cognition tools (eg, suicidality protocols or expanded job descriptions); to leverage distributed attention, enhance interdisciplinary collaboration (eg, chaplains for bereavement support or EAP) and to equip systems with resources and allow for flexibility during crises, including increased staffing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38216178
pii: bmjopen-2023-075920
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075920
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e075920

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Cati Brown-Johnson (C)

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA catibj@stanford.edu karleen@stanford.edu.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Cheyenne DeShields (C)

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Matthew McCaa (M)

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA.

Natalie Connell (N)

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Susan N Giannitrapani (SN)

Employee Occupational Health, Wilmington VA Medical Center, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.

Wendy Thanassi (W)

Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Occupational Health Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.

Elizabeth M Yano (EM)

Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Medicine, Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Sara J Singer (SJ)

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Karl A Lorenz (KA)

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Karleen Giannitrapani (K)

Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, California, USA catibj@stanford.edu karleen@stanford.edu.
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH